Advertisement

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 264, Issue 10, pp 1215–1222 | Cite as

Developing core sets for patients with head and neck cancer based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)

  • U. TschiesnerEmail author
  • A. Cieza
  • S. N. Rogers
  • J. Piccirillo
  • G. Funk
  • G. Stucki
  • A. Berghaus
Head and Neck

Abstract

Problems in functioning are frequently seen in survivors of head and neck cancer (HNC) and proof to have increasing impact on their quality of life. With the approval of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) by the World Health Assembly in May 2001, we can now rely on a globally accepted framework and classification system based on a bio-psycho-social mode to assess and compare functional outcome. To make the ICF-classification with more than 1.400 categories applicable to every-day clinical practice, ICF core sets are established. The objective of this paper is to outline the proposed development process for the ICF core set for HNC and to invite international experts to participate in this process. The ICF core set will be defined at a Consensus conference, which will integrate evidence from preparatory studies, namely: (a) a systematic literature review regarding the outcome measures of clinical trails and observational studies, (b) semi-structured patient interviews, (c) international experts participating in a internet-based survey and (d) cross-sectional, multi-center studies for clinical applicability. To validate the ICF core set field-testing will follow. The ICF provides useful standards of clinical rehabilitation practice, research and teaching. Its application stimulates comparability of outcome parameters, eventually improving understanding of functioning and disability. The ICF can function as a new language, simplifying communication and cooperation between various professional backgrounds and between health professionals and their patients eventually leading to a more effective and economic rehabilitation. The ICF core set for HNC is designed to translate the benefits of the ICF into clinical routine. The development of ICF core sets is an inclusive and open process. Anyone who wishes to actively participate is invited to contact the project coordinator (Uta.Tschiesner@med.uni-muenchen.de). Individuals, institutions and associations can be formally associated as partners of the project.

Keywords

International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Head and neck cancer ICF  Quality of life Functioning Disability 

References

  1. 1.
    Morton RP, Izzard ME (2003) Quality-of-life outcomes in head and neck cancer patients. World J Surg 2:884–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rogers SN, Miller RD, AliK, Minhas AB, Williams HF, Lowe D (2006) Patients persieved health statusfollowing primary surgery for oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 35:913–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee-Preston V, Steen IN, Kelly GC, Welch AR, Meikle D, Stafford FW, Wilson JA (2004) Optimizing the assessment of quality of life after laryngeal cancer treatment. J Laryngol Otol 118:432–438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aaronson NK (1988) Quality of life: what is it? How should it be measured?. Oncology 2:69–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rogers SN, Humphris G, Lowe D et al (1998) The impact of surgery for oral cancer on quality of life as measured by the Medical outcomes short form 36. Oral Oncol 34:171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    DAntonio LL, Zimmermann GJ, Cella DF, Long SA (1996) Quality of life and functional status measures in patients with head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122:482–487Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aaronson NK, Beckmann J (eds) (1986) The quality of life in cancer patients. EORTC study group on quality of life. J Psychosoc Oncol 4:43–53Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian B, Linn E et al (1993) The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 11(3):570–579PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    List MA, Bilir SP (2004) Functional outcomes in head and neck cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 14(2):178–189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stucki G, Sangha O (1997) Principles of rehabilitation. In: Klippel IJH, Dieppe IPA (eds) Rheumatology. Mosby, London, pp 11.1–11.14Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stucki G, Ewert T, Cieza AS (2004) Value and application of ICF in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 24(17):932–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    List MA, Stracks J (2000) Evaluation of quality of life in patients definitively treated for squamous carcinoma of the head and neck. Curr Opin Oncol 12:215–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al (1993) The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trilas in oncolgy. J Nat Cancer Inst 85:365–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bjordal K, de Graeff A, Fayers PM, Hammerlid E et al (2000) A 12 country field study of EORTC QLQ-C30 and the head and neck cancer specific module (EORTC QLO-H&N35) in head and neck cancer patients. Euro J Cancer 36:1796–1807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chandu A, Smith AC, Rogers SN (2006) Health-related quality of life in oral cancer: a review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64(3):495–502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    World Health Organization (2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health ICFGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/indexGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stucki G, Grimby G (2004) Foreword: applying the ICF in medicine. J Rehabil Med 44(3 Suppl):5–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cieza A, Stucki G (2004) New approaches to understand the impact on musculoscelletal conditions. Best practise and research Clin Rheumatol 18(2):141–154Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stucki G, Cieza A, Ewert T, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S, Üstün T B (2002) Application of the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) in clinical practice. Disabil Rehabil 24:281–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stucki G, Ewert T, Cieza A (2002) Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil 24(17):932–938PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stucki G, Cieza A, Ewert T, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S, Üstün TB (2002) Application of the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) in clinical practice. Disabil Rehabil 24:281–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    A list of collaborating partners and organizations: http://www.icf-research-branch.org/aboutus/partners.htm
  24. 24.
    Cieza A, Stucki A, Geyh S, Berteanu M et al (2004) ICF core sets for chronic ischemic heart disease. J Rehabil Med 44(Suppl):94–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stucki A, Stoll T, Cieza A, Weigl M et al (2004) ICF core sets for obstructive pulmonary disease. J Rehabil Med 44(Suppl):114–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Geyh S, Cieza A, Schouten J, Dickson H, Frommelt P, Omar Z, Kostanjsek N, Ring H, Stucki G (2004) ICF core set for stroke. Rehabil Med 44(Suppl):135–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cieza A, Ewert T, Üstün B, Chatterji S, Konstansjek N, Stucki G (2004) Development of ICF core sets for patients with chronic conditions. J Rehabil Med 44(3 Suppl):9–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brach M, Cieza A, Stucki G, Füßl M, Cole A, Ellerin B, Fialka-Moser V (2004) ICF core sets for breast cancer. J Rehabil Med 44(Suppl):121–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wright, ST, Pou A (2004) Neoplasms of the nose and paranasal sinuses; grand rounds presentation, UTMB, Dept. of Otolaryngol, http://www.utmb.edu/otoref/Grnds/Nose-sinus-CA-040519/Nose-sinus-CA-040519.htm
  30. 30.
    Paulino AC, Grupp SA (2006) Nasopharyngeal cancer; http://www.emedicine.com/ped/topic1553.htm
  31. 31.
    De Nittis AS, Machtay M, Rosenthal DI et al (2001) Advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma treated with surgery and radiotherapy, oncologic outcome and functional assessment. Am J Otolaryngol 22(5):329–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Friedlander P, Caruana S, Bhuvanesh S et al (2002) Functional status after primary surgical therapy for squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 24(2):111–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Robertson ML, Gleich LL, Barrett WL, Glukmann JK (2001) Survival, function and quality of life after external beam irradiation and brachytherapy, base-of-tongue cancer. Laryngoscope 111(8):1362–1365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T et al (2002) Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med 34:205–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kirwan J, Heiberg T, Hewlett S et al (2003) Outcomes from the patient perspective workshop at OMERACT 6. J Rheumatol 30(4):868–876PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kvale S (1996) Interviews—an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bjordal K, de Graeff A, Fayers PM, Hammerlid E et al (2000) A 12 country filed study of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the head and neck spacific module (EORTC QLQ-HN35) in head and neck patients. Euro J Cancer 36:1796–1807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    World Health Organization (2003) ICF Checklist. GenevaGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Delbeq AI, Van de Ven AH, Gustafson DH (1975) Group techniques for program planning: a guide to nominal group and delphi processes. Glencoe, ScottGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Otto RA, Dobie RA, Lawrence V (1997) Impact of laryngectomy on quality of life: perspective of the patient versus that of the health care provider. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 106(8):693–699PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mohide EA, Archibald SD, Tew M, Young JE, Haines T (1992) Postlaryngectomy quality-of-life dimensions identified by patients and health care professionals. Am J Surg 164(6):619–622PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Pasick RJ, Stewart SL, Bird JA, D Onofrio CN (2001) Quality of data in multiethical health surveys. Public Health Rep 116(Suppl 1):223–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hahn EA, HolznerB, Kemmler G, Sperner-Unterweger B, Hudgens SA, Cella D (2005) Crosscultural evaluation of health stus using item response theory: FACT_B comparison between Austrian and U.S: patients with breast cancer Eval Health Prof 28(2):233–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Allison (2001) Health-related quality of life comparisons in French and English-speaking populations. Community Dent Health 18(4):214–218Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Steiner WA, Ryser L, Huber E, Uebelhart D, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G (2002) Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Phys Ther Nov 82(11):1098–1107Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. Tschiesner
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. Cieza
    • 2
  • S. N. Rogers
    • 3
  • J. Piccirillo
    • 4
  • G. Funk
    • 5
  • G. Stucki
    • 2
  • A. Berghaus
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryLudwig Maximilians UniversityMunichGermany
  2. 2.Department for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, ICF Research Branch, Collaborating Center of the Family of International Classifications (DIMDI)Ludwig Maximilians UniversityMunichGermany
  3. 3.Regional Maxillofacial Unit, Merseyside Head and Neck Cancer CentreUniversity Hospital AintreeLiverpoolUK
  4. 4.Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA
  5. 5.Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations