Foetal thymus size in pregnancies after assisted reproductive technologies
The aim of our study was to compare thymus sizes in foetuses conceived using assisted reproductive technologies (ART) to those conceived naturally (control group).
Sonographic foetal thymus size was assessed retrospectively in 162 pregnancies conceived using ART and in 774 pregnancies conceived naturally. The anteroposterior thymic and the intrathoracic mediastinal diameter were measured to calculate the thymic–thoracic ratio (TT-ratio). The ART cases were subdivided into two groups: (1) intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI; n = 109) and (2) in vitro fertilisation (IVF; n = 53).
The TT-ratio was smaller in pregnancies conceived using ART (p < 0.001). In both ART subgroups (ICSI and IVF), the TT-ratio was lower compared to the control group (p < 0.001). However, no difference between the two subgroups could be detected (p = 0.203).
Our data show reduced thymus size in foetuses conceived using ART compared to controls. These findings indicate that the use of ART may lead to certain deviations in organogenesis.
KeywordsIn vitro fertilisation Intracytoplasmic sperm injection Ultrasound Thymus Foetal diagnosis Prenatal ultrasonography Pregnancy
We thank everyone who voluntarily dedicated their time and effort.
TGN: data collection, data management, data analysis and manuscript writing. KOM: data collection and manuscript editing. MM: data collection and manuscript editing. JB: data collection and manuscript editing. REA: manuscript editing. JS: data collection and manuscript editing. WK: data collection and manuscript editing. MB: statistics and manuscript editing. RS: project construction, data collection and manuscript revision.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Our study was planned in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The institutional review board approved this study and required neither patient approval nor informed consent for our retrospective analysis of data that were obtained using a standard of care clinical protocol.
Human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
- 2.Fauser BC, Devroey P, Diedrich K, Balaban B, Bonduelle M, Delemarre-van de Waal HA, Estella C, Ezcurra D, Geraedts JP, Howles CM, Lerner-Geva L, Serna J, Wells D, Evian Annual Reproduction (EVAR) Workshop Group 2011 (2014) Health outcomes of children born after IVF/ICSI: a review of current expert opinion and literature. Reprod Biomed. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.10.013
- 3.Pinborg A, Wennerholm UB, Romundstad LB, Loft A, Aittomaki K, Soderstrom-Anttila V, Nygren KG, Hazekamp J, Bergh C (2013) Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dms044
- 6.Royster GD, Krishnamoorthy K, Csokmay JM, Yauger BJ, Chason RJ, DeCherney AH, Wolff EF, Hill MJ (2016) Are intracytoplasmic sperm injection and high serum estradiol compounding risk factors for adverse obstetric outcomes in assisted reproductive technology? Fertil Steril. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.04.023 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 33.Delle Piane L, Lin W, Liu X, Donjacour A, Minasi P, Revelli A, Maltepe E, Rinaudo PF (2010) Effect of the method of conception and embryo transfer procedure on mid-gestation placenta and fetal development in an IVF mouse model. Hum Reprod. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq165 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 35.Drost M (2007) Complications during gestation in the cow. Theriogenology 68:487–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.04.023 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 42.Rinaudo P, Wang E (2012) Fetal programming and metabolic syndrome. Annu Rev Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-020911-153245 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 44.Salilew-Wondim D, Tesfaye D, Hossain M, Held E, Rings F, Tholen E, Looft C, Cinar U, Schellander K, Hoelker M (2013) Aberrant placenta gene expression pattern in bovine pregnancies established after transfer of cloned or in vitro produced embryos. Physiol Genomics. https://doi.org/10.1152/physiolgenomics.00076.2012 PubMedGoogle Scholar