Clinical subgroups and antifungal susceptibilities in fungal culture-positive patients with chronic rhinosinusitis
- 98 Downloads
- 6 Citations
Abstract
The goal of this study was to investigate clinical characteristics of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in patients with positive fungal cultures. Fungal cultures were taken from 55 CRS patients and 20 healthy volunteers. Susceptibilities of isolated fungi to fluconazole, amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, and caspofungin were determined in CRS patients. Fungi grew in the cultures from 44 (80%) CRS patients and 17 (85%) healthy volunteers. Of the patients with positive fungal cultures, 5 (11.3%) had fungal hypersensitivity (FH), and 21 (47.7%) had eosinophilic mucin (EM). Fungal culture-positive patients with EM were more likely to be associated with presence of polyps and higher CT scores than those without EM (P < 0.05). All the patients with FH had EM and polyps, and CT scores of those patients were highest. The sensitivity rates of fungal isolates were 97.8% for amphotericin B, caspofungin, and voriconazole; 74.4% for itraconazole; and 6.4% for fluconazole. The presence of EM with or without FH leaded to more extended CRS, but a part of positive fungal cultures were together with EM in patients with CRS. Sensitivity to antifungal agents, except fluconazole, was high. Because many factors can contribute to the pathogenesis of CRS, medical treatment should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Keywords
Rhinosinusitis Pathogenesis Fungus AntifungalNotes
Acknowledgments
This study was supported financially by Baskent University Research Foundation (Project No. KA05/06), and was presented at the 3. National Rhinology Congress April 21–25, 2007, Turkey.
References
- 1.Benninger MS, Ferguson BJ, Hadley JA, Hamilos DL, Jacobs M, Kennedy DW, Lanza DC, Marple BF, Osguthorpe JD, Stankiewicz JA, Anon J, Denneny J, Emanuel I, Levine H (2003) Adult chronic rhinosinusitis: definitions, diagnosis, epidemiology, and pathophysiology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129(3 Suppl):S1–S32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Kennedy DW (2004) Pathogenesis of chronic rhinosinusitis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 193(Suppl):6–9Google Scholar
- 3.Ponikau JU, Sherris DA, Kern EB, Homburger HA, Frigas E, Gaffey TA, Roberts GD (1999) The diagnosis and incidence of allergic fungal sinusitis. Mayo Clin Proc 74:877–884PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Braun H, Buzina W, Freudenschuss K, Beham A, Stammberger H (2003) Eosinophilic fungal rhinosinusitis: a common disorder in Europe? Laryngoscope 113:264–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Taylor MJ, Ponikau JU, Sherris DA, Kern EB, Gaffey TA, Kephart G, Kita H (2002) Detection of fungal organisms in eosinophilic mucin using a fluorescein-labeled chitin-specific binding protein. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:377–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Collins M, Nair S, Smith W, Kette F, Gillis D, Wormald PJ (2004) Role of local immunoglobulin E production in the pathophysiology of noninvasive fungal sinusitis. Laryngoscope 114:1242–1246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Pant H, Kette FE, Smith WB, Macardle PJ, Wormald PJ (2006) Eosinophilic mucus chronic rhinosinusitis: clinical subgroups or a homogeneous pathogenic entity? Laryngoscope 116:1241–1247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Fokkens W, Lund V, Mullol J; European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis, Nasal Polyps group (2007) European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2007. Rhinol Suppl 20:1–136PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Rains BM 3rd, Mineck CW (2003) Treatment of allergic fungal sinusitis with high-dose itraconazole. Am J Rhinol 17:1–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Kennedy DW, Kuhn FA, Hamilos DL, Zinreich SJ, Butler D, Warsi G, Pfister PJ, Tavakkol A (2005) Treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with high-dose oral terbinafine: a double blind, placebo-controlled study. Laryngoscope 115:1793–1799PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Ponikau JU, Sherris DA, Kita H, Kern EB (2002) Intranasal antifungal treatment in 51 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 110:862–866PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Ricchetti A, Landis BN, Maffioli A, Giger R, Zeng C, Lacroix JS (2002) Effect of anti-fungal nasal lavage with amphotericin B on nasal polyposis. J Laryngol Otol 116:261–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Jen A, Kacker A, Huang C, Anand V (2004) Fluconazole nasal spray in the treatment of allergic fungal sinusitis: a pilot study. Ear Nose Throat J 83:694–695Google Scholar
- 14.Ponikau JU, Sherris DA, Weaver A, Kita H (2005) Treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with intranasal amphotericin B: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind pilot trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 115:125–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Weschta M, Rimek D, Formanek M, Polzehl D, Podbielski A, Riechelmann H (2004) Topical antifungal treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 113:1122–1128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Weschta M, Rimek D, Formanek M, Podbielski A, Riechelmann H (2006) Effect of nasal antifungal therapy on nasal cell activation markers in chronic rhinosinusitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132:743–747PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Ebbens F, Scadding GK, Badia L, Hellings PW, Jorissen M, Mullol J, Cardesin A, Bachert C, van Zele TP, Dijkgraaf MG, Lund V, Fokkens WJ (2006) Amphotericin B nasal lavages: not a solution for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 118:1149–1156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Lanza DC, Kennedy DW (1997) Adult rhinosinusitis defined. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:S1–S7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Lund VJ, Mackay IS (1993) Staging in rhinosinusitus. Rhinology 31:183–184PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Espinel-Ingroff A (2001) Comparison of the Etest with the NCCLS M38-P method for antifungal susceptibility testing of common and emerging pathogenic filamentous fungi. J Clin Microbiol 39:1360–1367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (2002) Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. 2nd edn. Approved standard, NCCLS document M27-A2. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, WayneGoogle Scholar
- 22.Espinel-Ingroff A, Pfaller MA (2003) Susceptibility test methods: yeast and filamentous fungi. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC, Yolken RH (eds) Manual of clinical microbiology, 8th edn. ASM, Washington, pp 1880–1893Google Scholar
- 23.Shin S, Ponikau JU, Sherris DA, Congdon D, Frigas E, Homburger HA, Swanson MC, Gleich GJ, Kita H (2004) Chronic rhinosinusitis: an enhanced immune response to ubiquitous airborne fungi. J Allergy Clin Immunol 114:1369–1375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Rex JH, Stevens DA (2005) Systemic antifungal agents. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R (eds) Principles and practice of infectious diseases, 6th edn. Churchill Livingstone Company, Philadelphia, pp 502–514Google Scholar
- 25.Murr AH, Goldberg AN, Vesper S (2006) Fungal speciation using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QPCR) in patients with and without chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 116:1342–1348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Ragab A, Clement P, Vincken W, Nolard N, Simones F (2006) Fungal cultures of different parts of the upper and lower airways in chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinology 44:19–25PubMedGoogle Scholar