Advertisement

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 270, Issue 4, pp 1355–1359 | Cite as

Postoperative nasal symptoms associated with an endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach

  • Boo-Young Kim
  • Hye Lim Son
  • Seok-Gu Kang
  • Sung Won KimEmail author
  • Yong Kil Hong
  • Sin-Soo Jeun
  • Soo Whan Kim
  • Jin Hee Cho
  • Yong Jin Park
Rhinology

Abstract

Recent studies have indicated the usefulness of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach (EETSA). A few studies have reported on the postoperative nasal symptoms of patients who have undergone EETSA. Therefore, we adopted a rhinologic perspective to compare preoperative and postoperative nasal symptoms after performing a binostril, four-hand EETSA. Patients who were scheduled to undergo binostril, four-hand EETSA underwent preoperative nasal evaluation using the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE), Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20 (SNOT-20), and a visual analogue scale (VAS) to assess several nasal symptoms. Repeat testing was performed 6 months postoperatively. Paired Student’s t tests were used to compare preoperative and postoperative scores. A total of 142 patients who underwent a binostril, four-hand EETSA were included in this study. We found no statistically significant differences between preoperative and postoperative NOSE, total SNOT-20 scores, or scores on the VAS for nasal obstruction, sneezing, rhinorrhea, snoring, or facial pain. However, VAS of olfactory change increased significantly after EETSA (p < 0.05). The binostril, four-hand EETSA would be a useful method because it permits operative manipulability and a wide visual field for skull base lesions. However, rhinologists must consider postoperative nasal symptoms and perform a proper preoperative examination, especially with regard to the olfactory function, and inform patients scheduled for EETSA of potential postoperative changes.

Keywords

Nasal symptom Endoscope Transsphenoidal approach 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Seoul St. Mary’s Clinical Medical Research Program year of 2010 through the Catholic University of Korea.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Rosegay H (1981) Cushing’s legacy to transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg 54:448–454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adams CB, Burke CW (1993) Current modes of treatment of pituitary tumors. Br J Neurosurg 7:123–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Senior BA, Ebbert CS, Bednarski KK et al (2008) Minimally invasive pituitary surgery. Laryngoscope 118:1842–1855PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hart CK, Theodosopoulos PV, Zimmer LA (2010) Olfactory changes after endoscopic pituitary tumor resection. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 142:95–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Orlandi RR, Lanza DC, Bolger WE, Cleriico DM, Kennedy DW (1999) The forgotten turbinate: the role of the superior turbinate in endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol 13:251–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rotenberg BW, Saunders S, Duggal N (2011) Olfactory outcomes after endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Laryngoscope 121:1611–1613PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ahn JH, Lee BJ, Kim JH, Kim YJ (2000) Postoperative Nasal Symptoms after Transseptal Transsphenoidal Hypophysectomy. Korean J Otolaryngol 43:520–522Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Balaker AE, Bergsneider M, Martin NA, Wang MB (2010) Evolution of sinonasal symptoms following endoscopic anterior skull base surgery. Skull Base 20:245–251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zanation AM, Carrau RL, Synderman CH et al (2009) Nasoseptal flap reconstruction of high flow intraoperative cerebral spinal fluid leaks during endoscopic skull base surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 23:58–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dorty RL (2001) Olfaction. Annu Rev Psychol 52:423–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haruna S, Otori N, Moriyama H, Kamio M (2007) Endoscopic transnasal transethmosphenoidal approach for pituitary tumors: assessment of technique and postoperative findings of nasal and paranasal cavities. Auris Nasus Larynx 34:57–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Boo-Young Kim
    • 1
  • Hye Lim Son
    • 1
  • Seok-Gu Kang
    • 2
  • Sung Won Kim
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yong Kil Hong
    • 2
  • Sin-Soo Jeun
    • 2
  • Soo Whan Kim
    • 1
  • Jin Hee Cho
    • 1
  • Yong Jin Park
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck SurgerySeoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of KoreaSeoulKorea
  2. 2.Department of NeurosurgeryCollege of Medicine, The Catholic University of KoreaSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations