Complicated primary cesarean delivery increases the risk for uterine rupture at subsequent trial of labor after cesarean
To evaluate whether cesarean delivery (CD) indication, labor status, and other primary CD characteristics affect the risk for uterine rupture in subsequent deliveries.
A case–control study of women attempting trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) in a single, tertiary, university-affiliated medical center (2007–2016). Deliveries complicated by uterine rupture were matched to successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) deliveries in a 1:3 ratio. Indication, labor status and post-partum complications (postpartum hemorrhage and postpartum infection) at primary CD were compared between study and control group.
During study period, there were 75,682 deliveries, of them, 3937 (5.2%) were TOLAC. Study group included 53 cases of uterine rupture at TOLAC and 159 women with successful VBAC. Women in study group had significantly lower rates of previous VBAC (15.1 vs. 28.9%, p = 0.047). Rate of postpartum complications at primary CD was significantly higher in women with TOLAC complicated by uterine rupture (7.5 vs. 1.9%, respectively, p = 0.042). Utilizing the multivariate logistic regression analysis, postpartum complications remained an independent risk factor for uterine rupture in the following TOLAC (aOR 4.07, 95% CI 1.14–14.58, p = 0.031).
Postpartum hemorrhage and infection, in primary CD, seem to be associated with increased risk for uterine rupture during subsequent TOLAC.
KeywordsCesarean delivery Trial of labor after cesarean Uterine rupture VBAC Post-partum hemorrhage
LS: concept and design, data acquisition, data interpretation, manuscript editing. LH: data acquisition and interpretation, manuscript revision. AS: data acquisition and interpretation, manuscript revision. EK: data acquisition and interpretation, manuscript revision. AW: concept of design, data analysis, manuscript revision. RGB: concept and design, data acquisition, data interpretation, manuscript editing.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.
- 18.El Refaeey AEA, Abdelfattah H, Mosbah A et al (2017) Is early intervention using Mansoura-VV uterine compression sutures an effective procedure in the management of primary atonic postpartum hemorrhage? : a prospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 17(1):160CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 19.Krispin E, Hiersch L, Wilk Goldsher Y, Wiznitzer A, Yogev Y, Ashwal E (2017) Association between prior vaginal birth after cesarean and subsequent labor outcome. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med 27:1–7Google Scholar
- 20.Vigorito R, Montemango R, Sconne G, De Stefano R (2016) Obstetric outcome associated with trial of labor in women with three perior cesarean delivery and at least one prior vaginal birth in an area with a particulary high rate of cesarean delivery. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med 29(22):3741–3743CrossRefGoogle Scholar