Advertisement

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 295, Issue 2, pp 265–267 | Cite as

European Network of Trainees in Obstetrics and Gynaecology: experiences from the 2016 exchange programme in Turin, Italy

  • Sabine EismannEmail author
  • Mario Brandl
  • Laura Spinnewijn
  • Caroline Everden
  • Federica Campolo
  • Sarah Schott
News and Views

Abstract

Introduction

The European Network of Trainees in Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ENTOG) is an organization representing trainees from 30 European member countries. Together with the European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG), it seeks to achieve the highest possible standards of training and consequently to improve the quality of medical care in the field of gynaecology and obstetrics. Every year, the ENTOG council meets and holds a scientific meeting in a different European country. To coincide with this, the host country arranges an exchange, to which each member country can send two trainees. This exchange allows trainees to gain insight into both daily clinical work and the structure of the health care system.

Methods

This article reports the experiences of participants in the May 2016 ENTOG exchange to Turin, Italy. The aim is to outline differences in training between Germany and Italy as well as some striking differences with other European countries.

Perspective

The participants’ personal benefit from this unique experience was not only to get familiar with the Italian trainee programme and health care system, but also to exchange experiences among representatives from other European countries and build up a young gynaecological network within Europe.

Keywords

EBCOG ENTOG Residency European trainee exchange Obstetrics and gynaecology 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

LS, AA, and SS are members of the ENTOG board resp. country representatives.

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest by any of the authors.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    European Board & College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (2016) Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cattin J, Nyangoh TK, Nizard J (2015) [ENTOG annual exchange programme, Glasgow-Scotland, May 2014]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 44(3):289–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hermann M, Boyon C (2013) ENTOG annual exchange programme and congress, Bratislava (Slovakia), May 6–11th, 2013. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 42(5):503–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mouremble O, Viaris de Lesegno B, Nizard J (2010) ENTOG 2009 exchange programme and annual meeting. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 39(1):83–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martins N et al (2010) ENTOG, European Network of Trainees in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2(1):59–61PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Janson PO (2001) Organizations of European Obstetricians and Gynecologists: NFOG, EBCOG, EAGO and ENTOG, what do they do and what do they want? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80(5):381–382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bogdanyova S et al (2015) Becoming a resident in Germany: an experience-based practical guideline. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291(2):457–460CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schott S et al (2014) Four-country meeting on residency in France, Germany, The Netherlands and UK: 4 countries, 4 ways. Arch Gynecol Obstet 290(5):833–837CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hemminki E, Heino A, Gissler M (2011) Should births be centralised in higher level hospitals? Experiences from regionalised health care in Finland. BJOG 118(10):1186–1195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guidelines Committee of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2010) Late Intrauterine Fetal Death and Stillbirth. RCOG Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    OECD (2015) Health at a Glance 2015: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing Group, ParisGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Macfarlane AJ et al (2016) Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study. BJOG 123(4):559–568CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aabakke AJ et al (2016) European trainees support the new European curriculum in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 203:335–336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University Hospital HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.Albertinen-HospitalHamburgGermany
  3. 3.Radboud University Medical CentreNijmegenNetherlands
  4. 4.St. George′s University of LondonLondonUK
  5. 5.S. Anna HospitalCatanzaroItaly
  6. 6.University of TurinTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations