High-speed thermal imaging enables visualization of heating of the vestibule during laser-assisted stapedotomy, comparing KTP, CO2, and Thulium laser light. Perforation of the stapes footplate with laser bears the risk of heating of the inner ear fluids. The amount of heating depends on absorption of the laser light and subsequent tissue ablation. The ablation of the footplate is driven by strong water absorption for the CO2 and Thulium laser. For the KTP laser wavelength, ablation is driven by carbonization of the footplate and it might penetrate deep into the inner ear without absorption in water. The thermal effects were visualized in an inner ear model, using two new techniques: (1) high-speed Schlieren imaging shows relative dynamic changes of temperatures up to 2 ms resolution in the perilymph. (2) Thermo imaging provides absolute temperature measurements around the footplate up to 40 ms resolution. The high-speed Schlieren imaging showed minimal heating using the KTP laser. Both CO2 and Thulium laser showed heating below the footplate. Thulium laser wavelength generated heating up to 0.6 mm depth. This was confirmed with thermal imaging, showing a rise of temperature of 4.7 (±3.5) °C for KTP and 9.4 (±6.9) for Thulium in the area of 2 mm below the footplate. For stapedotomy, the Thulium and CO2 laser show more extended thermal effects compared to KTP. High-speed Schlieren imaging and thermal imaging are complimentary techniques to study lasers thermal effects in tissue.
Otosclerosis Laser Stapedotomy KTP CO2Thulium
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Some of the laser equipment used for this study was provided by Omniguide, Cambridge, MA, USA and Biolase, Irvine, Ca, USA.
Hausler R, Schar PJ, Pratisto H, Weber HP, Frenz M (1999) Advantages and dangers of erbium laser application in stapedotomy. Acta Otolaryngol 119:207–213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner G, Robertson JH, Tomoda K, Clark WC (1984) CO2 laser stapedotomy: is it practical? Am J Otolaryngol 5:108–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong BJ, Neev J, van Gemert MJ (1997) Surface temperature distributions in carbon dioxide, argon, and KTP (Nd:YAG) laser ablated otic capsule and calvarial bone. Am J Otol 18:766–772PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdaasdonk RM, van Swol CF, Grimbergen MC, Rem AI (2006) Imaging techniques for research and education of thermal and mechanical interactions of lasers with biological and model tissues. J Biomed Opt 11:041110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noyes WS, McCaffrey TV, Fabry DA, Robinette MS, Suman VJ (1996) Effect of temperature elevation on rabbit cochlear function as measured by distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 115:548–552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett SB (1980) The influence of ultrasound and temperature on the cochlear microphonic response following a round window irradiation. Acta Otolaryngol 90:32–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesinski SG, Palmer A (1989) Lasers for otosclerosis: CO2 vs. Argon and KTP-532. Laryngoscope 99:1–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
Gherini S, Horn KL, Causse JB, McArthur GR (1993) Fiberoptic argon laser stapedotomy: is it safe? Am J Otol 14:283–289PubMedGoogle Scholar
Kodali S, Harvey SA, Prieto TE (1997) Thermal effects of laser stapedectomy in an animal model: CO2 versus KTP. Laryngoscope 107:1445–1450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar