Advertisement

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 270, Issue 2, pp 505–510 | Cite as

Investigation of noise levels generated by otologic drills

  • Carsten V. DalchowEmail author
  • K. C. Hagemeier
  • A. Muenscher
  • R. Knecht
  • F. Kameier
Otology

Abstract

Drilling during temporal bone surgery may result in temporary or permanent noise-induced hearing loss or tinnitus. This has practical implications for both the patient and the surgeon. Different surgical drill devices, routinely used in temporal bone surgery, are examined referring to their emitted sound levels and sound transport. Two surgical drills were used on a brass tubing and a steel wire to simulate sound generation during temporal bone surgery. Overview measurements were performed on human cadaver in a medical laboratory. A set-up in a silent chamber was chosen to exclude external sound sources. The noise emissions and the vibration generated by a silver diamond bur and a cutting drill (Rose bur) were registered when used on a brass tubing and a solid steel wire with sound level meter and a non-contact laser vibrometer. The highest sound rate generated by the diamond burr did not exceed 63 dB(A) when used on a solid steel wire, whereas the cutting burr emitted 76 dB(A). Both drills produced lower sound levels on the brass tubing. Again the cutting burr topped the diamond burr with 68 dB(A) against 56 dB(A). The sound emission did not exceed 76 dB(A) outside a radius 4 cm around the drill location. In conclusion, sound emission generated by different surgical burs routinely used in temporal bone surgery is lower than expected. Still, within a small radius around those burs high sound pressure levels may be induced into surrounding structures such as ossicles, labyrinth, and cochlear. Still damage is feasible when using surgical drills for a longer time period close to sensitive structures.

Keywords

Sound emission Otologic bur Middle ear surgery Temporal bone 

References

  1. 1.
    Hagemeier CK (2004) Acoustic and vibration analysis of otologic drills (in German Language), Diploma Thesis. University of applied sciences, DuesseldorfGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huttenbrink KB (1991) Cochlear damage caused by middle ear surgeries. Laryngorhinootologie 70:66–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Uruquhart AC, McIntosh WA, Bodenstein NP (1992) Drill-generated sensorineural hearing loss following mastoid surgery. Laryngoscope 102:1444Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Helms J (1976) Acoustic trauma from the bone cutting burr. J Laryngol Otol 90:1143–1149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davis H (1950) Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 88:1PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parkin JL, Wood GS, Wood RD, McCandless GA (1980) Drill- and suction-generated noise in mastoid surgery. Arch Otolaryngol 106:92–96CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kyelen P, Stjernvall JE, Arlinger S (1977) Variables affecting the drill-generated noise levels in ear surgery. Acta Otolaryngol 84:252–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prasad KR, Reddy KT (2003) Live recordings of sound levels during the use of powered instruments in ENT surgery. J Laryngol Otol 117:532–535PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kyelen P, Arlinger S (1976) Drill-generated noise levels in ear surgery. Acta Otolaryngol 82:402–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carsten V. Dalchow
    • 1
    Email author
  • K. C. Hagemeier
    • 2
  • A. Muenscher
    • 1
  • R. Knecht
    • 1
  • F. Kameier
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity Medical Centre Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Fluid Mechanics and AcousticsUniversity of Applied SciencesDuesseldorfGermany

Personalised recommendations