Advertisement

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 271, Issue 9, pp 2433–2436 | Cite as

Septoplasty: under general or sedation anesthesia. Which is more efficacious?

  • Hayrettin Daşkaya
  • Haşmet Yazıcı
  • Sedat Doğan
  • İlknur Haberal Can
Rhinology

Abstract

The objective of the study was to assess the more efficacious anesthesia method in septal surgery. The prospective study was conducted at an academic secondary referral center. A prospective chart review of 60 patients, between the ages of 16 and 65, who underwent septal surgery under general (GA) or sedation (SDA) anesthesia during 1-year period was done. Mean age of the patients was 44.30 ± 13.29. Patients were divided into two groups according to the anesthesia method: general (group 1) or sedation (group 2). Intraoperative hemodynamic variables, surgery time, intraoperative blood loss volume, length of hospital stay, postoperative vomiting and nausea, postoperative pain score according to the visual analog scale (VAS) and cost analysis of each method were compared. Thirty-six males and 24 females with a mean age 44.30 ± 13.29 were included to the study. Total operation time, operation time, intraoperative and postoperative bleeding volume, postoperative nausea and vomiting, duration of hospital stay after surgery, were better in group 2. Postoperative pain scores and patient satisfaction about surgery were not statistically different. Cost of anesthesia in group 1 per patient was $44.35 ± 10.81 and in group 2, $16.29 ± 11.88 (p < 0.01). Hospital stay after surgery was much longer in group 1 than group 2 (p < 0.01). Using SDA is better in many ways including cost-effectiveness than using GA for septoplasty operation.

Keywords

Septoplasty Cost analysis Sedation anesthesia General anesthesia 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None for all authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Fornadley JA, Kennedy KS, Wilson JF, Galantich PT, Parker GS (1992) Anesthetic choice for functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol 6:1–4. doi: 10.2500/105065892781976745 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fedok FG, Ferraro RE, Kingsley CP, Fornadley JA (2000) Operative times, postanesthesia recovery times, and complications during sinonasal surgery using general anesthesia and local anesthesia with sedation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122:560–566. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2000.100495 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gittelman PD, Jacobs JB, Skorina J (1993) Comparison of functional endoscopic sinus surgery under local and general anesthesia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 102:289–293PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Danielsen A, Gravningsbråten R, Olofsson J (2003) Anaesthesia in endoscopic sinus surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 260(9):481–486. doi: 10.1007/s00405-003-0613-z PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D’Ascanio L, Cappiello L, Piazza F (2013) Unilateral hemiplegia: a unique complication of septoplasty. J Laryngol Otol 127(8):809–810. doi: 10.1017/S0022215113001436 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tawadros AM, Prahlow JA (2008) Death related to nasal surgery: case report with review of therapy-related deaths. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 29:260–264. doi: 10.1097/PAF.0b013e3181832432 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Monteiro ML (2006) Unilateral blindness as a complication of nasal septoplasty: case report. Arq Bras Oftalmol 69:249–250. doi: 10.1590/S0004-27492006000200020 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dogan R, Erbek S, Gonencer HH, Erbek HS, Isbilen C, Arslan G (2010) Comparison of local anaesthesia with dexmedetomidine sedation and general anaesthesia during septoplasty. Eur J Anaesthesiol 27:960–964. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833a45c4 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khwaja S, Pahade AV, Luff D, Green MW, Green KM (2007) Nasal fracture reduction: local versus general anaesthesia. Rhinology 45:83–88PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Srinivasan V, Arasaratnam RB, Jankelowitz GA (1995) Day-case septal surgery under general anaesthesia and local anaesthesia with sedation. J Laryngol Otol 109(7):614–617PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Waldron J, Mitchell DB, Ford G (1989) Reduction of fractured nasal bones; local versus general anaesthesia. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 14:357–359. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1989.tb00384.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shiley SG, Lalwani K, Milczuk HA (2003) Intravenous sedation vs general anesthesia for pediatric otolaryngology procedures. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129:637–641. doi: 10.1001/archotol.129.6.637 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hayrettin Daşkaya
    • 1
  • Haşmet Yazıcı
    • 2
  • Sedat Doğan
    • 3
  • İlknur Haberal Can
    • 4
  1. 1.Anesthesia and Reanimation Clinic, Faculty of MedicineBezmialem Vakıf UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Ear Nose Throat Clinic, Faculty of MedicineBalıkesir UniversityBalıkesirTurkey
  3. 3.Ear Nose Throat Clinic, Faculty of MedicineAdıyaman UniversityAdıyamanTurkey
  4. 4.Ear Nose Throat Clinic, Faculty of MedicineBagcılar Medipol UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations