Advertisement

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 298, Issue 6, pp 1115–1122 | Cite as

Rectal vs. sublingual misoprostol before cesarean section: double-blind, three-arm, randomized clinical trial

  • Mohamed S. Sweed
  • Mourad M. El-Saied
  • Amgad E. Abou-Gamrah
  • Haitham A. El-Sabaa
  • Mohamed M. Abdel-Hamid
  • Hossam Hemeda
  • Ahmed M. Mansour
  • Mohamed E. Shawky
  • Medhat A. El-Sayed
  • Radwa M. Mohamed
Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

The commonest surgical procedure for women is cesarean delivery. Postpartum hemorrhage and intra-operative blood during cesarean delivery is a major concern to all obstetricians. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy of the adjuvant use of misoprostol and oxytocin in decreasing intra-operative blood loss in cesarean delivery.

Methods

This was a double-blinded randomized clinical trial including 636 term pregnant woman scheduled for cesarean section at Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, Cairo, Egypt, between February 2013 and February 2014. Participants received either 400-μg misoprostol rectally or sublingually or placebo before cesarean section together with 5-IU oxytocin IV. The main outcome measure was intra-operative blood loss. Difference between the three groups was analyzed using one-way ANOVA test (for numeric variables) and Chi-square test (for categorical variables). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Intra-operative blood loss was higher in patients who did not receive misoprostol (Placebo Group) (295–1075 ml, 641.7 ± 135.7) than those who received it, regardless the route of administration, rectal (135–830 ml, 457.5 ± 140.7; P < 0.001), and sublingual (135–680 ml, 357.8 ± 129.7; P < 0.001). In addition, sublingual route was associated with significantly lower estimated intra-operative blood loss compared to rectal administration (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Misoprostol with oxytocin is an effective drug-combination for decreasing intra-operative blood loss during cesarian section with clinical superiority to sublingual over rectal route.

Keywords

Cesarean section Misoprostol Oxytocin Postpartum hemorrhage Rectal administration Sublingual administration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Ain-Shams University.

Author contributions

MS: protocol/project development, data analysis, and manuscript writing/editing. ME-S: protocol/project development. AA-G: protocol/project development. HE-S: data collection or management. MA-H: data collection or management. HH: data collection or management. AMM: data collection or management. MES: data collection or management. MAE-S: data collection or management. RMM: data collection or management.

Funding

This study did not receive any funds from any organization.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interests.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Approval was obtained from the ethical committee of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ain-Shams University (Approval Number: 3458).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM (2011) Trends in cesarean delivery at preterm gestation and association with perinatal mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204:505–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Getahun D, Strickland D, Lawrence JM, Fassett MJ, Koebnick C, Jacobsen SJ (2009) Racial and ethnic disparities in the trends in primary cesarean delivery based on indications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201:422–427PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Khawaja M, Choueiry N, Jurdi R (2009) Hospital-based caesarean section in the Arab region: an overview. East Mediterr Health J 15:458–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    ACOG Practice Bulletin (2006) Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists number 76, October 2006: postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 108:1039–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Langenbach C (2006) Misoprostol in preventing postpartum hemorrhage: a meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Obstet 92:10–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Munn MB, Owen J, Vincent R, Wakefield M, Chestnut DH, Hauth JC (2001) Comparison of two oxytocin regimens to prevent uterine atony at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 98:386–390PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    World Health Organization (2012) WHO recommendations for the prevention and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gulmezoglu AM, Forna F, Villar J, Hofmeyr GJ (2007) Prostaglandins for preventing postpartum haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8(3):494Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Conde-Agudelo A, Nieto A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Romero R (2013) Misoprostol to reduce intraoperative and postoperative hemorrhage during cesarean delivery: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 209:40PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Soltan MH, El-Gendi E, Imam HH, Fathi O (2007) Different doses of sublingual misoprostol versus methylergometrine for the prevention of atonic postpartum haemorrhage. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 1:229–236PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hofmeyr GJ, Gulmezoglu AM, Novikova N, Linder V, Ferreira S, Piaggio G (2009) Misoprostol to prevent and treat postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of maternal deaths and dose-related effects. Bull World Health Organ 87:666–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tang OS, Schweer H, Seyberth HW, Lee SW, Ho PC (2002) Pharmacokinetics of different routes of administration of misoprostol. Hum Reprod 17:332–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    El Tahan MR, Warda OM, Rashad A, Yasseen AM, Ramzy EA, Ahmady MS, Diab DG, Matter MK (2012) Effects of preoperative sublingual misoprostol on uterine tone during isoflurane anesthesia for cesarean section. Rev Bras Anestesiol 62:625–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ragab A, Barakat R, Alsammani MA (2016) A randomized clinical trial of preoperative versus postoperative misoprostol in elective cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 132:82–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Elsedeek MS (2012) Impact of preoperative rectal misoprostol on blood loss during and after elective cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 118:149–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rane A, Patole S, Singh M, Naidoo D, Buttener P (2003) Intravaginal Prostin gel prior to elective cesarean section at term to induce catecholamine surge in cord blood—a randomised, placebo controlled pilot study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol 43:176Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Singh M, Patole S, Rane A, Naidoo D, Buettner P (2004) Maternal intravaginal prostaglandin E2 gel before elective caesarean section at term to induce catecholamine surge in cord blood: randomised, placebo controlled study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 89:F131–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    National Collaborating Center for Women’s and Children’s Health (2011) Cesarean section: NICE clinical guideline. RCOG Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Phelan JP, Smith CV, Broussard P, Small M (1987) Amniotic fluid volume assessment with the four-quadrant technique at 36–42 weeks’ gestation. J Reprod Med 32:540–542PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lapaire O, Schneider MC, Stotz M, Surbek DV, Holzgreve W, Hoesli IM (2006) Oral misoprostol vs. intravenous oxytocin in reducing blood loss after emergency cesarean delivery. Int J Gynecol Obstet 95:2–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chaudhuri P, Banerjee GB, Mandal A (2010) Rectally administered misoprostol versus intravenous oxytocin infusion during cesarean delivery to reduce intraoperative and postoperative blood loss. Int J Gynecol Obstet 109:25–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vimala N, Mittal S, Kumar S (2006) Sublingual misoprostol versus oxytocin infusion to reduce blood loss at cesarean section. Int J Gynecol Obstet 92:106–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tang OS, Ho PC (2006) The pharmacokinetics and different regimens of misoprostol in early first-trimester medical abortion. Contraception 74:26–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khan RU, El-Refaey H (2003) Pharmacokinetics and adverse-effect profile of rectally administered misoprostol in the third stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 101:968–974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Owonikoko KM, Arowojolu AO, Okunlola MA (2011) Effect of sublingual misoprostol versus intravenous oxytocin on reducing blood loss at cesarean section in Nigeria: a randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 37:715–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhao Y, Li X, Peng Y (1998) [Clinical study on reduction of postpartum bleeding in cesarean section by misoprostol] (Article in Chinese). Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 33:403–405PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fawole AO, Sotiloye OS, Hunyinbo KI, Umezulike AC, Okunlola MA, Adekanle DA, Osamor J, Adeyanju O, Olowookere OO, Adekunle AO, Singata M, Mangesi L, Hofmeyr GJ (2011) A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of misoprostol and routine uterotonics for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 112:107–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bhullar A, Carlan SJ, Hamm J, Lamberty N, White L, Richichi K (2004) Buccal misoprostol to decrease blood loss after vaginal delivery: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 104:1282–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fekih M, Jnifene A, Fathallah K, Ben Regaya L, Memmi A, Bouguizene S, Chaieb A, Bibi M, Khairi H (2009) Intérêt du misoprostol dans la prévention de l’hémorragie du post-partum immédiat en cas de césarienne: essai prospectif randomisé [Benefit of misoprostol for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage in cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial] (Article in French). J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 38:588–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Elati A, Weeks A (2012) Risk of fever after misoprostol for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 120:1140–1148PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohamed S. Sweed
    • 1
  • Mourad M. El-Saied
    • 1
  • Amgad E. Abou-Gamrah
    • 1
  • Haitham A. El-Sabaa
    • 1
  • Mohamed M. Abdel-Hamid
    • 1
  • Hossam Hemeda
    • 1
  • Ahmed M. Mansour
    • 1
  • Mohamed E. Shawky
    • 1
  • Medhat A. El-Sayed
    • 1
  • Radwa M. Mohamed
    • 1
  1. 1.Obstetrics and Gynecology DepartmentAin Shams UniversityCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations