Advertisement

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 299, Issue 1, pp 135–139 | Cite as

Bleeding control using intrauterine continuous running suture during cesarean section in pregnant women with placenta previa

  • Jung Min Ryu
  • Yoon Seok Choi
  • Jin Young BaeEmail author
Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • 89 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of intrauterine continuous running suture during cesarean section in pregnant women with placenta previa.

Methods

We enrolled 277 women and medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Pregnant women were grouped according to uterine bleeding control methods as follows: Group A, using intrauterine continuous running suture and Group B (control group) using figure-of-eight suture.

Results

Intrauterine continuous running sutures were used in 104 pregnant women. Mean total blood loss in Group A was significantly less than that in Group B (1332.70 ± 152.92 mL vs 1861.56 ± 157.74 mL, P = 0.029). Mean total transfusion unit of Group A was significantly less than that in Group B (1.74 ± 0.41 vs 3.52 ± 0.75, P = 0.037).

Conclusions

Intrauterine continuous running sutures can significantly reduce postpartum blood loss and transfusion units during cesarean section in pregnant women with placenta previa.

Keywords

Intrauterine continuous running suture Placenta previa Postpartum hemorrhage Transfusion 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We can obtained good data through the efforts of one of the surgeons (Seong Yeon Hong) of Table 4.

Author contributions

JMR MD conducted data collection, analysis, and manuscript writing. YSC MD, PhD conducted project development and data analysis of study. JYB MD, PhD conducted project development and manuscript writing.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Daegu Catholic University hospital Ethical approval. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    O. American College of, Gynecologists (2006) ACOG Practice Bulletin: Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists Number 76, October 2006: postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 108(4):1039–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    WHO (2012) WHO recommendations for the prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dahlke JD, Mendez-Figueroa H, Maggio L, Hauspurg AK, Sperling JD, Chauhan SP, Rouse DJ (2015) Prevention and management of postpartum hemorrhage: a comparison of 4 national guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol 213(1):76 e1–76 e10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Widmer M, Blum J, Hofmeyr GJ, Carroli G, Abdel-Aleem H, Lumbiganon P, Nguyen TN, Wojdyla D, Thinkhamrop J, Singata M, Mignini LE, Abdel-Aleem MA, Tran ST, Winikoff B (2010) Misoprostol as an adjunct to standard uterotonics for treatment of post-partum haemorrhage: a multicentre, double-blind randomised trial. Lancet 375(9728):1808–1813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shabana A, Fawzy M, Refaie W (2015) Conservative management of placenta percreta: a stepwise approach. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291(5):993–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wortman AC, Alexander JM (2013) Placenta accreta, increta, and percreta. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 40(1):137–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oyelese Y, Smulian JC (2006) Placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol 107(4):927–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Faiz AS, Ananth CV (2003) Etiology and risk factors for placenta previa: an overview and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 13(3):175–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miller DA, Chollet JA, Goodwin TM (1997) Clinical risk factors for placenta previa-placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177(1):210–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wu S, Kocherginsky M, Hibbard JU (2005) Abnormal placentation: 20-year analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192(5):1458–1461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bhal K, Bhal N, Mulik V, Shankar L (2005) The uterine compression suture–a valuable approach to control major haemorrhage at lower segment caesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol 25(1):10–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lynch CB, Coker A, Lawal AH, Abu J, Cowen MJ (1997) The B-Lynch surgical technique for the control of massive postpartum haemorrhage: an alternative to hysterectomy? Five cases reported. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104(3):372–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cho JH, Jun HS, Lee CN (2000) Hemostatic suturing technique for uterine bleeding during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 96(1):129–131Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hackethal A, Brueggmann D, Oehmke F, Tinneberg HR, Zygmunt MT, Muenstedt K (2008) Uterine compression U-sutures in primary postpartum hemorrhage after Cesarean section: fertility preservation with a simple and effective technique. Hum Reprod 23(1):74–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hayman RG, Arulkumaran S, Steer PJ (2002) Uterine compression sutures: surgical management of postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 99(3):502–506Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pereira A, Nunes F, Pedroso S, Saraiva J, Retto H, Meirinho M (2005) Compressive uterine sutures to treat postpartum bleeding secondary to uterine atony. Obstet Gynecol 106(3):569–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brecher ME, Monk T, Goodnough LT (1997) A standardized method for calculating blood loss. Transfusion 37(10):1070–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Blanc J, Courbiere B, Desbriere R, Bretelle F, Boubli L, D’Ercole C, Carcopino X (2012) Uterine-sparing surgical management of postpartum hemorrhage: is it always effective? Arch Gynecol Obstet 285(4):925–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Doumouchtsis SK, Papageorghiou AT, Arulkumaran S (2007) Systematic review of conservative management of postpartum hemorrhage: what to do when medical treatment fails. Obstet Gynecol Surv 62(8):540–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Knight M (2007) Ukoss, Peripartum hysterectomy in the UK: management and outcomes of the associated haemorrhage. BJOG 114(11):1380–1387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zwart JJ, Dijk PD, van Roosmalen J (2010) Peripartum hysterectomy and arterial embolization for major obstetric hemorrhage: a 2-year nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202(2):150 e1–150 e7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    El-Hamamy E (2005) Partial ischemic necrosis of the uterus following a uterine brace compression suture. BJOG 112(1):126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mallappa Saroja CS, Nankani A, El-Hamamy E (2010) Uterine compression sutures, an update: review of efficacy, safety and complications of B-Lynch suture and other uterine compression techniques for postpartum haemorrhage. Arch Gynecol Obstet 281(4):581–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ochoa M, Allaire AD, Stitely ML (2002) Pyometria after hemostatic square suture technique. Obstet Gynecol 99(3):506–509Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Treloar EJ, Anderson RS, Andrews HS, Bailey JL (2006) Uterine necrosis following B-Lynch suture for primary postpartum haemorrhage. BJOG 113(4):486–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wu HH, Yeh GP (2005) Uterine cavity synechiae after hemostatic square suturing technique. Obstet Gynecol 105(5 Pt 2):1176–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of MedicineCatholic University of DaeguGyeongsanSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations