Advertisement

Intranasal trigeminal sensitivity in subjects with allergic rhinitis

  • H. Doerfler
  • T. HummelEmail author
  • L. Klimek
  • G. Kobal
Rhinology

Abstract

Trigeminal nerve endings of the human nasal mucosa are activated by chemical, physical or thermal stimuli. Activation of these Adelta and C fibers can be quantified through the recording of chemo-somatosensory event-related potentials (ERP). The aim of this study was to investigate whether allergy-related activation of trigeminal nerve endings leads to changes in their responsiveness to intranasal trigeminal stimulation. Gaseous carbon dioxide (CO2) stimuli were applied in three sessions (baseline, after NaCl solution and after allergen application) to the nasal mucosa of 13 subjects with allergic rhinitis. Chemo-somatosensory ERP were recorded, and subjects rated the intensity of rhinitis symptoms. Administration of allergen produced a significant shortening of chemo-somatosensory ERP peak latencies P1 and N1. Observed changes of latencies were in line with rhinitis symptoms subjects indicated during the session. In addition, there was a negative relation between the general symptom score and ERP peak latencies, obtained both at baseline and after allergen exposure. In conclusion, it is hypothesized that in patients suffering from allergic rhinitis, nasal itching and sneezing after allergen exposure are, at least in part, clinical correlates of the activation of trigeminal nerve endings due to local inflammatory mechanisms. The correlations between ERP latencies and the patients’ symptoms indicate that ERP latencies may possess a predictive value of the subjects’ responsiveness to allergens.

Keywords

Allergic rhinitis Chemosomatosensory event-related potential Nasal provocation Nociceptor Trigeminal nerve 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was (partly) supported by a grant from Philip Morris USA Inc. to TH.

References

  1. 1.
    Arendt-Nielsen L, Petersen-Felix S, Fischer M, Bak P, Bjerring P, Zbinden AM (1995) The effect of N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist (ketamine) on single and repeated nociceptive stimuli: a placebo-controlled experimental human study. Anesth Analg 81:63–68Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barnes PJ (1992) Modulation of neurotransmission in airways. Physiol Rev 72:699–729PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duggan AW, Hope PJ, Jarrot B, Schaible HG, Fleetwood W (1990) Release, spread and persistence of immunoreactive neurokinin A in the dorsal horn of the cat following noxious cutaneous stimulation. Studies with antibody microprobes. Neuroscience 35:195–202PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fang SY, Shen CL (1998) Neuropeptide innervation and neuroendocrine cells in allergic rhinitis and chronic hypertrophic rhinitis. Clin Exp Allergy 28:228–232PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gamse R, Saria A (1985) Potentiation of tachykinin-induced plasma protein extravasation by calcitonin gene-related peptide. Eur J Pharmacol 114:61–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Handwerker H, Kobal G (1993) Psychophysiology of experimentally induced pain. Physiol Rev 73:639–671PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hummel T (2000) Assessment of intranasal trigeminal function. Int J Psychophysiol 36:147–155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hummel T, Roscher S, Jaumann MP, Kobal G (1996) Intranasal chemoreception in patients with Multiple Chemical Sensitivities: a double-blind investigation. Reg Tox Pharmacol 24:S79–S86Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hummel T, Roscher S, Pauli E, Frank M, Liefhold J, Fleischer W, Kobal G (1996) Asessment of analgesia in man: tramadol controlled release formula vs tramadol standard formulation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 51:31–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hummel T, Cramer O, Mohammadian P, Geisslinger G, Pauli E, Kobal G (1997) Comparison of the antinociception produced by two oral formulations of ibuprofen: ibuprofen effervescent vs. ibuprofen tablets. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 52:107–114PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hummel T, Kobal G (1998) Chemo-somatosensory (intranasal trigeminal) event-related potentials change in relation to repetitive painful chemical stimulations of the nasal mucosa: effects of the interstimulus interval. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol (in press)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kjaergaard SK, Molhave L, Pedersen OF (1991) Human reactions to a mixture of indoor air volatile organic compounds. Atmos Environ 25A:1417Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kobal G (1981) Elektrophysiologische Untersuchungen des menschlichen Geruchssinns. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kobal G (1985) Pain-related electrical potentials of the human nasal mucosa elicited by chemical stimulation. Pain 22:151–163PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kobal G, Hummel T (1989) Brain responses to chemical stimulation of the trigeminal nerve in man. In: Green BG, Mason JR, Kare MR (eds) Chemical senses, vol 2. Irritation. Marcel-Dekker, New York, pp 123–139Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kobal G, Hummel C, Nürnberg B, Brune K (1990) Effects of pentazocine and acetylsalicylic acid on pain-rating, pain-related evoked potentials and vigilance in relationship to pharmacokinetic parameters. Agents Actions 29:342–359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kobal G, Hummel T (1991) Schmerzmessung nach Reizung der Nasenschleimhaut mit Kohlendioxid. Eur J Pain 12:31–38Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kobal G, Hummel C, Gruber M, Geisslinger G, Hummel T (1994) Dose-related effects of ibuprofen on pain-related potentials. Br J Clin Pharmacol 37:445–452Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lötsch J, Kobal G, Stockmann A, Brune K, Geisslinger G (1997) Lack of analgesic activity of morphine-6-glucuronide after short-term intravenous administration in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology 87:1348–1358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mosimann BL, White MV, Hohmann RJ, Goldrich MS, Kaulbach HC, Kaliner MA (1993) Substance P, calcitonine gene-related peptide and vasoactive intestinal peptide increase in nasal secretion after allergen challenge in atopic patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol 92:95–104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shusterman DJ, Murphy MA, Balmes JR (1998) Subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis and nonrhinitic subjects react differentially to nasal irritation with chlorine gas. J Allergy Clin Immunol 101:732–738PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shusterman D, Murphy MA, Balmes J (2003) Differences in nasal irritant sensitivity by age, gender, and allergic rhinitis status. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 76:577–583Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shusterman D, Murphy MA, Balmes J (2003) Influence of age, gender, and allergy status on nasal reactivity to inhaled chlorine. Inhal Toxicol 15:1179–1189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Strupper A, Ochs G (1992) Schmerz und Schmerzsyndrome. In: Kunze K (eds) Lehrbuch der Neurologie. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 777–799Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wall PD, Woolf CJ (1984) Muscle but not cutaneous C-afferent input produces prolonged increases in the excitability of the flexion reflex in the rat. J Physiol 356:443–458PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Widdicombe JG (1990) Nasal pathophysiology. Resp Med 84 [Suppl A]:3–10Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wilhelmsson B, Holmstrom M (1992) Possible mechanisms of formaldehyde-induced discomfort in the upper airway. Scand J Work Environ Health 18:403PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Woskie SR, Eisen EE, Wegman DH, Hu X, Kriebel D (1998) Worker sensitivity and reactivity: Indicators of worker susceptibility to nasal irritation. Am J Ind Med 34:614–622PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GastroenterologyUniversity of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical SchoolErlangenGermany
  2. 2.Smell and Taste Clinic, Department of OtorhinolaryngologyUniversity of Dresden Medical SchoolDresdenGermany
  3. 3.Department of OtorhinolaryngologyDeutsche Klinik für DiagnostikWiesbadenGermany
  4. 4.Department of Pharmacology and ToxicoclogyUniversity of Erlangen-NürnbergErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations