Advertisement

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 271, Issue 7, pp 1897–1902 | Cite as

Endoscopic vs microscopic myringoplasty: a different perspective

  • Himani Lade
  • Santosha Ram Choudhary
  • Ashish VashishthEmail author
Otology

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to ascertain the feasibility of transcanal endoscopic underlay myringoplasty using temporalis fascia and compare the results with microscopic myringoplasty. This prospective randomized trial included 60 patients with mucosal chronic otitis media with tympanic membrane perforations of all sizes and locations apart from posteriorly based small or moderate sized perforations. In the endoscopy group, 30 patients underwent exclusive transcanal myringoplasty using tympanomeatal flap elevation with underlay graft placement. In the microscopy group, 30 patients underwent myringoplasty using the postaural approach. Intra-operative variables compared were canalplasty and canal wall curettage for assessment of ossicular status. Graft uptake, hearing outcomes using pure tone audiometry and subjective cosmetic outcomes were assessed 24 weeks post-operatively and compared in the two groups. Resident feedback on the feasibility of endoscopic myringoplasty was obtained using a questionnaire. In the microscopy group, 5/30 patients required canalplasty due to canal overhangs and 4/30 required canal wall curettage for ossicular assessment, whereas none of the patients in the endoscopy group required these procedures. A graft uptake rate of 83.3 % was observed in both groups post-operatively after 24 weeks. Mean air-bone gap pre- and post-operatively in the endoscopy group was 28.5 and 18.13 dB, respectively, whereas these values were 32.4 and 16.9 dB, respectively, in the microscopy group. Subjective cosmetic outcomes were better in the endoscopy group. Resident feedback on endoscopic myringoplasty was positive. Endoscopic myringoplasty appears to be an effective alternative to microscopic myringoplasty and results in excellent hearing with good cosmetic outcomes.

Keywords

Endoscopy Myringoplasty Tympanic membrane Tympanoplasty 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Chen B, Fry TL, Fischer ND (1979) Otoscopy and photography: a new method. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 88:771–773PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Migirov L, Shapira Y, Hoeowitz Z, Wolf M (2011) Exclusive endoscopic ear surgery for acquired cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 32:433–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marchioni D, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Molteni G, Genovese E, Presutti L (2010) Endoscopic tympanoplasty in patients with attic retraction pockets. Laryngoscope 120:1847–1855PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yung MW (1994) The use of rigid endoscopes in cholesteatoma surgery. J Laryngol Otol 108:307–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marchioni D, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Molteni G, Villari D, Monzani D, Presutti L (2011) Ossicular preservation after exclusive endoscopic transcanal tympanoplasty: preliminary experience. Otol Neurotol 32(4):626–631PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marchioni D, Villari D, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Piccinini A, Presutti L (2011) Endoscopic open technique in patients with middle ear cholesteatoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268(11):1557–1563PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marchioni D, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Piccinini A, Genovese E, Monzani D, Tarabichi M et al (2011) Surgical anatomy of the transcanal endoscopic approach to the tympanic facial nerve. Laryngoscope 121(7):1563–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abdel Baki F, El Dine MB, El Saiid I, Bakry M (2002) Sinus tympani endoscopic anatomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127(3):158–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    El-Guindy A (1992) Endoscopic transcanal myringoplasty. J Laryngol Otol 106:493–495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yadav SP, Aggarwal N, Julaha M, Goel A (2009) Endoscope-assisted myringoplasty. Singap Med J 50:510–512Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Raj A, Meher R (2001) Endoscopic transcanal myringoplasty: a study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 53:47–49PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Karhuketo TS, Ilomaki JH, Puhakka HJ (2001) Tympanoscope-assisted myringoplasty. Otorhinolaryngology 63:353–358Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harugop AS, Mudhol RS, Godhi RA (2008) A comparative study of endoscope assisted myringoplasty and microscope assisted myringoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 60:298–302PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ayache S (2013) Cartilaginous myringoplasty, the endoscopic transcanal procedure. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:853–860PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Coskun BU, Cinar U, Seven H, Ugur S, Dadas B (2006) The effects of the incision types in myringoplasty operations on cosmetics. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 263:820–822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fisch U (2008) Tympanoplasty, mastoidectomy and stapes surgery, 2nd edn. Thieme, New York, pp 8–11Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vijayendra H, Ittop CJ, Sangeetha R (2008) Comparative study of hearing improvement in type 1 tympanoplasty with and without canalplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 60(4):341–344PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Adad B, Rasgon BM, Ackerson L (2001) Relationship of the facial nerve to the tympanic annulus: a direct anatomic examination. Laryngoscope 109(8):1189–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vartiainen E, Nuutinen J (1993) Success and pitfalls in myringoplasty: follow-up study of 404 cases. Am J Otol 14(3):301–305PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Westerberg J, Harder H, Magnuson B, Westerberg L, Hyden D (2011) Ten year myringoplasty series: does the cause of perforation affect the success rate? J Laryngol Otol 125:126–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Onal K, Arslanoglu S, Songu M, Demiray U, Demirpehlivan IA (2012) Functional results of temporalis fascia versus cartilage tympanoplasty in patients with bilateral chronic otitis media. J Laryngol Otol 126:22–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Himani Lade
    • 1
  • Santosha Ram Choudhary
    • 1
  • Ashish Vashishth
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of ENT and Head and Neck SurgeryVardhaman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung HospitalNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations