Advertisement

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 299, Issue 5, pp 1243–1252 | Cite as

What uro-gynecologists should know about sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for the treatment of refractory overactive bladder

  • Matthias OelkeEmail author
  • Mustapha Addali
  • Christl Reisenauer
Review
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To inform uro-gynecologists about the current standards and latest developments of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) in women with overactive bladder (OAB).

Methods

Literature search in the PubMed database for articles published between 1988 and 2019 on SNM for OAB in women.

Results

In total, 361 articles were identified and 51 articles retrieved for the review. SNM shows an objective success rate of 70–80%, OAB cure rate of 17–47% and a subjective satisfaction rate of 80–90%. These benefits have to be weighed against an adverse event rate of approx. 40%. SNM is significantly more successful than switching to another antimuscarinic after failed antimuscarinic drug therapy. Efficacy of SNM is slightly lower compared to bladder wall injections with 200 U botulinum toxin in the first months but efficacy of both treatments appears to be similar after 24 months. MRI examinations of patients with a sacral neurostimulator should only be performed after radiologist consultation. Sacral neurostimulators in patients with another pacemaker system should only be implanted after interdisciplinary consultation. The sacral neuromodulator should be turned off during pregnancy and delivery. SNM for OAB in patients with concomitant female sexual dysfunction or fecal incontinence seems to be beneficial.

Conclusions

SNM is a successful and recommended second-line treatment of OAB. Sacral neurostimulators should preferably be implanted in SNM-centers because complications and the frequency of revisions are significantly reduced with increasing experience of the surgeon.

Keywords

Overactive bladder Urge incontinence Implantable neurostimulators Treatment efficacy Postoperative complications 

Notes

Author contributions

MO: Protocol and project development; data collection and management; data analysis; manuscript writing and editing. MA: Data analysis; manuscript writing and editing. CR: Data collection and management; data analysis; manuscript writing and editing.

Funding

None.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

M Oelke has received for OAB a speaker honorarium from Astellas, Duchesnay, Pierre Fabre and Pfizer, is advisory board member of Astellas and Pfizer, received research grants from Astellas and Pfizer, and participated in clinical trials from Apogepha, Astellas and Pfizer. M Addali has no conflict of interest. C Reisenauer has received a speaker honorarium from Astellas, Boston Scientific, Coloplast and Medtronic.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Haylen B, de Ridder D, Freeman RM et al (2010) An International urogynecological association (IUGA)/international continence society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 29:4–20Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D’Ancona C, Haylen B, Oelke M et al (2019) The International Continence Society (ICS) report on the terminology for adult male lower urinary tract and pelvic floor symptoms and dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 38(2):433–477.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23897 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coyne KS, Sexton CC, Thompson CL et al (2009) The prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in the USA, the UK and Sweden: results from the epidemiology of LUTS (EpiLUTS) study. BJU Int 104:352–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Irwin DE, Milsom I, Chancellor MB, Kopp Z, Guan Z (2010) Dynamic progression of overactive bladder and urinary incontinence symptoms: a systematic review. Eur Urol 58:532–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brown JS, McGhan WF, Chokroverty S (2000) Comorbidities associated with overactive bladder. Am J Manag Care 6(11 Suppl):574–579Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gormley EA, Lightner DJ, Burgio KL et al (2012) Diagnosis and treatment of overactive bladder (non-neurogenic) in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol 188(6 Suppl):2455–2463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nambiar AK, Bosch R, Cruz F et al (2018) EAU Guidelines on assessment and nonsurgical management of urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 73:596–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wolz-Beck M, Reisenauer C, Kolenic GE et al (2017) Physiotherapy and behavior therapy for the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome: a prospective cohort study. Ach Gynecol Obstet 295:1211–1217Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Operation room manual Interstim therapy. http://manuals.medtronic.com/content/dam/emanuals/neuro/MA13887A033A_view.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2019
  10. 10.
    Gajewski JB, Schurch B, Hamid R et al (2018) An international continence society (ICS) report on the terminology for adult neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (ANLUTD). Neurourol Urodyn 37:1152–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schmidt RA, Senn E, Tanagho EA (1990) Functional evaluation of sacral nerve root integrity. Report of a technique. Urology 35:388–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jones J, Van de Putte D, De Ridder D et al (2016) A joint mechanism of action for sacral Neuromodulation for bladder and bowel dysfunction? Urology 97:13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Malde S, Fry C, Schurch B et al (2018) What is the exact working mechanism of botulinum toxin A and sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of overactive bladder/detrusor overactivity? ICI–RS 2017. Neurourol Urodyn 37:S108–S116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moon KH, Han JY, Kim JH et al (2014) Prospective trial of sacral neuromodulation for refractory overactive bladder syndrome in Korean patients. Low Urin Tract Symptoms 6:175–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Amend B, Khalil M, Kessler TM, Sievert KD (2011) How does sacral modulation work best? Placement and programming techniques to maximize efficacy. Curr Urol Rep 12:327–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Matzel KE, Chartier-Kastler E, Knowles CH et al (2017) Sacral neuromodulation: standardized electrode placement technique. Neuromodulation 20:816–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Occhino JA, Siegel SW (2010) Sacral nerve modulation in overactive bladder. Curr Urol Rep 11:348–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jairam R, Drossaerts J, Marcelissen T, van Koeveringe G, van Kerrebroeck P (2018) Onset of action of sacral neuromodulation in lower urinary tract dysfunction—What is the optimal duration of test stimulation? J Urol 199:1584–1590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ghazwani YQ, Elkelini MS, Hassouna M (2011) Association between stimulation parameters and loss of efficacy of selective sacral nerve root stimulation. Neuromodulation 14:266–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vaganée D, Kessler TM, Van de Borne S, De Win G, De Wachter S (2019) Sacral neuromodulation using the standardized tined lead implantation technique with a curved vs a straight stylet: 2-year clinical outcomes and sensory responses to lead stimulation. BJU Int.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14650
  21. 21.
    Pizarro-Berdichevsky J, Gill BC, Clifton M et al (2018) Motor response matters: optimizing lead placement improves sacral neuromodulation outcomes. J Urol 199:1032–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Siegel S, Noblett K, Mangel J et al (2018) Five-year follow-up results of a prospective, multicenter study of patients with overactive bladder treated with sacral neuromodulation. J Urol 199:229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Amundsen CL, Richter HE, Menefee SA et al (2016) OnabotulinumtoxinA vs sacral neuromodulation on refractory urgency urinary incontinence in women: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 316:1366–1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Powell CR (2018) Troubleshooting Interstim sacral neuromodulation generators to recover function. Curr Urol Rep 19:86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Siegel S, Noblett K, Mangel J et al (2015) Results of a prospective, randomized, multicentre study evaluating sacral neuromodulation with InterStim therapy compared to standard medical therapy at 6-months in subjects with mild symptoms of overactive bladder. Neurourol Urodyn 34:224–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Al-zahrani AA, Elzayat EA, Gajewski JB (2011) Long-term outcome and surgical interventions after sacral neuromodulation implant for lower urinary tract symptoms: 14-year experience at 1 center. J Urol 185:981–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Widmann B, Galata C, Warschkow R et al (2019) Success and complication rates after sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence and constipation: a single-center follow-up study. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 25:159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Blok B, van Kerrebroeck P, de Wachter S et al (2019) A prospective, multicenter study of a novel, miniaturized rechargeable sacral neuromodulation system: 12-month results from the RELAX-OAB study. Neurourol Urodyn 38(2):689–695.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23892 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brazzelli M, Murray A, Fraser C (2006) Efficacy and safety of sacral nerve stimulation for urinary urge incontinence: a systematic review. J Urol 175(3 Pt 1):835–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Herbison GP, Arnold EP (2009) Sacral neuromodulation with implanted devices for urinary storage and voiding dysfunction in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD004202Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, Amundsen CL (2010) Efficacy and adverse events of sacral nerve stimulation for overactive bladder: a systematic review. Neurourol Urodyn 29(Suppl 1):S18–S23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schmidt RA, Jonas U, Oleson KA et al (1999) Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of refractory urinary urge incontinence. Sacral Nerve stimulation study group. J Urol 162:352–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Weil EH, Ruiz-Cerda JL, Eerdmans PH, Janknegt RA (2000) Sacral root neuromodulation in the treatment of refractory urinary urge incontinence: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Eur Urol 37:161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hassouna MM, Siegel SW, Nyeholt AA et al (2000) Sacral neuromodulation in the treatment of urgency-frequency symptoms: a multicenter study on efficacy and safety. J Urol 163:1849–1854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Everaert K, Kerckhaert W, Caluwaerts H et al (2004) A prospective randomized trial comparing the 1-stage with the 2-stage implantation of a pulse generator in patients with pelvic floor dysfunction selected for sacral nerve stimulation. Eur Urol 45:649–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Amundsen CL, Komesu YM, Chermansky C et al (2018) Two-year outcomes of sacral neuromodulation versus onabotulinumtoxinA for refractory urgency incontinence: a randomized trial. Eur Urol 74:66–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Peeters K, Sahai A, De Ridder D, van der Aa F (2014) Long-term follow-up of sacral neuromodulation for lower urinary tract dysfunction. BJU Int 113:789–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Riemsma R, Hagen S, Kirschner-Hermanns R et al (2017) Can incontinence be cured? A systematic review of cure rates. BMC Med 15:63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kavvadias T, Huebner M, Brucker SY, Reisenauer C (2017) Management of device-related complications after sacral neuromodulation for lower urinary tract disorders in women: a single center experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295:951–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Groen J, Blok BF, Bosch JL (2011) Sacral neuromodulation as treatment for refractory idiopathic urge urinary incontinence: 5-year results of a longitudinal study in 60 women. J Urol 186:954–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    van Voskuilen C, Oerlemans DJ, Weil EH, de Bie RA, van Kerrebroeck PE (2006) Long term results of neuromodulation by sacral nerve stimulation for lower urinary tract symptoms: a retrospective single center study. Eur Urol 49:366–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chermansky CJ, Krlin RM, Holley TD, Woo HH, Winters JC (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging following interstim®: an institutional experience with imaging safety and patient satisfaction. Neurourol Urodyn 30:1486–1488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Quirouet A, Bhattacharyya PK, Dielubanza EJ, Gill BC, Jones SE, Goldman HB (2017) Sacral neuromodulation device heating during lumbar and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging-a phantom study. Urology 107:61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Guzman-Negron JM, Pizarro-Berdichevsky J, Gill BC, Goldman HB (2018) Can lumbosacral magnetic resonance imaging be performed safely in patients with a sacral neuromodulation device? An in vivo prospective study. J Urol 200:1088–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Guinand A, Noble S, Frei A et al (2016) Extra-cardiac stimulators: what do cardiologists need to know? Europace 18:1299–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Roth TM (2010) Sacral neuromodulation and cardiac pacemakers. Int Urogynecol J 21:1035–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gahzi AA, Elterman DS, Hassouna M (2016) Sacral neuromodulation in patients with a cardiac pacemaker. Int Neurourol J. 20:270–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Molon G, Perrone C, Maines M et al (2011) ICD and neuromodulation devices: is peaceful coexistence possible? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 34:690–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Jones CL, Fischer JR, Hernandez SL (2016) Sacral neuromodulation for the treatment of persistent genital arousal disorder. Obstet Gynecol 128:321–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lombardi G, Mondaini N, Macchiarella A, Cilotti A, Del Popolo G (2008) Clinical female sexual outcome after sacral neuromodulation implant for lower urinary tract symptom (LUTS). J Sex Med. 5:1411–1417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Parnell BA, Howard JF Jr, Geller EJ (2015) The effect of sacral neuromodulation on pudendal nerve function and female sexual function. Neurourol Urodyn 34:456–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Yaiesh SM, Al-Terki AE, Al-Shaiji TF (2016) Safety of sacral nerve stimulation in pregnancy: a literature review. Neuromodulation 19:770–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wiseman OJ, Hombergh UD, Koldewijn EL, Spinelli M, Siegel SW, Fowler CJ (2002) Sacral neuromodulation and pregnancy. J Urol 167:165–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Roulette P, Castel-Lacanal E, Sanson S et al (2018) Sacral neuromodulation and pregnancy: results of a national survey carried out for the neuro-urology committee of the French association of urology (AFU). Neurourol Urodyn 37:792–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Thaha MA, Abukar AA, Thin NN, Ramsanahie A, Knowles CH (2015) Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and constipation in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 24:CD004464Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Caremel R, Damon H, Ruffion A et al (2012) Can sacral neuromodulation improve minor incontinence symptoms in doubly incontinent patients successfully treated for major incontinence symptoms? Urology 79:80–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Rydningen M, Riise S, Wilsgaard T, Lindsetmo RO, Norderval S (2018) Sacral neuromodulation for combined faecal and urinary incontinence following obstetric anal sphincter injury. Colorectal Dis 20:59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Balchandra P, Rogerson L (2014) Women’s perspective: intra-detrusor botox versus sacral neuromodulation for overactive bladder symptoms after unsuccessful anticholinergic treatment. Int Urogynecol J 25:1059–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hashim H, Beusterien K, Bridges JF, Amos K, Cardozo L (2015) Patient preferences for treating refractory overactive bladder in the UK. Int Urol Nephrol 47:1619–1627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Nobrega R, Greenwell TJ, Pickard R, Ockrim JL, Harding CK (2018) Sacral nerve stimulation versus intravesical botulinum toxin injections for medically refractory overactive bladder: a contemporary review of UK treatment from both clinician and patients’ perspectives. J Clin Urol 11:339–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urologic OncologySt. Antonius HospitalGronauGermany
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Hospital TübingenTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations