Advertisement

Oral etoposide for metastatic choriocarcinoma: a case report and review of guidelines

  • Georg-Peter BreitbachEmail author
  • Panagiotis Sklavounos
  • Christian Veith
  • Serban-Dan Costa
  • Walther Kuhn
  • Erich-Franz Solomayer
  • Ingolf Juhasz-Boess
  • Clemens Tempfer
Gynecologic Oncology
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

Background and purpose

Choriocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare form of malignant trophoblastic disease. Systemic polychemotherapy with etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, and vincristine (EMA/CO) is the mainstay of treatment for metastatic disease. Due to the rarity of the condition, however, the evidence basis for this management is small and other chemotherapy regimens may also be effective. The reported case presents anecdotal evidence of an effective etoposide monotherapy treatment.

Method: case presentation

We report the case of a patient with gestational choriocarcinoma and pulmonary metastases initially treated with methotrexate. Due to local disease progression, she underwent hysterectomy and continued treatment with methotrexate. After pulmonary progression, she was switched to oral etoposide.

Results

After four cycles of etoposide monotherapy at a oral dosage of 100 mg d1–7, q28, the patient had no evidence of disease according to human chorionic gonadotropin serum levels and imaging studies. The treatment was well tolerated with World Health Organization (WHO) grade 2 alopecia and hot flushes as the most prominent side effects. The patient has achieved a sustained complete remission with a follow-up of 6 years.

Conclusion

Oral etoposide may be an effective treatment alternative to EMA/CO in selected patients with oligometastatic CCA.

Keywords

Choriocarcinoma Etoposide Chemotherapy Angioinvasion Metastasis 

Notes

Author contributions

GPB: protocol/project development, data collection and management, data analysis, manuscript writing. PS: data collection and management. CV: images collection and management, histopathological data analysis. SDC: project development, data analysis. WK: manuscript review, editing. EFS: manuscript review, editing. IJ-B: data analysis, manuscript writing, editing. CT: data analysis, manuscript writing, editing.

Funding

This study was not funded.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All of the authors (Georg-Peter Breitbach, Panagiotis Sklavounos, Christian Veith, Serban-Dan Costa, Walther Kuhn, Erich-Franz Solomayer, Ingolf Juhasz-Boess, Clemens Tempfer) declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent for publication of this case report was received and personally signed from the patient on 2017-09-07.

References

  1. 1.
    Ngan HY, Bender H, Benedet JL, Jones H, Montruccoli GC, Pecorelli S, FIGO Committe on Gynecologic Oncology (2003) Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: FIGO 2000 staging and classification. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 83(Suppl. 1):175–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown J, Naumann RW, Seckl MJ, Schink J (2017) 15 years of progress in gestational trophoblastic disease: scoring, standardization, and salvage. Gynecol Oncol 144(1):200–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fisher RA, Newlands ES, Jeffreys AJ, Boxer GM, Begent RH, Rustin GJ et al (1992) Gestational and nongestational trophoblastic tumors distinguished by DNA analysis. Cancer 69(3):839–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dilek S, Pata O, Tok E, Polat A (2004) Extraovarian nongestational choriocarcinoma in a postmenopausal woman. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 14(5):1033–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ramarajapalli ML, Rao NA, Murudaraju P, Kilara NG (2012) Ovarian choriocarcinoma with concurrent metastases to the spleen and adrenal glands first case report. J Gynecol Surg. 28(2):153–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    FIGO Oncology Committee (2002) FIGO staging for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia 2000. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 77:285–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alifrangis C, Agarwal R, Short D, Fisher RA, Sebire NJ, Harvey R et al (2013) EMA/CO for high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia good outcomes with induction low-dose etoposide-cisplatin and genetic analysis. J Clin Oncol 31(2):280–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alazzam M, Tidy J, Osborne R, Coleman R, Hancock BW, Lawrie TA (2016) Chemotherapy for resistant or recurrent gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD008891Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Taylor F, Short D, Winter MC, Tidy J, Savage PM, Sarwar N, Hancock BW, Seckl MJ, Coleman RE (2015) A retrospective study to evaluate single agent methotrexate treatment in low risk gestational choriocarcinoma in the United Kingdom. Gynecol Oncol 136(2):258–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gupta M, Vang R, Yemelyanova AV, Kurman RJ, Li FR, Maambo EC, Murphy KM, DeScipio C, Thompson CB, Ronnett BM (2012) Diagnostic reproducibility of hydatidiform moles: ancillary techniques (p57 immunohistochemistry and molecular genotyping) improve morphologic diagnosis for both recently trained and experienced gynecologic pathologists. Am J Surg Pathol 36(12):1747–1760CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Georg-Peter Breitbach
    • 1
    Email author
  • Panagiotis Sklavounos
    • 1
  • Christian Veith
    • 2
  • Serban-Dan Costa
    • 3
  • Walther Kuhn
    • 4
  • Erich-Franz Solomayer
    • 1
  • Ingolf Juhasz-Boess
    • 1
  • Clemens Tempfer
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsSaarland UniversityHomburgGermany
  2. 2.Department of PathologySaarland UniversityHomburgGermany
  3. 3.Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsOtto-von-Guericke-UniversityMagdeburgGermany
  4. 4.Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsDonauisar Klinikum DeggendorfDeggendorfGermany
  5. 5.Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsRuhr University BochumHerneGermany

Personalised recommendations