European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 270, Issue 2, pp 527–533 | Cite as

Acellular dermal (alloderm) grafts versus silastic sheets implants for management of empty nose syndrome

  • Magdy Eisa Saafan


The objective of the study is to conduct a prospective randomized blind clinical study comparing the efficacy and safety of use of acellular dermal (alloderm) grafts versus silastic sheets submucosal implants for management of empty nose syndrome (ENS). A total of 24 patients with a clinical diagnosis of ENS were randomly distributed in two equal groups: silastic implant group and alloderm implant group according to the type of implant used to rebuild the nose. This implant was inserted in submucoperichondrial and/or submucoperiosteal pockets fashioned along the septum, nasal floor, and lateral nasal wall. Subjective evaluation was done by reviewing the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-25), while objective evaluation was done by anterior rhinoscopy and nasal endoscopy. Both groups experienced a significant improvement after surgery (the mean SNOT-25 score before implantation was 61.4 compared to 33.6 after implantation in silastic implant group, while in alloderm implant group, it was 63.7 before surgery compared to 34.2 after implantation). There was no statistical evidence for a significant difference between the two groups. Objective evaluation showed rapid healing with no signs of implant infection, rejection, or allergic reaction in both groups. Both graft materials are well suited to this procedure with no statistical evidence for a significant difference between them. The silastic implant is inert and yet incorporated into the surrounding tissue because of the fashioned macropores. It is available and inexpensive. Acellular dermis graft is reliable, predictable, and readily shaped. Patients of both groups showed marked subjective and objective improvements. The surgical procedure is safe and relatively simple to perform.


Empty nose syndrome ENS Alloderm Silastic Prospective Randomized Postsurgical 


Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise with any organization.


  1. 1.
    Chhabra N, Houser SM (2009) The diagnosis and management of empty nose syndrome. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 42:311–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Houser SM (2007) Surgical treatment for empty nose syndrome. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133:858–863PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moore EJ, Kern EB (2001) Atrophic rhinitis: a review of 242 cases. Am J Rhinol 15(6):355–361PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oluwole M, Mills RP (1994) An audit of the early complications of turbinectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 76(5):339–341PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rice DH (2000) Rebuilding the inferior turbinate with hydroxyapatite cement. Ear Nose Throat J 79(4):276–277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Payne SC (2009) Empty nose syndrome: what we are really talking about? Otolaryngol Clin North Am 42:331–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wrobel BB, Bien AG, Holbrook EH et al (2006) Decreased nasal mucosal sensitivity in older subjects. Am J Rhinol 20(3):364–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wu X, Myers AC, Goldstone AC et al (2006) Localization of nerve growth factor and its receptors in the human nasal mucosa. J Allergy Clin Immunol 118(2):428–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mikkelsen T, Werner MU, Lassen B, Kehlet H (2004) Pain and sensory dysfunction 6 to 12 months after inguinal herniotomy. Anesth Analg 99(1):146–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Friedman M, Ibrahim H, Lee G (2002) A simplified technique for treatment of atrophic and hypotrophic rhinitis. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 13(211):214Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rice DH (2000) Rebuilding the inferior turbinate with hydroxyapatite cement. Ear Nose Throat J 79:276–277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sclafani AP, Romo T, Jacono AA, McCormick S, Cocker R, Parker A (2000) Evaluation of acellular dermal graft in sheet (Alloderm) and injectable (micronized Alloderm) forms for soft tissue augmentation. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2(130):6Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goldenberg D, Danino J, Netzer A et al (2000) Plastipore implants in the surgical treatment of atrophic rhinitis: technique and results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122(6):794–797PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Otolaryngology and Head and Neck SurgeryTanta Faculty of Medicine and University HospitalsTantaEgypt

Personalised recommendations