Return to theatre in secondary post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage: a comparison of coblation and dissection techniques
- 312 Downloads
- 6 Citations
Abstract
The aim of this study is to examine the incidence of return to theatre (RTT) for post-operative haemorrhage following coblation and dissection tonsillectomy and to investigate those that required RTT more than 10 days post-surgery. Retrospective review of post-tonsillectomy haemorrhages requiring RTT from April 2005 to March 2009 was conducted. Of 2,541 tonsillectomies performed, 81% were by coblation and 19% by dissection methods. The overall RTT rate was 1.7%. No difference was found in the overall RTT rates for primary and secondary haemorrhage between the two techniques. However, the overall RTT rates for primary and secondary haemorrhage were higher in adults than children (P = 0.0456 and P = 0.0215, respectively). RTT for secondary haemorrhage during the first ten post-operative days occurred in both coblation and dissection tonsillectomy with no significant difference. After the first post-operative week, late secondary bleeding requiring RTT occurred only in the coblation group (P = 0.0676). Four patients required blood transfusion; all were in the coblation group, three of which were required during RTT in the late secondary haemorrhage (after 10 days). The post-operative RTT rates for coblation tonsillectomy did not reveal a change of trend over the 4-year study period. Our RTT rate for secondary haemorrhage is higher than earlier published results. A learning curve could not be identified in RTT for coblation tonsillectomy haemorrhage. Late secondary haemorrhages requiring surgical intervention have only been identified in cases performed by coblation and could potentially be life threatening as 33% (3/9) required blood transfusion. This phenomenon may be explained by a particular physiological healing process associated with coblation.
Keywords
Tonsillectomy Postoperative complications HaemorrhageNotes
Conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Worthington TC (1907) A simple method of excision of the faucial tonsil. JAMA 48:1761–1762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Timms MS, Temple RH (2002) Coblation tonsillectomy: a double blind randomised controlled study. J Laryngol Otol 116:450–452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Belloso A, Chidambaram A, Morar P, Timms MS (2003) Coblation tonsillectomy versus dissection tonsillectomy: post-operative haemorrhage. Laryngoscope 113:2010–2013PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Temple RH, Timms MS (2006) Paediatric coblation tonsillectomy. Int J Paediatr Otorhinolaryngol 61:195–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.National Prospective Tonsillectomy Audit: final report of an audit carried out in England and Northern Ireland between July 2003 and September 2004. Available at: http://www.rcseng.ac.uk/rcseng/content/publications/docs/national_prospective.html. Accessed on February 2, 2010
- 6.Alexander RJ, Kukreja R, Ford GR (2004) Secondary post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage and informed consent. J Laryngol Otol 118:937–940PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Divi V, Benninger M (2005) Post-operative tonsillectomy bleed: coblation versus non coblation. Laryngoscope 115:31–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Schrock A, Send T, Heukamp L, Gerstner AO, Bootz F, Jakob M (2009) The role of histology and other risk factors for post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266:1983–1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Attner P, Haraldsson PO, Hemlin C, Hessén Soderman AC (2009) A 4-year consecutive study of post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 71:273–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Windfuhr J, Ulbrich T (2001) Post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage: results of a 3-month follow-up. Ear Nose Throat J 80:795–798Google Scholar
- 11.Woloszko J, Gilbride C (2000) Coblation technology: plasma-mediated ablation for otolaryngology applications. Proc SPIE 3907:306. doi: 10.1117/12.386267 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Magdy EA, Elwany S, el-Daly AS, Abdel-Hadi M, Morshedy MA (2008) Coblation tonsillectomy: a prospective, double-blind, randomised, clinical and histopathological comparison with dissection-ligation, monopolar electrocautery and laser tonsillectomies. J Laryngol Otol 122(3):282–290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Mckenzie AL (1990) Physics of thermal processes in laser-tissue interaction. Phys Med Biol 35:1175–1210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Yesildaglar N, Zikulnig L, Gratacos E, Devlieger RSchroder HJ, Deprest J et al (2000) Bipolar Coagulation with small diameter forceps in animal models for in utero cord obliteration. Hum Reprod 15:865–868PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Toft JG, Guldfred LA, Holmgaard Larsen BI, Becker BC (2009) Novel tonsillectomy technique. Ugeskr Laeger 171:45–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Chinpairoj S, Feldman MD, Saunders JC, Thaler EA (2001) Comparison of monopolar electrosurgery to a new multipolar electrosurgical system in a rat model. Laryngoscope 111:213–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Swibel Rosenthal LH, Benninger MS, Stone CH, Zacharek MA (2009) Wound healing in the rabbit paranasal sinuses after coblation: evaluation for use in endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 23:360–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Swibel Rosenthal LH, Benninger MS, Stone CH, Zacharek MA (2010) Wound healing in the paranasal sinuses after coblation, part II: evaluation for endoscopic sinus surgery using a sheep model. Am J Rhinol Allergy 24:464–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Noordzij JP, Affleck BD (2006) Coblation versus unipolar electrocautery tonsillectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study in adult patient. Laryngoscope 116:1303–1309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar