The impact of sperm DNA fragmentation on ICSI outcome in cases of donated oocytes
- 79 Downloads
The aim of this study is to evaluate the sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) in oocyte donation cycles and correlate it with the sperm parameters, the male characteristics, the embryo quality and the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
A total of 150 couples participating in an oocyte donation program were included in the study. Sperm samples were assessed by conventional sperm analysis. DFI was evaluated using the Halosperm kit, a sperm chromatin dispersion test (SCD).
The relations between DNA damage and epidemiological male factors (age, height, weight), standard semen parameters (concentration, total and forward motility, and morphology), and embryological and clinical parameters (fertilization rate, total blastocyst number, number of good quality blastocyst, clinical pregnancy) were analyzed. DFI was positively correlated with advanced male age (r = 0.23, p < 0.05) and negatively correlated with total sperm and forward motility (r = − 0.29, r = − 0.27, respectively; p < 0.05). DFI was not significantly correlated with pregnancy outcome in oocyte donation cycles (r = − 0.05, p > 0.05). When good quality blastocysts were chosen, a trend toward the development of good quality embryos was detected in the presence of a low DFI (r = − 0.20, p = 0.08).
DFI does not significantly affect the outcome of ICSI in oocyte donation cycles. Even in cases of advanced paternal age that a high DFI resulted sperm DNA fragmentation seems not to adversely affect the final outcome.
KeywordsDNA fragmentation SCD test Infertility ICSI Oocyte donation
Preliminary data regarding this study were presented as poster at the 10th European Congress of Andrology, October 2018 in Budapest, Hungary.
SA: Data collection or management, data analysis, manuscript writing. AP: Protocol/project development, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing. YPa: Protocol/project development, data analysis. SP: Data management, data analysis. NP: Data management, data analysis, manuscript editing. SAN: Data analysis, manuscript editing. MGP: Data collection or management. GM: Data analysis, manuscript editing. YPr: Protocol/project development, data management, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing.
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Institutional Review Board of Iakentro Advanced Medical Center/ethics committee of Thessaloniki, Greece approved the study at 2/9/2013, Ref. Number 9/2013.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 6.Taherzadeh S, Khalili MA, Agha-Rahimi A, Anbari F, Ghazali S, Macchiarelli G (2017) Vitrification increased vacuolization of human spermatozoa: application of MSOME technology. J Reprod Infertil 18:225–230Google Scholar
- 7.Nottola SA, Albani E, Coticchio G, Palmerini MG, Lorenzo C, Scaravelli G, Borini A, Levi-Setti PE, Macchiarelli G (2016) Freeze/thaw stress induces organelle remodeling and membrane recycling in cryopreserved human mature oocytes. J Assist Reprod Genet 33:1559–1570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0798-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Fernández JL, Muriel L, Goyanes V, Segrelles E, Gosálvez J, Enciso M, LaFromboise M, De Jonge C (2005) Simple determination of human sperm DNA fragmentation with an improved sperm chromatin dispersion test. Fertil Steril 84:833–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.11.089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Ribas-Maynou J, García-Peiró A, Fernández-Encinas A, Abad C, Amengual MJ, Prada E, Navarro J, Benet J (2013) Comprehensive analysis of sperm DNA fragmentation by five different assays: TUNEL assay, SCSA, SCD test and alkaline and neutral Comet assay. Andrology 1:715–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2047-2927.2013.00111.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Fernández JL, Muriel L, Rivero MT, Goyanes V, Vazquez R, Alvarez JG (2003) The sperm chromatin dispersion test: a simple method for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation. J Androl 24:59–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2003.tb02641.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Cissen M, Wely MV, Scholten I, Mansell S, Bruin JP, Mol BW, Braat D, Repping S, Hamer G (2016) Measuring sperm DNA fragmentation and clinical outcomes of medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 11:e0165125. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Prapas N, Tavaniotou A, Panagiotidis Y, Prapa S, Kasapi E, Goudakou M, Papatheodorou A, Prapas Y (2009) GnRH antagonists and endometrial receptivity in oocyte recipients: a prospective randomized trial. Reprod Biomed Online 18:276-281. https://www.rbmonline.com/Article/3602
- 27.Petousis S, Prapas Y, Papatheodorou A, Margioula-Siarkou C, Papatzikas G, Panagiotidis Y, Karkanaki A, Ravanos K, Prapas N (2018) Fluorescence in situ hybridisation sperm examination is significantly impaired in all categories of male infertility. Andrologia 50:e12847. https://doi.org/10.1111/and.12847 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Chavarro JE, Toth TL, Wright DL, Meeker JD, Hauser R (2010) Body mass index in relation to semen quality, sperm DNA integrity, and serum reproductive hormone levels among men attending an infertility clinic. Fertil Steril 93:2222–2231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Tandara M, Bajic A, Tandara L, Sunj M, Jurisic Z, Jukic M (2013) Correlation between proportions of sperm with DNA fragmentation assessed by Halosperm test and values of standard quality parameters of semen and possible impact on embryo quality. Zdrav Vestn 82:298–307Google Scholar
- 38.Irvine DS, Twigg JP, Gordon EL, Fulton N, Milne PA, Aitken R (2000) DNA integrity in human spermatozoa: relationships with semen quality. J Androl 21:33–44Google Scholar
- 39.Sheikh N, Amiri I, Farimani M, Najafi R, Hadeie J (2008) Correlation between sperm parameters and sperm DNA fragmentation in fertile and infertile men. Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd) 6:13–18Google Scholar
- 42.Rafighdoost H, Farsi MM, Javadi M, Khafri S (2013) Relationship between sperm parameters and DNA fragmentation using a halosperm kit. Anat Sci J 10:79–86Google Scholar
- 45.Yılmaz S, Zergeroğlu AD, Yılmaz E, Sofuoglu K, Delikara N, Kutlu P (2010) Effects of sperm DNA fragmentation on semen parameters and ICSI outcome determined by an improved SCD test, Halosperm. Int J Fertil Steril 4:73–78Google Scholar
- 46.Larson-Cook KL, Brannian JD, Hansen KA, Kasperson KM, Aamold ET, Evenson DP (2003) Relationship between the outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques and sperm DNA fragmentation as measured by the sperm chromatin structure assay. Fertil Steril 80:895–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(03)01116-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 48.Høst E, Lindenberg S, Smidt-Jensen S (2000) The role of DNA strand breaks in human spermatozoa used for IVF and ICSI. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79:559–563. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0412.2000.079007559.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 49.Muriel L, Garrido N, Fernández JL, Remohí J, Pellicer A, de los Santos MJ, Meseguer M (2006) Value of the sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation level, as measured by the sperm chromatin dispersion test, in the outcome of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 85:371–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.07.1327 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 50.Zhylkova I, Feskov O, Feskova I, Fedota O, Feskov V (2014) Sperm DNA fragmentation as a factor of male low reproductive function in IVF practice. Int J Biol 6:75–81Google Scholar
- 61.Muratori M, Tarozzi N, Cambi M, Boni L, Iorio AL, Passaro C, Luppino B, Nadalini M, Marchiani S, Tamburrino L, Forti G, Maggi M, Baldi E, Borini A (2016) Variation of DNA fragmentation levels during density gradient sperm selection for assisted reproduction techniques: a possible new male predictive parameter of pregnancy? Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e3624. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003624 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 65.Lin MH, Kuo-Kuang Lee R, Li SH, Lu CH, Sun FJ, Hwu YM (2008) Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters are not related to fertilization rates, embryo quality, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, but might be related to spontaneous abortion rates. Fertil Steril 90:352–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar