Advertisement

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 270, Issue 12, pp 3005–3017 | Cite as

PORP vs. TORP: a meta-analysis

  • Huiqian Yu
  • Yingzi He
  • Yusu Ni
  • Yunfeng Wang
  • Na Lu
  • Huawei LiEmail author
Review Article

Abstract

After the surgical procedure of ossicular chain reconstruction, the effectiveness and/or stability of partial ossicular replacement prosthesis (PORP) or total ossicular replacement prosthesis (TORP) were systematically compared and evaluated using meta-analysis. A total of 40 eligible investigations with 4,311 subjects were included in our study. There was a significant difference in the effectiveness of the reconstruction of the ossicular chain between PORP and TORP; the data showed a combined risk ratio (RR) of 1.28 (95 % CI 1.17–1.41, p < 0.00001), but no notable difference was obtained in staged procedures subgroup and cholesteatoma subgroup, with a combined RR of 1.13 (95 % CI 0.60–2.11, p = 0.70) in staged procedures subgroup and RR of 2.60 (95 % CI 0.20–36.21, p = 0.59 in cholesteatoma subgroup). There was a statistically significant difference in the stability of the prostheses in long-term follow-up, with a combined RR of 0.37 (95 % CI 0.16–0.85, p = 0.02), but no significant difference was observed in the total sample, with a combined RR of 0.64 (95 % CI 0.40–1.03, p = 0.06). Our overall results suggest that the effectiveness of PORP was higher than TORP, except within staged procedures subgroup and cholesteatoma subgroup. In addition, the stability of PORP was significantly superior to TORP in long-term follow-ups, but no significant effect was detected in the general study.

Keywords

Conductive hearing loss Ossicular reconstruction PORP TORP Meta-analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Lichun Zhang and Chunyu Zhang for kind advice on statistical analysis. This work was supported by grants from the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program) (2011CB504506, 2010CB945503).

Conflict of interest

Equal contribution as first author (Huiqian Yu and Yingzi He). We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Pfiffner F, Caversaccio MD, Kompis M (2011) Comparisons of sound processors based on osseointegrated implants in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 32:728–735CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yung M, Vowler SL (2006) Long-term results in ossiculoplasty: an analysis of prognostic factors. Otol Neurotol 27:874–881CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Offergeld C, Kromeier J, Merchant SN, Lasurashvili N, Neudert M, Bornitz M, Laszig R, Zahnert T (2010) Experimental investigation of rotational tomography in reconstructed middle ears with clinical implications. Hear Res 263:191–197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zollner F (1955) The principles of plastic surgery of the sound-conducting apparatus. J Laryngol Otol 69:637–652CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang LC, Zhang TY, Dai PD, Luo JF (2011) Titanium versus non-titanium prostheses in ossiculoplasty: a meta-analysis. Acta Otolaryngol 131:708–715CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bayazit Y, Goksu N, Beder L (1999) Functional results of Plastipore prostheses for middle ear ossicular chain reconstruction. Laryngoscope 109:709–711CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Romaguera Lliso MD, Sanz Gonzalo JJ (2003) Cartilage palisades in type III tympanoplasty: anatomic and functional long-term results. Otol Neurotol 24:38–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vassbotn FS, Moller P, Silvola J (2007) Short-term results using Kurz titanium ossicular implants. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264:21–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Asai M, Huber AM, Goode RL (1999) Analysis of the best site on the stapes footplate for ossicular chain reconstruction. Acta Otolaryngol 119:356–361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jackson CG, Glasscock ME 3rd, Schwaber MK, Nissen AJ, Christiansen SG, Smith PG (1983) Ossicular chain reconstruction: the TORP and PORP in chronic ear disease. Laryngoscope 93:981–988CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Glasscock ME 3rd (1976) Ossicular chain reconstruction. Laryngoscope 86:211–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brackmann DE (1993) Tympanoplasty with mastoidectomy: canal wall up procedures. Am J Otol 14:380–382PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Murugasu E, Puria S, Roberson JB Jr (2005) Malleus-to-footplate versus malleus-to-stapes-head ossicular reconstruction prostheses: temporal bone pressure gain measurements and clinical audiological data. Otol Neurotol 26:572–582CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vincent R, Rovers M, Mistry N, Oates J, Sperling N, Grolman W (2011) Ossiculoplasty in intact stapes and malleus patients: a comparison of PORPs versus TORPs with malleus relocation and silastic banding techniques. Otol Neurotol 32:616–625CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Quesnel S, Teissier N, Viala P, Couloigner V, Van Den Abbeele T (2010) Long term results of ossiculoplasties with partial and total titanium Vario Kurz prostheses in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 74:1226–1229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moretz WH Jr (1998) Ossiculoplasty with an intact stapes: superstructure versus footplate prosthesis placement. Laryngoscope 108:1–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sen GL, Reuter JA, Webster DE, Zhu L, Khavari PA (2010) DNMT1 maintains progenitor function in self-renewing somatic tissue. Nature 463:563–567CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hahn M, Dambacher S, Schotta G (2010) Heterochromatin dysregulation in human diseases. J Appl Physiol 109:232–242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li HM, Peng RR, Li J, Yin YP, Wang B, Cohen MS, Chen XS (2011) HIV incidence among men who have sex with men in China: a meta-analysis of published studies. PLoS One 6:e23431CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kobayashi T, Gyo K, Shinohara T, Yanagihara N (2002) Ossicular reconstruction using hydroxyapatite prostheses with interposed cartilage. Am J Otolaryngol 23:222–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Macias JD, Glasscock ME 3rd, Widick MH, Schall DG, Haynes DS, Josey AF (1995) Ossiculoplasty using the black hydroxylapatite hybrid ossicular replacement prostheses. Am J Otol 16:718–721PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shinohara T, Gyo K, Saiki T, Yanagihara N (2000) Ossiculoplasty using hydroxyapatite prostheses: long-term results. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 25:287–292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Slater PW, Rizer FM, Schuring AG, Lippy WH (1997) Practical use of total and partial ossicular replacement prostheses in ossiculoplasty. Laryngoscope 107:1193–1198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rust KR, Singleton GT, Wilson J, Antonelli PJ (1996) Bioglass middle ear prosthesis: long-term results. Am J Otol 17:371–374PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Coffey CS, Lee FS, Lambert PR (2008) Titanium versus nontitanium prostheses in ossiculoplasty. Laryngoscope 118:1650–1658CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Eleftheriadou A, Chalastras T, Georgopoulos S, Yiotakis J, Manolopoulos L, Iliadis I, Charalabopoulos K, Kandiloros D (2009) Long-term results of plastipore prostheses in reconstruction of the middle ear ossicular chain. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 71:284–288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fong JC, Michael P, Raut V (2010) Titanium versus autograft ossiculoplasty. Acta Otolaryngol 130:554–558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Michael P, Fong J, Raut V (2008) Kurz titanium prostheses in paediatric ossiculoplasty—short term results. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 72:1329–1333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nikolaou A, Bourikas Z, Maltas V, Aidonis A (1992) Ossiculoplasty with the use of autografts and synthetic prosthetic materials: a comparison of results in 165 cases. J Laryngol Otol 106:692–694CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Quaranta N, Fernandez-Vega Feijoo S, Piazza F, Zini C (2001) Closed tympanoplasty in cholesteatoma surgery: long-term (10 years) hearing results using cartilage ossiculoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 258:20–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schmerber S, Troussier J, Dumas G, Lavieille JP, Nguyen DQ (2006) Hearing results with the titanium ossicular replacement prostheses. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 263:347–354CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Siddiq MA, Raut VV (2007) Early results of titanium ossiculoplasty using the Kurz titanium prosthesis–a UK perspective. J Laryngol Otol 121:539–544PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Martins J, Silva H, Certal V, Amorim H, Carvalho C (2011) Osiculoplastia con prótesis de titanio. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 62:295–299CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Alaani A, Raut VV (2010) Kurz titanium prosthesis ossiculoplasty–follow-up statistical analysis of factors affecting one year hearing results. Auris Nasus Larynx 37:150–154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dornhoffer JL (1998) Hearing results with the Dornhoffer ossicular replacement prostheses. Laryngoscope 108:531–536CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gardner EK, Jackson CG, Kaylie DM (2004) Results with titanium ossicular reconstruction prostheses. Laryngoscope 114:65–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gehrking E (2010) Osteoplastic atticoantrotomy with autologous bone chips and a bony attic strut in cholesteatoma surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267:1055–1066CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hillman TA, Shelton C (2003) Ossicular chain reconstruction: titanium versus plastipore. Laryngoscope 113:1731–1735CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ho SY, Battista RA, Wiet RJ (2003) Early results with titanium ossicular implants. Otol Neurotol 24:149–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mardassi A, Deveze A, Sanjuan M, Mancini J, Parikh B, Elbedeiwy A, Magnan J, Lavieille JP (2011) Titanium ossicular chain replacement prostheses: prognostic factors and preliminary functional results. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 128:53–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rondini-Gilli E, Grayeli AB, Borges Crosara PF, El Garem H, Mosnier I, Bouccara D, Sterkers O (2003) Ossiculoplasty with total hydroxylapatite prostheses anatomical and functional outcomes. Otol Neurotol 24:543–547CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Truy E, Naiman AN, Pavillon C, Abedipour D, Lina-Granade G, Rabilloud M (2007) Hydroxyapatite versus titanium ossiculoplasty. Otol Neurotol 28:492–498CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yung M, Smith P (2010) Titanium versus nontitanium ossicular prostheses-a randomized controlled study of the medium-term outcome. Otol Neurotol 31:752–758CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zenner HP, Stegmaier A, Lehner R, Baumann I, Zimmermann R (2001) Open Tubingen titanium prostheses for ossiculoplasty: a prospective clinical trial. Otol Neurotol 22:582–589CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kim HH, Battista RA, Kumar A, Wiet RJ (2006) Should ossicular reconstruction be staged following tympanomastoidectomy. Laryngoscope 116:47–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Martin AD, Harner SG (2004) Ossicular reconstruction with titanium prosthesis. Laryngoscope 114:61–64CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Quaranta N, Zizzi S, Quaranta A (2011) Hearing results using titanium ossicular replacement prosthesis in intact canal wall tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma. Acta Otolaryngol 131:36–40CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Black B (1991) A universal ossicular replacement prosthesis: clinical trials of 152 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 104:210–218PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Emmett JR, Shea JJ Jr, Moretz WH Jr (1986) Long-term experience with biocompatible ossicular implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 94:611–616PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Jung TT, Park SK (2005) Mediolateral graft tympanoplasty for anterior or subtotal tympanic membrane perforation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132:532–536CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Nguyen DQ, Morel N, Dumas G, Troussier J, Lavieille JP, Schmerber S (2005) Ossiculoplasty with KURZ titanium prosthesis. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 122:187–193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Reck R, Storkel S, Meyer A (1988) Bioactive glass-ceramics in middle ear surgery. An 8-year review. Ann N Y Acad Sci 523:100–106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Silverstein H, McDaniel AB, Lichtenstein R (1986) A comparison of PORP, TORP, and incus homograft for ossicular reconstruction in chronic ear surgery. Laryngoscope 96:159–165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kelly DJ, Prendergast PJ, Blayney AW (2003) The effect of prosthesis design on vibration of the reconstructed ossicular chain: a comparative finite element analysis of four prostheses. Otol Neurotol 24:11–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Colletti V, Carner M, Colletti L (2009) TORP vs round window implant for hearing restoration of patients with extensive ossicular chain defect. Acta Otolaryngol 129:449–452CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Fisch U (1978) Reconstruction of the ossicular chain (author’s transl). HNO 26:53–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Rathert P, Dhayalan A, Murakami M, Zhang X, Tamas R, Jurkowska R, Komatsu Y, Shinkai Y, Cheng X, Jeltsch A (2008) Protein lysine methyltransferase G9a acts on non-histone targets. Nat Chem Biol 4:344–346CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sheehy JL, Crabtree JA (1973) Tympanoplasty: staging the operation. Laryngoscope 83:1594–1621CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Shelton C, Sheehy JL (1990) Tympanoplasty: review of 400 staged cases. Laryngoscope 100:679–681PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Vrabec JT, Stierman K, Grady JJ (2002) Hydroxyapatite prosthesis extrusion. Otol Neurotol 23:653–656CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Huttenbrink KB, Zahnert T, Beutner D, Hofmann G (2004) The cartilage guide: a solution for anchoring a columella-prosthesis on footplate. Laryngorhinootologie 83:450–456CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Huiqian Yu
    • 1
  • Yingzi He
    • 2
  • Yusu Ni
    • 1
  • Yunfeng Wang
    • 1
  • Na Lu
    • 1
  • Huawei Li
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Shanghai Eye and ENT Hospital, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations