Advertisement

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 298, Issue 5, pp 897–902 | Cite as

The effects of tocolysis on neonatal septic death in women with PPROM: a retrospective cohort study

  • Ariel Chackowicz
  • Nicholas Czuzoj-Shulman
  • Haim Arie Abenhaim
Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • 50 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

In women with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), particularly those with suspected chorioamnionitis, the benefit of tocolysis on neonatal outcome remains unclear. Our purpose was to evaluate the effect of tocolysis on neonatal septic death in women with PPROM with and without chorioamnionitis.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was used to address our study objective. We created a cohort consisting of all live births between 24 and 32 weeks’ gestation that were registered in the Linked Birth and Infant Death data files (2009–2013) from the United States. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of tocolysis on neonatal septic death at 7 and 28 days in births with and without chorioamnionitis.

Results

Of the 46,968 births that met our inclusion criteria, tocolysis was administered to 6264 (13.3%). Tocolysis was more commonly prescribed to Caucasians, smokers, in multiple birth pregnancies, and to women with a history of preterm births. Tocolysis was not significantly associated with neonatal septic death at 7 days (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.39–1.13) or at 28 days (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.60–1.19). This was consistent in pregnancies with and without chorioamnionitis. Furthermore, tocolysis was associated with a reduced risk of neonatal septic death at 7 days when administered between 24 and 27 weeks’ gestation (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22–0.88).

Conclusions

In the setting of PPROM, tocolysis does not appear to increase the risk of neonatal septic death at 7 and 28 days. Therefore, consideration should be given to its administration if clinically indicated.

Keywords

Chorioamnionitis Neonatal septic death PPROM Tocolysis 

Notes

Author contributions

AC: Contributed to study design; interpretation of data; drafting of manuscript. NC-S: Data management; data analysis; revision of manuscript. HAA: Conception and design; acquisition of data; supervision; interpretation of data; critical revision of manuscript for important intellectual content.

Funding

No funding was received for this study. AC was a recipient of a McGill University Robert Courey Research Bursary. This was personal funding.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest. We had full control of all primary data and we agree to allow the Journal to review these data, if requested.

Ethical approval

This study used exclusively publicly available data; hence, according to the Tri-Council Policy statement (2010), institutional review board approval was not required.

Informed consent

This study used exclusively publicly available data; hence, we did not personally obtain informed consent from study subjects. This would be the responsibility of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), who sponsors the National Inpatient Sample.

References

  1. 1.
    Gynaecologists RCoO (2010) Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Caughey AB, Robinson JN, Norwitz ER (2008) Contemporary diagnosis and management of preterm premature rupture of membranes. Rev Obstet Gynecol 1:11–22PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mercer BM (2007) Is there a role for tocolytic therapy during conservative management of preterm premature rupture of the membranes? Clin Obstet Gynecol 50:487–496CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mackeen AD, Seibel-Seamon J, Grimes-Dennis J, Baxter JK, Berghella V (2011) Tocolytics for preterm premature rupture of membranes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011:CD007062Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    King JF (2004) Tocolysis and preterm labour. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 16:459–463CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kacerovsky M, Musilova I, Khatibi A, Skogstrand K, Hougaard DM, Tambor V et al (2012) Intraamniotic inflammatory response to bacteria: analysis of multiple amniotic fluid proteins in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25:2014–2019CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stepan M, Cobo T, Maly J, Navratilova M, Musilova I, Hornychova H et al (2016) Neonatal outcomes in subgroups of women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes before 34 weeks. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 29:2373–2377PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tan TC, Devendra K, Tan LK, Tan HK (2006) Tocolytic treatment for the management of preterm labour: a systematic review. Singap Med J 47:361–366Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    NCHS (2009) User guide to the 2009 period linked birth/infant death public use file. ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Dataset_Documentation/DVS/periodlinked/LinkPE09Guide.pdf. Accessed 9 Feb 2018
  10. 10.
    NCHS (2010) User guide to the 2010 period linked birth/infant death public use file. ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Dataset_Documentation/DVS/periodlinked/LinkPE10Guide.pdf. Accessed 9 Feb 2018
  11. 11.
    NCHS (2011) User guide to the 2011 period linked birth/infant death public use file. ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Dataset_Documentation/DVS/periodlinked/LinkPE11Guide.pdf. Accessed 9 Feb 2018
  12. 12.
    NCHS (2012) User guide to the 2012 period linked birth/infant death public use file. ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/health_statistics/nchs/dataset_documentation/DVS/periodlinked/LinkPE12Guide.pdf. Accessed 9 Feb 2018
  13. 13.
    NCHS (2013) User guide to the 2013 period linked birth/infant death public use file. ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Dataset_Documentation/DVS/periodlinked/LinkPE13Guide.pdf. Accessed 9 Feb 2018
  14. 14.
    Ramsey PS, Nuthalapaty FS, Lu G, Ramin S, Nuthalapaty ES, Ramin KD (2004) Contemporary management of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM): a survey of maternal–fetal medicine providers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:1497–1502CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vidaeff AC, Ramin SM (2011) Antenatal corticosteroids after preterm premature rupture of membranes. Clin Obstet Gynecol 54:337–343CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kenyon S, Boulvain M, Neilson JP (2010) Antibiotics for preterm rupture of membranes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010:CD001058Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fox NS, Gelber SE, Kalish RB, Chasen ST (2008) Contemporary practice patterns and beliefs regarding tocolysis among U.S. maternal–fetal medicine specialists. Obstet Gynecol 112:42–47CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hosli I, Sperschneider C, Drack G, Zimmermann R, Surbek D, Irion O (2014) Tocolysis for preterm labor: expert opinion. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289:903–909CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Simhan HN, Canavan TP (2005) Preterm premature rupture of membranes: diagnosis, evaluation and management strategies. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 112(Suppl 1):32–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tita ATN, Andrews WW (2010) Diagnosis and management of clinical chorioamnionitis. Clin Perinatol 37:339–354CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yoon BH, Romero R, Moon JB, Shim SS, Kim M, Kim G et al (2001) Clinical significance of intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1130–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Packard RE, Mackeen AD (2015) Labor induction in the patient with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Semin Perinatol 39:495–500CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Archabald KL, Buhimschi IA, Bahtiyar MO, Dulay AT, Abdel-Razeq SS, Pettker CM et al (2016) Limiting the Exposure of Select Fetuses to Intrauterine Infection/Inflammation Improves Short-Term Neonatal Outcomes in Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes. Fetal Diagn Therapy 42(2):99–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lorthe E, Goffinet F, Marret S, Vayssiere C, Flamant C, Quere M et al (2017) Tocolysis after preterm premature rupture of membranes and neonatal outcome: a propensity-score analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 217:212.e1–212.e12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Plummer CP (2012) Evaluation of maternal and neonatal outcomes after maintenance tocolysis: a retrospective study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 38:198–202CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Aagaard-Tillery KM, Nuthalapaty FS, Ramsey PS, Ramin KD (2005) Preterm premature rupture of membranes: perspectives surrounding controversies in management. Am J Perinatol 22:287–297CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Al-Adnani M, Sebire NJ (2007) The role of perinatal pathological examination in subclinical infection in obstetrics. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 21:505–521CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ayengar V, Madhulika Vani SN (1991) Neonatal sepsis due to vertical transmission from maternal genital tract. Indian J Pediatr 58:661–664CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ofman G, Vasco N, Cantey JB (2016) Risk of early-onset sepsis following preterm, prolonged rupture of membranes with or without chorioamnionitis. Am J Perinatol 33:339–342PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Xie A, Zhang W, Chen M, Wang Y, Wang Y, Zhou Q et al (2015) Related factors and adverse neonatal outcomes in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes complicated by histologic chorioamnionitis. Med Sci Monitor 21:390–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Arora P, Bagga R, Kalra J, Kumar P, Radhika S, Gautam V (2015) Mean gestation at delivery and histological chorioamnionitis correlates with early-onset neonatal sepsis following expectant management in pPROM. J Obstet Gynaecol 35:235–240CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Driul L, Londero AP, Adorati-Menegato A, Vogrig E, Bertozzi S, Fachechi G et al (2014) Therapy side-effects and predictive factors for preterm delivery in patients undergoing tocolysis with atosiban or ritodrine for threatened preterm labour. J Obstet Gynaecol 34:684–689CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Haas DM, Benjamin T, Sawyer R, Quinney SK (2014) Short-term tocolytics for preterm delivery—current perspectives. Int J Women’s Health 6:343–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ariel Chackowicz
    • 1
  • Nicholas Czuzoj-Shulman
    • 1
  • Haim Arie Abenhaim
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Community StudiesJewish General HospitalMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Epidemiology, Jewish General HospitalMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations