Advertisement

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 299, Issue 5, pp 1337–1343 | Cite as

Laparoscopic pectopexy: a follow-up cyclic biomechanical analysis determining time to functional stability

  • A. Sauerwald
  • L. Langer
  • D. Ratiu
  • A. Prescher
  • M. Scaal
  • G. K. Noé
  • K. Wegmann
  • D. R. Bulian
  • C. EichlerEmail author
General Gynecology
  • 54 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

Pectopexy, a laparoscopic method for prolapse surgery, showed promising results in previous transient testing by this group. It was shown that a single suture, yielding an ultimate load of 35 N, was equivalent to continuous suturing. This was demonstrated in an in vitro cadaver study. This transient data were used to establish an elastic stress–strain envelope. It was now possible to proceed to dynamic in vitro analysis of this surgical method to establish time to functional stability.

Methods

Cyclic testing of this fixation method was performed on human female embalmed cadaver (cohort 1) and fresh, non-embalmed cadaver (cohort 2) pelvises. The testing envelope was 5–25 N at a speed of 1 mm/s. 100 load regulated cycles were applied.

Results

100 cycles were completed with each model; no overall system failure occurred. Steady state, i.e., functional stability was reached after 14.5 (± 2.9) cycles for the embalmed group and after 19.1 (± 7.2) cycles for the non-embalmed group. This difference was statistically significant p = 0.00025.

Conclusion

This trial showed in an in vitro cyclic testing of the pectopexy method that functional stability may be achieved after no more than 19.1 cycles of load exposure. When remaining within the established load envelope of below 25 N, patients do not need to fear global fixation failure. Testing did demonstrate differences in non-embalmed and embalmed cadaver testing. Embalmed cadaver testing tends to underestimate time to steady state by 26.3%.

Keywords

Pectopexy Laparoscopic Dynamic In vitro Analysis Cyclic testing Biomechanical Biomechanic 

Notes

Author contributions

AS: project development and manuscript writing. LL: project development, data collection, and manuscript writing. DR: manuscript writing/editing. AP: data collection. MS: data collection. GKN: project development manuscript writing/editing. KW: data collection. DRB: manuscript writing/editing. CE: project development, data collection, and manuscript writing.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Banerjee C, Noe KG (2011) Laparoscopic pectopexy: a new technique of prolapse surgery for obese patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284:631–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alkatout I, Mettler L, Peters G, Noe G, Holthaus B, Jonat W et al (2014) Laparoscopic hysterectomy and prolapse: a multiprocedural concept. JSLS 18:89–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huber SA, Northington GM, Karp DR (2014) Bowel and bladder dysfunction following surgery within the presacral space: an overview of neuroanatomy, function, and dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 26:941–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee RK, Mottrie A, Payne CK, Waltregny D (2014) A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. Eur Urol 65:1128–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maher C, Baessler K, Glazener CM, Adams EJ, Hagen S (2004) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004014Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Connolly A, Cundiff G, Weber AM et al (2004) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 104:805–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Siddiqui NY, Grimes CL, Casiano ER, Abed HT, Jeppson PC, Olivera CK et al (2015) Mesh sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 125:44–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tahaoglu AE, Bakir MS, Peker N, Bagli I, Tayyar AT (2018) Modified laparoscopic pectopexy: short-term follow-up and its effects on sexual function and quality of life. Int Urogynecol J 29:1155–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cezarino BN (2017) Editorial comment: laparoscopic pectopexy: initial experience of single center with a new technique for apical prolapse surgery. Int Braz J Urol 43:910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kale A, Biler A, Terzi H, Usta T, Kale E (2017) Laparoscopic pectopexy: initial experience of single center with a new technique for apical prolapse surgery. Int Braz J Urol 43:903–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sauerwald A, Niggl M, Puppe J, Prescher A, Scaal M, Noe GK et al (2016) Laparoscopic pectopexy: a biomechanical analysis. PLoS ONE 11:e0144143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thelen S, Schneppendahl J, Baumgartner R, Eichler C, Koebke J, Betsch M et al (2013) Cyclic long-term loading of a bilateral fixed-angle plate in comparison with tension band wiring with K-wires or cannulated screws in transverse patella fractures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:311–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hackl M, Wegmann K, Ries C, Lappen S, Scaal M, Muller LP (2017) Annular ligament reconstruction with the superficial head of the brachialis: surgical technique and biomechanical evaluation. Surg Radiol Anat 39:585–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thelen S, Betsch M, Schneppendahl J, Grassmann J, Hakimi M, Eichler C et al (2013) Fixation of multifragmentary patella fractures using a bilateral fixed-angle plate. Orthopedics 36:e1437–e1443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thelen S, Schneppendahl J, Jopen E, Eichler C, Koebke J, Schonau E et al (2012) Biomechanical cadaver testing of a fixed-angle plate in comparison to tension wiring and screw fixation in transverse patella fractures. Injury 43:1290–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wild M, Eichler C, Thelen S, Jungbluth P, Windolf J, Hakimi M (2010) Fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis of the patella—an alternative to tension wiring? Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 25:341–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wild M, Thelen S, Jungbluth P, Betsch M, Miersch D, Windolf J et al (2011) Fixed-angle plates in patella fractures - a pilot cadaver study. Eur J Med Res 16:41–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zimkowski MM, Rentschler ME, Schoen J, Rech BA, Mandava N, Shandas R (2013) Integrating a novel shape memory polymer into surgical meshes decreases placement time in laparoscopic surgery: an in vitro and acute in vivo study. J Biomed Mater Res A 101:2613–2620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zimkowski MM, Rentschler ME, Schoen JA, Mandava N, Shandas R (2014) Biocompatibility and tissue integration of a novel shape memory surgical mesh for ventral hernia: in vivo animal studies. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 102:1093–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eichler C, Schell J, Uener J, Prescher A, Scaal M, Puppe J et al (2016) Inframammary fold reconstruction: a biomechanical analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 4:e634CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsSt. Marien-HospitalDürenGermany
  2. 2.Breast Cancer CenterMunicipal Hospital HolweideCologneGermany
  3. 3.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
  4. 4.Department of AnatomyRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  5. 5.Department of AnatomyUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
  6. 6.Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsHospital Rhein-Kreis-Neuss, Faculty University of Witten/HerdeckeWittenGermany
  7. 7.Center for Orthopedic and Trauma SurgeryUniversity Medical CenterCologneGermany
  8. 8.Department of Abdominal, Vascular and Transplant Surgery Cologne-Merheim Medical Center (CMMC)Witten/Herdecke UniversityWittenGermany
  9. 9.Brustzentrum der Universitätsfrauenklinik KölnCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations