European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 271, Issue 4, pp 727–732 | Cite as

Morphometric analysis of the maxillary sinus in patients with nasal septum deviation

  • Israfil Orhan
  • Tugrul Ormeci
  • Salih Aydin
  • Gokhan Altin
  • Efsun Urger
  • Erkan Soylu
  • Fahrettin Yilmaz


The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between nasal septum deviation, which is common in the general population, and maxillary sinus volume. A retrospective assessment was made for 96 patients with nasal septum deviation without coexisting sinonasal morbidity and compared to 60 healthy individuals. A three-dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography images was used to assess a total of 312 maxillary sinus volumes. Septal deviation angles and volumes were also measured to standardize and determine the severity of the septal deviations. Septal deviations were right-sided in 36.5 % of the cases (n = 35) and left-sided in 63.5 % (n = 61). Deviation angles varied between 5° and 24.4°, with a mean value of 12.9 ± 5.0. The mean value for the deviation volume was 4.6 ± 1.5 cm3 (range 1.7–9.4). The right and left maxillary sinus volumes were 11.8 ± 4.7 cm3 and 11.5 ± 4.4 cm3, respectively, in control group. Statistically significant discrepancy was observed between the ipsilateral and contralateral maxillary sinus volumes, in regard to the side of the septal deviation in study group. Maxillary sinus volumes were found to be significantly smaller on the ipsilateral side of septal deviation compared with the contralateral side.


Septal deviation Maxillary sinus volume Three-dimensional imaging Computerized tomography 


  1. 1.
    Klein JC (1986) Nasal respiratory function and craniofacial growth. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 112:843–849PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D’Ascanio L, Lancione C, Pompa G, Rebuffini E, Mansi N, Manzini M (2010) Craniofacial growth in children with nasal septum deviation: a cephalometric comparative study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 74:1180–1183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim J, Song SW, Cho JH, Chang KH, Jun BC (2010) Comparative study of the pneumatization of the mastoid aircells and paranasal sinuses using three-dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography scans. Surg Radiol Anat 32:593–599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cooper BC (1989) Nasorespiratory function and orofacial development. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 22:413–441PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Apuhan T, Yıldırım YS, Özaslan H (2011) The developmental relation between adenoid tissue and paranasal sinus volumes in three-dimensional computed tomography assessment. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 144:964–971PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jun BC, Song SW, Park CS, Lee DH, Cho KJ, Cho JH (2005) The analysis of maxillary sinus aeration according to aging process; volume assessment by three-dimensional reconstruction by high-resolutional CT scanning. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132:429–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sánchez Fernández JM, Anta Escuredo JA, Sánchez Del Rey A, Santaolalla Montoya F (2000) Morphometric study of the paranasal sinuses in normal and pathological conditions. Acta Otolaryngol 120:273–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Adibelli ZH, Songu M, Adibelli H (2011) Paranasal sinus development in children: a magnetic resonance imaging analysis. Am J Rhinol Allergy 25:30–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shah RK, Dhingra JK, Carter BL, Rebeiz EE (2003) Paranasal sinus development: a radiographic study. Laryngoscope 113:205–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kawarai Y, Fukushima K, Ogawa T et al (1999) Volume quantification of healthy paranasal cavity by three-dimensional CT imaging. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 540:45–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Graney DO (1998) Rice DH Anatomy. In: Cummings CW, Fredrickson JM, Harker LA et al (eds) Otolaryngology head and neck surgery, 3rd edn. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 1059–1064Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Park IH, Song JS, Choi H et al (2010) Volumetric study in the development of paranasal sinuses by CT imaging in Asian: a pilot study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 74:1347–1350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barghouth G, Prior JO, Lepori D, Duvoisin B, Schnyder P, Gudinchet F (2002) Paranasal sinuses in children: size evaluation of maxillary, sphenoid, and frontal sinuses by magnetic resonance imaging and proposal of volume index percentile curves. Eur Radiol 12:1451–1458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Odita JC, Akamaguna AI, Ogisi FO, Amu OD, Ugbodaga CI (1986) Pneumatisation of the maxillary sinus in normal and symptomatic children. Pediatr Radiol 16:365–367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chrcanovic BR, Freire-Maia B (2010) Maxillary sinus aplasia. Oral Maxillofac Surg 14:187–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Price DL, Friedman O (2007) Facial asymmetry in maxillary sinus hypoplasia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 71:1627–1630PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bassiouny A, Newlands WJ, Ali H, Zaki Y (1982) Maxillary sinus hypoplasia and superior orbital fissure asymmetry. Laryngoscope 92:441–448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Israfil Orhan
    • 1
  • Tugrul Ormeci
    • 2
  • Salih Aydin
    • 1
  • Gokhan Altin
    • 1
  • Efsun Urger
    • 2
  • Erkan Soylu
    • 1
  • Fahrettin Yilmaz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ENTIstanbul Medipol UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyIstanbul Medipol UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations