Effectiveness of a TEOAE-based screening program. Can a patient-tracking system effectively be organized using modern information technology and central data management?

  • W. Delb
  • D. Merkel
  • K. Pilorget
  • J. Schmitt
  • P. K. Plinkert


It has been shown that detecting and treating children with hearing loss at an early age will improve their speech and language development. The implementation of universal hearing screening programs is therefore one of the major goals in pediatric audiology. One problem of present screening programs is high lost to follow-up rates. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the effectiveness of a patient tracking system based on central data management and data transmission via the internet. The screening program was organized as a TEOAE (transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions)-based three-stage procedure and covered a complete German federal state (Saarland). The measurements of the first stage took place in well-baby nurseries (WBNs) as well as neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Measurements of the second stage were performed by pediatricians and ENT physicians on an outpatient basis. The third stage comprised diagnostic ABR (auditory brainstem response) measurements performed by pediatric audiologists. Using a central data management system we were able to identify and follow every child not screened or with negative results. The overall coverage in the first stage was 93% of all newborns. A screening result of the second stage could be obtained for 90% of the children. Four out of 3,830 children screened turned out to have a relevant hearing loss and were fitted with hearing aids. A TEOAE-based newborn hearing screening system can be organized effectively. Central data management as well as interdisciplinary organization of the follow-up are important prerequisites for the success of a hearing screening program. A follow-up system as proposed in this paper can also be implemented in AABR (automated auditory brainstem response)-based programs.


Otoacoustic emissions Hearing loss Patient tracking Telemedicine 



This study was supported by the Ministerium für Frauen, Gesundheit, Arbeit und Soziales des Saarlandes, the Ministerium für Bildung, Kultur und Wissenschaft des Saarlandes, Kind Hörgeräte (Großburgwedel, Germany), the Lions Club of Lebach, Germany and CiK (Lebach). The authors wish to thank Dr. W. Wahlen, Homburg/Saar, Germany and Dr. W. Hornberger, Sulzbach, Germany for their assistance in organizing the program. Also the authors wish to thank all ENT-physicians and pediatricians who contributed to the program.


  1. 1.
    Aidan D, Avan P, Bonfils P (1999) Auditory screening in neonates by means of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: a report of 2,842 recordings. Ann Otol Laryngol 108:525–531Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Academy of Pediatrics (1999) Newborn and infant hearing loss: detection and intervention. Pediatrics 103:527–530PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barsky-Firkser L, Sun S (1997) Universal newborn hearing screening: a 3-year experience. Pediatrics 99:1–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cox LC, Toro MR (2001) Evolution of a universal infant screening program in an inner city hospital. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 59:99–104CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Downs MP, Yoshinaga-Itano C (1999) The efficacy of early identification for children with hearing impairment. Pediatr Clin North Am 46:79–87PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Finitzo T, Crumley WG (1999) The role of the pediatrician in hearing loss. Pediatr Clin North Am 46:15–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grandori F, Lutman M (1999) The European consensus statement on neonatal hearing screening (Milan, May 15–16, 1998). Am J Audiol 8:19–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hayes K (1999) State programs for universal newborn hearing screening. Pediatr Clin North Am 46:89–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Horn K, McDaniel SL, Olguin M (1997) Universal newborn hearing screening. Am J Otol 18:539PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johansson B, Wedenberg E, Westin B (1964) Measurement of tone response by the human fetus. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 57:188–193Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Joint committee on infant hearing (USA) (1994) Joint committee on infant hearing position statement. ASHA 36:38–41Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Joint committee on infant hearing (USA) (2000) Joint committee on infant hearing position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Am J Audiol 9:9–29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kanne T, Schaefer L, Perkins JA (1999) Potential pitfalls of initiating a newborn hearing screening program. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125:28–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Löhle E, Holm M, Lehnhardt E (1999) Preconditions of language development in deaf children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 47:171–175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mason JA, Herrmann KR (1998) Universal infant hearing screening by automated auditory brainstem response measurement. Pediatrics 101:221–228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McPherson B, Kei J, Smyth V, Loscher (1998) Feasibility of community-based hearing screening using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Public Health 112:147–152PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Messner AH, Price M, Kwast K, Gallagher K, Forte J (2001) Volunteer-based universal newborn hearing screening program. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 60:123–130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Parving A (1999) The need for universal neonatal hearing screening: some aspects of epidemiology and identification. Acta Pediatr [Suppl] 432:69–72Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Plinkert PK, Delb W (2001) EDV-gestützter Aufbau eines interdisziplinären landesweiten Hörscreenings im Saarland. HNO 49:888–894CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reuter G, Bördgen F, Dressler F, Schäfer S, Hemmanouil I, Schönweiler R, Lenarz T (1998) Neugeborenenhörscreening mit dem automatisierten Messgerät Echosensor für Otoakustische Emissionen. HNO 46:932–941CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sininger YS, Doyle KJ, Moore JK (2001) The case for early identification of hearing loss in children Pediatr Clin North Am 46:1–14Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Starr A, Amlie RN, Martin WH (1977) Development of auditory function in newborn infants revealed by auditory brain stem potentials. Pediatrics 60:831PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    van Straaten HLM (1999) Automated auditory brainstem response in neonatal hearing screening. Acta Pediatr [Suppl] 432:76–79Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wessex Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening Trial Group (1998) Controlled trial of universal neonatal screening for early identification of permanent childhood hearing impairment. Lancet 352:1957–1964CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yoshinaga-Itano C (1995) Efficacy of early identification and intervention. Semin Hear 16:115–123Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yoshinaga-Itano C, Apuzzo MR (1998) The development of deaf and hard of hearing children identified early through the high risk registry. Am Ann Deaf 143:416–424PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yoshinaga-Itano C, Gravel JS (2001) The evidence for universal newborn hearing screening. Am J Audiol 10:62–64PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Delb
    • 1
  • D. Merkel
    • 1
  • K. Pilorget
    • 1
  • J. Schmitt
    • 2
  • P. K. Plinkert
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of Saarland Homburg/SaarGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Medical Biometrics, Epidemiology and Medical InformaticsUniversity of SaarlandHomburg/SaarGermany

Personalised recommendations