Advertisement

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 298, Issue 3, pp 561–565 | Cite as

The effect of the systematic birth preparation program on fear of vaginal delivery and quality of life

  • Mucize Eric Ozdemir
  • Isil Uzun Cilingir
  • Gulsah Ilhan
  • Elif Yildiz
  • Karolin Ohanoglu
Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • 89 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of systematic birth preparation program on fear of vaginal delivery and quality of life (QoL) in pregnant women who request elective cesarean delivery without any obstetric indication.

Methods

This study was conducted prospectively. A total of 100 women who requested elective cesarean delivery due to psychosocial reasons were included into the study. Women were divided into two groups according to their desire to participate in the systematic birth preparation program. Group A: case group (n = 50) consisted of women who participated in the systematic birth preparation program. Group B: control group (n = 50) received usual antenatal care. All patients were interviewed with questionnaires including the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) at postpartum 6th week. Type of delivery, maternal request for cesarean section, scores for QoL, and postpartum depression were compared between the two groups.

Results

Vaginal delivery rate was significantly higher in among the patients who received the systematic birth preparation program (group A: 78%, group B: 56%). Maternal request for elective cesarean section significantly decreased after the systematic birth preparation program (group A: 8%, group B: 28%). In group A, the WHOQOL-BREF-TR mean scores (SD) for physical domain, psychological domain, and environmental domain were significantly higher than the values exhibited in group B. In scores of the postpartum depression scale, there were no significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.075).

Conclusions

The current study indicates that systematic birth preparation program may decrease the rate of elective cesarean delivery by reducing fear of vaginal delivery and improve the quality of life at postpartum period.

Keywords

Pregnancy Quality of life Systematic birth preparation program Vaginal delivery 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all midwives and participants who made this study possible.

Author contributions

EOM protocol development, project development, data collection, and manuscript writing/editing. UCI protocol development and manuscript editing. IG data collection. YE data collection.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    James D, Steer P, Weiner C, Gonik B (2010) High risk pregnancy: management options—expert consult, 4th edn. Saunder, LouisGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    World Health Organization (2015) WHO statement on caesarean section rates http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/cs-statement/en/. Accessed 21 May 2017
  3. 3.
    Nieminen K, Stephansson O, Ryding EL (2009) Women’s fear of childbirth and preference for cesarean section—a cross-sectional study at various stages of pregnancy in Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88:807–813CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eynsheykh ZD, Shaahmadi F, Taslimi S, Emamiureh F, Moeinaldini S (2013) Investigating the relationship between demographic factors and choice of delivery method in pregnant women in the city of Savojbolagh. J Fam Reprod Health 7:35–38Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dellinger EH, Boehm FH, Crane MM (2000) Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: early neonatal outcomes associated with normal rate, fetal stress, and fetal distress. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:214–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cohen W, Friedman EA (1983) Management of labor. University, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom S et al (2017) Williams Obstetrics, Abnormal Labor, 24th edn. McGraw-Hill Education, p 463Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    World Health Organization (1996) WHOQOL-BREF Introduction, administration, scoring and generic version of the assessment, programme on mental health. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R (1987) Detection of postnatal depression: development of the 10 item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression scale. Br J Psychiatry 150:782–786CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kavosi Zahra, Keshtkaran Ali, Setoodehzadeh Fatemeh, Kasraeian Maryam, Khammarnia Mohammad, Eslahi Marzieh (2015) A comparison of mothers’ quality of life after normal vaginal, cesarean, and water birth deliveries. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery 3(3):198–204PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Emmanuel EN, Sun J (2014) Health related quality of life across the perinatal period among Australian women. J Clin Nurs 23(11–12):1611–1619.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12265 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Masoumi SZ, Kazemi F, Oshvandi K, Jalali M, Esmaeili-Vardanjani A, Rafiei H (2016) Effect of training preparation for childbirth on fear of normal vaginal delivery and choosing the type of delivery among pregnant women in Hamadan, Iran: a randomized controlled trial. J Family Reprod Health 10(3):115–121PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wa Sturrock, Ja Johnson (1990) The relationship between childbirth education classes and obstetric outcome. Birth 17:82–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rezaei Nazanin, Azadi Arman, Zargousi Razieh, Sadoughi Zinab, Tavalaee Zahra, Rezayati Maryam (2016) Maternal health-related quality of life and its predicting factors in the postpartum period in Iran. Scientifica (Cairo) 2016:8542147.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8542147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Akca A, Corbacioglu Esmer A, Ozyurek ES, Aydin A, Korkmaz N, Gorgen H, Akbayir O (2017) The influence of the systematic birth preparation program on childbirth satisfaction. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295(5):1127–1133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fenwick J, Toohill J, Creedy DK, Smith J, Gamble J (2015) Sources, responses and moderators of childbirth fear in Australian women: a qualitative investigation. Midwifery 31:239–246CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Serçekuş P, Okumuş H (2009) Fears associated with childbirth among nulliparous women in Turkey. Midwifery 25:155–162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Campell D (2008) Fear of pain causes a big rise in cesareans. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2008/oct/26/health-women. Accessed 19 May 2017
  19. 19.
    O’Hara MW, Swain AM (1996) Rates and risk of postpartum depression: a meta-analysis. Int Rev Psychiatry 8:37–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rahman A, Iqbal Z, Bunn J, Lovel H, Harrington R (2004) Impact of maternal depression on infant nutritional status and illness: a cohort study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 61(9):946–952.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.61.9.946 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Howard LM, Flach C, Mehay A, Sharp D, Tylee A (2011) The prevalence of suicidal ideation identified by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in postpartum women in primary care: findings from the RESPOND trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 11:57.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-11-57 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Perinatology Department, Zeynep Kamil Maternity HospitalHealth Science UniversityÜsküdar/IstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Perinatology DepartmentTrakya UniversityEdirneTurkey
  3. 3.Suleymaniye Maternity HospitalHealth Science UniversityZeytinburnu/IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations