Altered patient perceptions and preferences regarding male and female gynecologists: a comparison between 1997 and 2018
- 38 Downloads
The purpose of this investigation was to explore changes in patient preference regarding gynecologist’s gender.
Using a standardized questionnaire, distributed in 1997 and 2018, a total of 1000 women were interviewed about preferences in terms of their choice of gynecologist and perceptions regarding gender-dependency of gynecologist’s qualifications, strengths and weaknesses. Data was correlated with sociodemographics and possible influencing factors.
Based on their own experience, an increasing majority did not express a preference for their gynecologist’s gender (58–71%). However, the minority that still favors one gender demonstrated a significant decrease in preference of male gynecologists (14–5%), while about a quarter still generally prefer treatment by female physicians. Sub-analyses of emotional and technical treatment aspects generally confirm these trends in that more of today’s patients are indifferent to their gynecologist’s sex and that the remaining minority shifts towards favoring female doctors. If asked to definitely choose between female and male physicians based solely on the aspect of trust a significant change can be noted (69–30%) in favor of female doctors in 2018 as opposed to 1997 when patients were split in this regard (52%/48%). Overall bad personal experience regarding gynecological treatment has significantly decreased (36% reduction).
Over the last decades, patient preference and perception of the importance of their gynecologist’s gender has changed. While an increasing majority attributes equal competence in emotional, professional and interpersonal aspects to both genders, the remaining proportion of patients demonstrates a significant shift towards favoring female doctors.
KeywordsPatient preference Gender Gynecologist Physician
German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe
University Hospital Würzburg
University Medical Centre Mannheim
SS: project development, data collection, data management, data analysis, provision of study patients, Manuscript writing, final approval of manuscript. CW: data analysis, final approval of manuscript. MS: data collection, project development, data analysis, administrative support, provision of study patients, final approval of manuscript, supervision.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
The ethical approval for this study was obtained through Ethics Committee II, Heidelberg University, Medical Faculty Mannheim (2018-572N-MA).
- 1.Lukesch B (2015) Frauenärzte—Plötzlich ein Exot. DIE ZEIT vol Nr. 3/2015, 15.01.2015 edn. https://www.zeit.de/2015/03/gynaekologie-schweiz-frauen-aerzte/komplettansicht
- 2.Bundesärztekammer (2017) Census of medical professionals in Germany 2017. https://www.bundesaerztekammer.de/ueber-uns/aerztestatistik/aerztestatistik-2017/. Accessed 6 Sep 2019
- 7.Preston-Whyte ME, Fraser RC, Beckett JL (1983) Effect of a principal's gender on consultation patterns. J R Coll General Pract 33(255):654–658Google Scholar
- 8.Kelly JM (1980) Sex preference in patient selection of a family physician. J Family Pract 11(3):427–433Google Scholar
- 10.Heaton CJ, Marquez JT (1990) Patient preferences for physician gender in the male genital/rectal exam. Family Pract Res J 10(2):105–115Google Scholar
- 16.Lund JD, Rohrer JE, Goldfarb S (2005) Patient gender preferences in a large military teaching hospital. Obstet Gynecol 105(4):747–750. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000156297.25395.e4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Fisher WA, Bryan A, Dervaitis KL, Silcox J, Kohn H (2002) It ain't necessarily so: most women do not strongly prefer female obstetrician-gynaecologists. J Obstetr Gynaecol Canada 24(11):885–888Google Scholar
- 26.Fennema K, Meyer DL, Owen N (1990) Sex of physician: patients' preferences and stereotypes. J Family Pract 30(4):441–446Google Scholar