Abstract
Purpose
To analyze the effect of combined application of intravaginal PGE2 insert and intracervical Foley balloon catheter for induction of labor.
Methods
Patients with unfavorable cervices who required induction of labor from August 2017 to December 2017 were evaluated for the study. Three hundred and ten participants were randomly assigned to study (n:155) and control group (n:155). Nine patients in study group and seven patients in control group were excluded, because they declined to participate in the study. Totally, 294 women analyzed in this prospective randomized study: Group 1 (control group): labor induction with intravaginal PgE2 vaginal insert alone (n = 148) and Group 2 (study group): intracervical Foley balloon catheter insertion adjunct to the intravaginal PgE2 insert (n = 146). The primary outcome of our study was the period from induction to delivery. The secondary outcome was the period from induction to active phase of labor.
Results
In the analysis of primiparous pregnants, combination of intracervical Foley balloon catheter and intravaginal PgE2 insertion was shown to be associated with shorter duration from induction to active stage of labor (1000 vs. 585 min, P < 0.001) and also to delivery (1386 vs. 1001 min, P < 0.001). Groups were found to be similar in terms of duration from induction to active stage of labor (670.5 vs. 535.2, P > 0.05) and also to delivery (933.1 vs. 777.9, P > 0.05, Table 2) in subgroup of women with the previous vaginal delivery.
Conclusions
Combined application of intracervical Foley balloon catheter and intravaginal PgE2 insert may result in a shorter time from labor induction to delivery without rising the risk of cesarean section in primiparous women with an unfavorable cervix.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00404-018-4998-8/MediaObjects/404_2018_4998_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00404-018-4998-8/MediaObjects/404_2018_4998_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00404-018-4998-8/MediaObjects/404_2018_4998_Fig3_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics (2009) ACOG practice bulletin no. 107: induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 114:386
Jozwiak M, Bloemenkamp KW, Kelly AJ, Mol BW, Irion O, Boulvain M (2012) Mechanical methods for induction of labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD001233
Chen W, Xue J, Peprah MK et al (2016) A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley bulbs, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labor. BJOG 123(3):346–354
Carbone JF, Tuuli MG, Fogertey PJ, Roehl KA, Macones GA (2013) Combination of Foley bulb and vaginal misoprostol compared with vaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 121:247–252
Delaney S, Shaffer BL, Cheng YW, Vargas J, Sparks TN, Paul K, Caughey AB (2010) Labor induction with a Foley balloon inflated to 30 mL compared with 60 mL: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 115(6):1239–1245
Calder AA, Loughney AD, Weir CJ, Barber JW (2008) Induction of labor in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone. BJOG 115(10):1279–1288
Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, Mercer BM, Saade GR (2012) Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol 120(5):1181–1193
Al-Ibraheemi Z, Brustman L, Bimson BE, Porat N, Rosenn B (2018) Misoprostol with Foley bulb compared with misoprostol alone for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 131(1):23–29
Ugwu EO, Onah HE, Obi SN, Dim CC, Okezie OA, Chigbu CO, Okoro OS (2013) Effect of the Foley catheter and synchronous low dose misoprostol administration on cervical ripening: a randomised controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol 33(6):572–577
Hill JB, Thigpen BD, Bofill JA, Magann E, Moore LE, Martin JN Jr (2009) A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Perinatol 26(1):33–38
Kehl S, Ehard A, Berlit S, Spaich S, Sütterlin M, Siemer J (2011) Combination of misoprostol and mechanical dilation for induction of labour: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 159(2):315–319
Rust OA, Greybush M, Atlas RO, Jones KJ, Balducci J (2001) Preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial of intravaginal misoprostol alone vs. a combination of transcervical Foley balloon and intravaginal misoprostol. J Reprod Med 46(10):899–904
Chung JH, Huang WH, Rumney PJ, Garite TJ, Nageotte MP (2003) A prospective randomized controlled trial that compared misoprostol, Foley catheter, and combination misoprostol–Foley catheter for labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:1031–1035
Levine LD, Downes KL, Elovitz MA, Parry S, Sammel MD, Srinivas SK (2016) Mechanical and pharmacologic methods of labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 128:1357–1364
Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Sciscione AC, Hoffman MK (2005) Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 105(4):698–704
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
EA: conception and design of the study and acquisition of data. OE: data analysis and manuscript writing and editing. YAC: methodology, acquisition of data, and manuscript editing. ET: data analysis and methodology. YEG: design of the study and manuscript writing. AF: data analysis and supervision. TTA: acquisition of data. EM: acquisition of data and supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eser, A., Ozkaya, E., Abide, C.Y. et al. Transcervical Foley balloon catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2 insert combination vs. vaginal prostaglandin E2 insert only for induction of labor at term: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 299, 451–457 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4998-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4998-8