Suction ability plays an important role in supporting oral nutrition and needs special care following neurological disorders and tumor-associated defects. However, the details of suction are still poorly understood. The present study evaluates displacement of orofacial structures during suction and deglutition based on manometric controlled MRI. Nine healthy subjects were scanned wearing an intraoral mouthpiece for water intake by suction and subsequent swallowing. Suction-swallowing cycles were identified by intraoral negative pressure. Midsagittal MRI slices (3 T; temporal resolution 0.53 s) were analyzed at rest, suction and pharyngeal swallowing. The mandibular displacement was measured as the distance between the anterior nasal spine and the inferior point of the mandible. Following areas were defined: subpalatal compartment (SCA), retrolingual (RLA), epipharyngeal (EPA) and mouth floor area (MFA). During rest, an average distance of 7 cm was observed between the mandibular measurement points. The measured SCA was 3.67 cm2, the RLA 6.98 cm2, the EPA 9.00 cm2 and the MFA 15.21 cm2 (average values). At the end of suction, the mandibular distance reduces (to 6.88 cm), the SCA increases significantly (to 5.96 cm2; p = 0.0002), the RLA decreases (to 6.45 cm2), the EPA increases (to 10.59 cm2) and the MFA decreases (to 15.02 cm2). During deglutition, the mandible lifted significantly (to 6.81 cm; p = 0.0276), the SCA reduced to zero, the RLA was not measurable, the EPA reduces significantly (to 3.01 cm2; p < 0.0001) and the MFA increases (to 16.36 cm2). According to these observations, a combined displacement of the tongue in an anteroposterior direction with active tongue dorsum—velum contact appears to be the predominant activity during suction and responsible for the expansion of the subpalatal area.
Suction Swallowing Dynamic MRI Dysphagia
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Perie S, Laccourreye L, Flahault A, Hazebroucq V, Chaussade S, St Guily JL (1998) Role of videoendoscopy in assessment of pharyngeal function in oropharyngeal dysphagia: comparison with videofluoroscopy and manometry. Laryngoscope 108(11 Pt 1):1712–1716PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logemann JA, Rademaker AW, Pauloski BR, Ohmae Y, Kahrilas PJ (1998) Normal swallowing physiology as viewed by videofluoroscopy and videoendoscopy. Folia Phoniatr Logop 50(6):311–319 (pii 21473)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu CH, Hsiao TY, Chen JC, Chang YC, Lee SY (1997) Evaluation of swallowing safety with fiberoptic endoscope: comparison with videofluoroscopic technique. Laryngoscope 107(3):396–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler SG, Stuart A, Kemp S (2009) Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in healthy young and older adults. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 118(2):99–106PubMedGoogle Scholar
Moriniere S, Hammoudi K, Marmouset F, Bakhos D, Beutter P, Patat F (2013) Ultrasound analysis of the upper esophageal sphincter during swallowing in the healthy subject. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 130(6):321–325. doi:10.1016/j.anorl.2012.01.008PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaiman M, Eviatar E, Segal S (2004) Surface electromyographic studies of swallowing in normal subjects: a review of 440 adults. Report 2. Quantitative data: amplitude measures. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131(5):773–780. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2004.03.014PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelke W, Schönle PW (1991) Electromagnetic articulography: a new method for studying the motor function of the velum palatinum. Folia Phoniatr (Basel) 43(3):147–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anagnostara A, Stoeckli S, Weber OM, Kollias SS (2001) Evaluation of the anatomical and functional properties of deglutition with various kinetic high-speed MRI sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 14(2):194–199. doi:10.1002/jmri.1172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panebianco V, Ruoppolo G, Pelle G, Schettino I, Roma R, Bernardo S, De Vincentiis C, Longo L, Passariello R (2010) Morpho-functional patterns of physiologic oropharyngeal swallowing evaluated with dynamic fast MRI. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267(9):1461–1466. doi:10.1007/s00405-010-1232-0PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amin MR, Achlatis S, Lazarus CL, Branski RC, Storey P, Praminik B, Fang Y, Sodickson DK (2013) Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the pharynx during deglutition. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 122(3):145–150PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
Bae Y, Kuehn DP, Conway CA, Sutton BP (2011) Real-time magnetic resonance imaging of velopharyngeal activities with simultaneous speech recordings. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 48(6):695–707. doi:10.1597/09-158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar