European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 265, Issue 9, pp 1121–1123 | Cite as

The AESOP robot system for video-assisted rigid endoscopic laryngosurgery

  • M. Alessandrini
  • A. De PadovaEmail author
  • B. Napolitano
  • A. Camillo
  • E. Bruno
Short Communication


Surgeons may occasionally encounter difficulty in visualizing the whole larynx with a direct laryngoscope. In such cases, rigid endoscopic laryngosurgery using a direct laryngoscope is an optimal solution. Multidirectional examination of the larynx using rigid endoscopes during direct laryngoscopy, leads to better control and management of the ventricle, inferior surface of the vocal fold and subglottis, and the anterior commissure. Currently, 0°, 30°, 70° and 120° angled rigid telescopes are used worldwide. Our experience in telescopic endolaryngeal surgery provided us the opportunity to work with AESOP 3000 (automated endoscope system for optimal positioning), coupling a robotic arm to a rigid endolaryngeal telescope. The use of this device allows the surgeon to control the field of view and operate with both hands. A total of 20 patients presenting a laryngeal lesion were randomly selected and included in this study undergoing a robot-assisted procedure. Three of 20 patients presented a difficult laryngeal exposure with direct laryngoscopy due to a rigid, short neck (1 male, 1 female) and prominent teeth (1 male). We used Karl Storz Hopkins II long rigid endoscopes having 0°, 30° and 70° direction of view, a Storz Xenon 300 cold light, a Storz Tricam SL camera, the Kleinsasser direct laryngoscope. The instruments we used are all commercially available for microlaryngeal surgery and included upward curved instruments in case of difficult laryngeal exposure. The operative equipment was the same for all procedures. We evaluated the acquisition of skills in controlling the AESOP 3000, the feasibility of a single surgeon performing procedures with this machine, and any advantages that it might offer to endolaryngeal surgery. The use of robotic devices improves the precision of surgical procedures, offering surgeons a more comfortable working position, particularly for longer procedures, and without an assistant to hold the camera.


Laryngosurgery Microlaryngoscopy Endoscopy Robotic system 


  1. 1.
    Ballantyne GH (2002) Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results. Surg Endosc 16(10):1389–1402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eryilmaz A, Akmansu H, Topcu E, Acar A, Korkmaz H (2004) The role of 70-degree telescopic examination during direct laryngoscopic evaluation of laryngeal cancers. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 261(5):267–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hazey JW, Melvin WS (2004) Robot-assisted general surgery. Semin Laparosc Surg 11(2):107–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jacobs LK, Shayani V, Sackier JM (1997) Determination of learning curve of AESOP robot. Surg Endosc 11(1):54–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kawaida M, Fukuda H, Kohno N (1998) Multidirectional observations of the larynx using transurethral rigid endoscopes during direct laryngoscopy. J Laryngol Otol 112(5):464–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kawaida M, Fukuda H, Kohno N (2001) Video-assisted rigid endoscopic laryngosurgery: application to cases with difficult laryngeal exposure. J Voice 15(2):305–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kleinsasser O (1968) Microlaryngoscopy and endolaryngeal microsurgery. WB Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kraft BM, Jager C, Kraft K, Leibl BJ, Bittner R (2004) The AESOP robot system in laparoscopic surgery: increased risk or advantage for surgeon and patient? Surg Endosc 18(8):1216–1223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lore JM Jr (1987) Telescopic endolaryngeal surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 96(5):525–526PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morgado PF, Abrahao M (1999) Angled telescopic surgery, an approach for laryngeal diagnosis and surgery without suspension. Sao Paulo Med J 117(5):224–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Richtsmeier WJ, Scher RL (1997) Telescopic laryngeal and pharyngeal surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 106(12):995–1001PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Remacle M, Eckel HE, Antonelli A et al (2000) Endoscopic cordectomy. A proposal for a classification by the Working Committee, European Laryngological Society. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 257(4):227–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Unger SW, Unger HM, Bass RT (1994) AESOP robotic arm. Surg Endosc 8(9):1131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Alessandrini
    • 1
  • A. De Padova
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • B. Napolitano
    • 1
  • A. Camillo
    • 1
  • E. Bruno
    • 1
  1. 1.ENT DepartmentUniversity of Rome “Tor Vergata”RomeItaly
  2. 2.Policlinico “Tor Vergata”RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations