European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 264, Issue 10, pp 1171–1174 | Cite as

Day-case endoscopic sinus surgery using dissolvable haemostatic nasal packs: a pilot study

  • P. D. KarkosEmail author
  • T. Thinakararajan
  • P. Goodyear
  • V. R. Srinivasan


In a prospective pilot study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of dissolvable nasal packs (Sinu-knit) for control of post-operative bleeding in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), as well as potential complications of this novel packing material and patients’ satisfaction with the dissolvable nasal packs. The patients included were considered suitable for a day-case procedure. We excluded subjects under 16-year-old, as well as patients on warfarin or with any coexisting medical or social reasons rendering them unsuitable for a day-case procedure. The main outcome measures were: readmission rate, postoperative bleeding rate, any other postoperative complications and patient satisfaction survey (including management as a day case and views about the packs). Fifteen patients fulfilled our criteria and were enrolled in this study (between March and August 2005). Fourteen patients were able to go home on the same day. One patient stayed overnight because of vomiting. All operations were performed by the same surgeon and the same anaesthetist. There were no readmissions due to postoperative bleeding. All patients were followed up with rigid video-nasendoscopy weekly for three weeks with further reviews at 6 weeks, 3 months and a final follow-up 6 months postoperatively. No postoperative adhesions were seen on nasendoscopy up to 6 months postoperatively. Dissolvable packs appear to be safe and effective and can be used for day case sinus surgery. There is no need for packing removal, thus greater patients’ satisfaction.


Endoscopic sinus surgery Dissolvable Nasal packs Day case 


  1. 1.
    Shinkwin CA, Beasley N, Simo R, Rushton L, Jones NS (1996) Evaluation of Surgicel Nu-knit, Merocel and Vasolene gauze nasal packs: a randomized trial. Rhinology 34(1):41–3PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Genc E, Ergin NT, Bilezikci B (2004) Comparison of suture and nasal packing in rabbit noses. Laryngoscope 114(4):639–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rajapaksa SP, Cowin A, Adams D, Wormald PJ (2005) The effect of a hyaluronic acid-based nasal pack on mucosal healing in a sheep model of sinusitis. Am J Rhinol. 19(6):572–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jameson M, Gross CW, Kountakis SE (2006) FloSeal use in endoscopic sinus surgery: effect on postoperative bleeding and synechiae formation. Am J Otolaryngol. 27(2):86–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brown PM, Fowler S, Ryan R, Rivron R (1998) ENT day surgery in England and Wales—an audit by the Royal College of Surgeons (Eng.) Comparative Audit Service. J Laryngol Otol 112(2):161–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    von Schoenberg M, Robinson P, Ryan R (1993) Nasal packing after routine nasal surgery—is it justified? J Laryngol Otol 107(10):902–5Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Watson MG, Campbell JB, Shenoi PM (1989) Nasal surgery: does the type of nasal pack influence the results? Rhinology 27(2):105–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Weber R, Hochapfel F, Draf W (2000) Packing and stents in endonasal surgery. Rhinology 38:49–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chandra RK, Conley DB, Haines GK 3rd, Kern RC (2005) Long-term effects of FloSeal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol 19(3):240–3PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. D. Karkos
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • T. Thinakararajan
    • 1
  • P. Goodyear
    • 1
  • V. R. Srinivasan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OtolaryngologyArrowe Park HospitalUpton, WirralUK
  2. 2.ChesterUK

Personalised recommendations