European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 270, Issue 8, pp 2225–2229

Is there any predictor for tinnitus outcome in different types of otologic surgery?

  • Mehmet Habesoglu
  • Tulay Erden Habesoglu
  • Cem Karatas
  • Ahmet Tosun
  • Ali Okan Gursel
  • Cagatay Oysu
Otology

Abstract

Our objective was to determine the effect of different types of otologic surgeries on tinnitus symptoms. Our study consisted of 63 patients who were operated between January and June 2011. Variables such as age, sex, presence of systemic diseases, location and size of the perforation, duration of dry period, type of otological surgery, peroperative presence of cholesteatoma, timpanosclerotic plaques and ossicular chain discontinuity were evaluated. Audiologic evaluation by pure tone audiometry and assessment of THI scores were conducted before surgery and 12 weeks after surgery. There was a very significant difference between preoperative and postoperative mean THI scores (p < 0.01). There was no significant effect of presence of ossicular discontinuity, cholesteatoma, tympanosclerotic plaques, type of surgery or duration of symptoms on the difference of preoperative and postoperative THI scores (p > 0.05). There was a significant positive relationship between audiological gain and THI scores (r = 0.355, p < 0.01). In our study, we investigated the relationship between many types of otological surgeries including some preoperative and peroperative pathological findings and tinnitus. As a result, we found that postoperative audiologic gain is an important factor determining outcome of tinnitus in these types of otological surgeries.

Keywords

Tinnitus handicap inventory Otological surgeries Tinnitus 

References

  1. 1.
    Henry JA, Dennis KC, Schechter MA (2005) General review of tinnitus: prevalence, mechanisms, effects, and management. J Speech Lang Hear Res 48:1204–1235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fornaro M, Martino M (2010) Tinnitus psychopharmacology: a comprehensive review of its pathomechanisms and management. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 24:209–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crummer RW, Hassan GA (2004) Diagnostic approach to tinnitus. Am Fam Physician 69:120–126PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Del Bo L, Ambrosetti U (2007) Hearing aids for the treatment of tinnitus. Prog Brain Res 166:341–345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lim JJ, Lu PK, Koh DS, Eng SP (2010) Impact of tinnitus as measured by the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory among tinnitus sufferers in Singapore. Singapore Med J 51:551–557PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sweetow RW, Levy MC (1990) Tinnitus severity scaling for diagnostic/therapeutic usage. Hear Instrum 41:20–21Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kuk FK, Tyler RS, Russell D et al (1990) The psychometric properties of a tinnitus handicap questionnaire. Ear Hear 11:434–445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Halford JB, Anderson SD (1991) Tinnitus severity measured by a subjective scale, audiometry and clinical judgement. J Laryngol Otol 105:89–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wilson PH, Henry J, Bowen M et al (1991) Tinnitus reaction questionnaire: psychometric properties of a measure of distress associated with tinnitus. J Speech Hear Res 34:197–201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hallam RS (1996) Manual of the tinnitus questionnaire (TQ). Psychological Corporation, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Newman CW, Jacobson GP, Spitzer JB (1996) Development of the tinnitus handicap ınventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122:143–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Newman CW, Sandridge SA, Jacobson GP (1998) Psychometric adequacy of the tinnitus handicap ınventory (THI) for evaluating treatment outcome. J Am Acad Audiol 9:153–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lima Ada S, Sanchez TG, Bonadia Moraes MF et al (2007) The effect of timpanoplasty on tinnitus in patients with conductive hearing loss: a six month follow-up. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 73:384–389PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim DK, Park SN, Kim MJ et al (2011) Tinnitus in patients with chronic otitis media before and after middle ear surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268:1443–1448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schaette R, Turtle C, Munro KJ (2012) Reversible induction of phantom auditory sensations through simulated unilateral hearing loss. PLoS ONE 7(6):e35238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baba S, Yagi T, Fujikura T (2004) Subjective evaluation and overall satisfaction after tympanoplasty for chronic simple suppurative otitis media. J Nihon Med Sch 71:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saito T, Kimura Y, Yamada T et al (1999) Efficacy of middle ear surgery for patients with hearing aids and middle ear disease. Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 102:347–353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sachio T, Hiroshi K, Chie K et al (1999) Tympanoplasty and tinnitus. Practica Otologica 92:845–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mehmet Habesoglu
    • 1
  • Tulay Erden Habesoglu
    • 2
  • Cem Karatas
    • 2
  • Ahmet Tosun
    • 1
  • Ali Okan Gursel
    • 2
  • Cagatay Oysu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryUmraniye Education and Research HospitalIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryFatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Research HospitalIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations