European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 272, Issue 1, pp 207–217

How often do head and neck cancer patients raise concerns related to intimacy and sexuality in routine follow-up clinics?

  • S. N. Rogers
  • P. Hazeldine
  • K. O’Brien
  • D. Lowe
  • B. Roe
Head and Neck


Intimacy and sexuality problems are underreported in head and neck cancer patients. The aim of this study was to collate the various prompts available in a routine follow-up clinic through the use of an intimacy screening question and Patient’s Concerns Inventory (PCI), and to identify how often these problems were raised by patients and what possible actions took place as a consequence. 177 patients completed the intimacy screening question, PCI and UW-QOLv.4 at follow-up clinics, from October 2008 to January 2011. Case note review identified if intimacy was mentioned in clinic letters and if referral for support was made. On the intimacy screening question, 15 % (26) reported problems of considerable/some concern (24) or selected intimacy/sexuality on the PCI (2). The PCI identified that 9 of the 24 reporting the worst problems wanted the topic discussed in clinic, and clinic letters suggested that 5 of these discussed the issue in clinic with 4 being referred on, 3 to a clinical psychologist and 1 to a clinical nurse specialist. Intimacy problems are underreported in clinic reviews. It is a difficult subject to discuss. It will remain a potential unmet need unless attempts are made to advance the opportunities for patient screening, information leaflets, staff training on how to talk about such sensitive issues and referral for counselling.


Head and neck cancer Intimacy Sexuality Patient-reported outcomes Patient Concerns Inventory UW-QOL 


  1. 1.
    Payakachat N, Ounpraseuth S, Suen JY (2013) Late complications and long-term quality of life for survivors (> 5 years) with history of head and neck cancer. Head Neck 35:819–825PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sayed SI, Elmiyeh B, Rhys-Evans P, Syrigos KN, Nutting CM, Harrington KJ, Kazi R (2009) Quality of life and outcomes research in head and neck cancer: a review of the state of the discipline and likely future directions. Cancer Treat Rev 35:397–402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Low C, Fullarton M, Parkinson E, O’Brien K, Jackson SR, Lowe D, Rogers SN (2009) Issues of intimacy and sexual dysfunction following major head and neck cancer treatment. Oral Oncol 45:898–903PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    O’Brien K, Roe B, Low C, Deyn L, Rogers SN (2012) An exploration of the perceived changes in intimacy of patients’ relationships following head and neck cancer. J Clin Nurs 21:2499–2508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Manne S, Badr H, Kashy DA (2012) A longitudinal analysis of intimacy processes and psychological distress among couples coping with head and neck or lung cancers. J Behav Med 35:334–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Manne S, Badr H (2010) Intimacy processes and psychological distress among couples coping with head and neck or lung cancers. Psychooncology 19:941–954PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Manne S (2011) Restoring intimacy in relationships affected by cancer. Curr Clin Urol 5:739–750Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reese JB (2011) Coping with sexual concerns after cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 23:313–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kotronoulas G, Papadopoulou C, Patiraki E (2009) Nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding provision of sexual health care in patients with cancer: critical review of the evidence. Support Care Cancer 17:479–501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ratner ES, Foran KA, Schwartz PE, Minkin MJ (2010) Sexuality and intimacy after gynecological cancer. Maturitas 66:23–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Beck AM, Robinson JW, Carlson LE (2009) Sexual intimacy in heterosexual couples after prostate cancer treatment: what we know and what we still need to learn. Urol Oncol 27:137–143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krychman ML, Katz A (2012) Breast cancer and sexuality: multi-modal treatment options. J Sex Med 9:5–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee YK, Chung HH, Kim JW, Park NH, Song YS, Kang SB (2011) Vaginal pH-balanced gel for the control of atrophic vaginitis among breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 117:922–927PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bjordal K, Hammerlid E, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, de Graeff A, Boysen M, Evensen JF (1999) Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: validation of the EORTC H&N35. J Clin Oncol 17:1008–1019PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Funk GF, Karnell LH, Christensen AJ, Moran PJ, Ricks J (2003) Comprehensive head and neck oncology health status assessment. Head Neck 25:561–575PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    List MA, D’Antonio LL, Cella DF, Siston A, Mumby P, Haraf D et al (1996) The performance status scale for head and neck cancer patients and the functional assessment of cancer therapy-head and neck scale. A study of utility and validity. Cancer 77:2294–2301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rogers SN, El-Sheikha J, Lowe D (2009) The development of a Patients Concerns Inventory (PCI) to help reveal patients concerns in the head and neck clinic. Oral Oncol 45:555–561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rogers SN, Gwane S, Lowe D, Humphris G, Yueh B, Weymuller EA (2002) The addition of mood and anxiety domains to the University of Washington Quality of Life Scale. Head Neck 24:521–529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rogers SN, Lowe D, Yueh B, Weymuller EA (2010) The physical function and social-emotional function subscales of the University of Washington Quality of Life questionnaire (UW-QOL). Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136:352–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reese JB, Shelby RA, Abernethy AP (2011) Sexual concerns in lung cancer patients: an examination of predictors and moderating effects of age and gender. Support Care Cancer 19:161–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lindau ST, Schumm LP, Laumann EO, Levinson W, O’Muircheartaigh CA, Waite LJ (2007) A study of sexuality and health among older adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 357:762–774PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Laumann EO, Nicolosi A, Glasser DB, Paik A, Gingell C, Moreira E et al (2005) Sexual problems among women and men aged 40–80 y: prevalence and correlates identified in the global study of sexual attitudes and behaviours. Int J Impot Res 17:39–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Romito F, Corvasce C, Montanaro R, Mattioli V (2011) Do elderly cancer patients have different care needs compared with younger ones? Tumori 97:374–379PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yurek D, Farrar W, Andersen BL (2000) Breast cancer surgery: comparing surgical groups and determining individual differences in postoperative sexuality and body change stress. J Consult Clin Psychol 68:697–709PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Flynn KE, Jeffery DD, Keefe FJ, Porter LS, Shelby RA, Fawzy MR, Gosselin TK, Reeve BB, Weinfurt KP (2011) Sexual functioning along the cancer continuum: focus group results from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®). Psychooncology 20:378–386PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brotto LA, Yule M, Breckon E (2010) Psychological interventions for the sexual sequelae of cancer: a review of the literature. J Cancer Surviv 4:346–360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. N. Rogers
    • 1
    • 2
  • P. Hazeldine
    • 3
  • K. O’Brien
    • 2
  • D. Lowe
    • 1
    • 2
  • B. Roe
    • 2
  1. 1.Regional Maxillofacial UnitUniversity Hospital AintreeLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.Faculty of Health and Social Care, Evidence-Based Practice Research Centre (EPRC)Edge Hill UniversityOrmskirkUK
  3. 3.Liverpool Medical SchoolUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations