A novel stenting technique in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy
- 79 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
The objective of our study was to evaluate in a prospective noncomparative case series, the clinical efficacy and the results of modified T-tube insertion instead of silicone tube in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EDCR). Following ophthalmologic examinations, 22 patients (16 female, 6 male) suffering from recurrent chronic epiphora with postsaccal stenosis for whom DCR was indicated, underwent EDCR at Dumlupinar University Hospital by an otorhinolaryngologist and an ophthalmologist between the years 2006 and 2007. Instead of inserting a classic silicone tube passed through canaliculi and knotted inside the nose, a modified T-tube was used, without passing it through punctum, and was placed to stoma with a less traumatic endonasal endoscopic technique. The medial wall of the sac was incised vertically and the T-tube was placed horizontal to the incision. Postoperatively, the patients were evaluated by endoscopic controls in the first, third, sixth, and twelfth months to evaluate T-tube localization and rhinostomy opening site. The success was defined as resolution of epiphora with patent ostium after evaluation by irrigation and nasal endoscopy. Eighteen patients (82%) showed complete resolution of epiphora at 12-months of follow-up. Re-stenosis was observed only in four cases, one in the sixth and the other in the ninth postoperative months. Granulation tissue formation near the rhinostomy site was seen in one patient, which did not cause any functional problem. The success rate was calculated as 82%. We conclude that modified T-tube placement in EDCR seems to be a practical and less traumatic technique. This is also a cheaper method besides being less traumatic and easier to perform than canalicular stenting. It can be considered as a useful alternative to the classic silicon tubes in cases of epiphora resulting from the postsaccal stenosis.
Keywords
Nasolacrimal duct Dacryocystorhinostomy T-tubeReferences
- 1.Dortzbach RK, France TD, Kushner BJ, Gonnering RS (1982) Silicone intubation for obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct in children. Am J Ophthalmol 94:585–590PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Emmerich KH, Busse H, Meyer-Rusenberg HW (1994) Dacryocystorhinostomia externa. Ophthalmology 91:395–398Google Scholar
- 3.Glatt HJ (1991) Dacryocystoplasty: an oculoplastic surgeon’s perspective (letter). Radiology 180:289–290PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Hartikainen J, Antila J, Varpula M, Puukka P, Seppa H, Grenman R (1998) Prospective randomized comparision of endonasal endoscopic DCR and external DCR. Laryngoscope 108:1861–1866PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Heermann H (1958) Über endonasale chirurgic unter verwendung des binoocularen mikroskopes. Arch Ohr Nas Kehlkopfheilk 171:295–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Hurwitz JJ (1996) Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. In: Hurwittz JJ (ed) The lacrimal system. Lipp-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, pp 317–321Google Scholar
- 7.Maden A (1995) Okuloplastik Cerrahi. Punto Yayıncılık, Izmir, pp 286Google Scholar
- 8.Massaro BM, Gonnering RS, Harris GJ (1990) Endonasal laser dacryocystorhinotomy: a new approach to nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Arch Ophthalmol 108:1172–1176PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Metson RB (1995) Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: primary and revision cases. In: Stankiewicz JA (ed) Advanced enscopic sinus surgery. Mosby Year Book, St Louis, pp 127–135Google Scholar
- 10.Metson RB (1991) Endoscopic surgery for lacrimal obstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 104:473–479PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Metson RB (1990) The endoscopic approach for revision DCR. Laryngoscope 100:1344–1347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Metson RB, Woog JJ, Puliafito CA (1994) Endoscopic laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope 104:269–274PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Munk PL, Lin DT, Morris DC (1990) Epiphora: treatment by means of dacryocystoplasty with ballon dilation of the nasolacrimal drainage apparatus. Radiology 177:687–690PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Quickert MH, Dryden RM (1970) Probes for intubation in lacrimal drainage. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 74:431–433PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Rosen N, Mordechai S, Moverman DC, Rosner M (1989) Dacryocystorhinotomy with silicone tubes; evaluation of 253 cases. Ophthalmic Surg 20:115–119PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Smirnov G, Tuomilehto H, Terasvirta M, Nuutinen J, Seppa J (2006) Silicone tubing after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: is it necessary? Am J Rhinol 20:600–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Synder J, Rosell LA (1986) Dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope 78:411–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Tos M, Balle V, Anderson R (1986) Dacryocystorhinostomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 95:352–355PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Toti A (1904) Nuevo metodo conservatore di cura radicale delle supporazini chronice del sacco lacrymale. Clin Med Firenze 10:385–389Google Scholar
- 20.Turbet KJ, Custer PL (1995) External DCR; surgical success, patient satisfaction, and economic cost. Ophthalmology 102:1065–1070Google Scholar
- 21.Walland MJ, Rose GE (1994) The effect of silicone intubation on failure and infection rates after DCR. Ophthalmic Surg 25:597–600PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Weidenbecher M, Hosemann W, Buhr W (1994) Endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: results in 56 patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 103:363–367PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.West JM (1910) A window resection of the nasal duct in cases of stenosis. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 12:654–658PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Woog JJ, Kennedy RH, Custer PL, Kaltreider SA, Meyer DR, Camara JG (2001) Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology 108:2369–2377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Woog JJ, Metson R, Puliafito CA (1993) Holmium-YAG endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol 116:1–10PubMedGoogle Scholar