Advertisement

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 293, Issue 1, pp 69–74 | Cite as

Anticoagulant management of pregnant women with mechanical heart valve replacement during perioperative period

  • Ce Bian
  • Xiaorong Qi
  • Li Li
  • Jitong Zhao
  • Xinghui LiuEmail author
Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the morbidity of complications and pregnancy outcomes in women with mechanical heart valve replacement who received low-dose oral anticoagulation treatment with warfarin throughout the pregnancy, compare the prognosis and complications of patients who were treated with single oral warfarin treatment or the “bridging” therapy treatment, investigate the influence of using vitamin K1 before emergency cesarean section delivery on postoperative warfarin anticoagulant effect and to explore an appropriate anticoagulant regimen during perioperative period for pregnant women with mechanical heart valve replacement.

Method

46 pregnant women with mechanical heart valve replacement who received low-dose oral anticoagulation treatment from October 2008 to October 2014 treated at West China Women’s and Children’s Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Eight patients received emergency cesarean section (CS), while 38 patients received selective CS, in which 17 patients received single oral warfarin and 21 patients received “bridging” anticoagulation treatment during postoperative period. Morbidity of complications and the time to achieve the target INR after operation were compared.

Results

The mechanical valves were at the mitral position in 35 (76.09 %) patients, at the aortic position in 2 (4.35 %) patient and at both the mitral and aortic position in 9 (19.57 %) patients. 46 full-term healthy babies were delivered and no maternal thromboembolic was observed during pregnancy. There was no significant difference of the amount of uterine bleeding between single oral warfarin group and “bridging” treatment group during postpartum period. In single oral warfarin group, one valve thrombosis was observed and led to sudden death. No periphery thrombosis, hematoma, general hemorrhage or other sign of over-anticoagulation was observed. The INR increased more slowly in the group who received emergency CS with preoperative application of vitamin K1 than other two groups.

Conclusion

The use of vitamin K1 preoperatively might result in warfarin resistance and discontinuation of warfarin therapy before selective CS might be more appropriate than application of vitamin K1. The “bridging” anticoagulation treatment which combines oral warfarin and subcutaneous LMWH might be more effective and safer than single oral warfarin therapy for patients with mechanical heart valve replacement during postoperative period, no matter selective or emergency CS. The safety of low-dose oral warfarin therapy throughout pregnancy is still under controversy.

Keywords

Mechanical heart valve Pregnancy Anticoagulation Warfarin Vitamin K1 Perioperative period 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Limet R, Grondin CM (1977) Cardiac valve prostheses, anticoagulation, and pregnancy. Ann Thorac Surg 23(4):337–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Salazar E, Izaguirre R, Verdejo J, Mutchinick O (1996) Failure of adjusted doses of subcutaneous heparin to prevent thromboembolic phenomena in pregnant patients with mechanical cardiac valve prostheses. J Am Coll Cardiol 27(7):1698–1703PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pieper PG, Balci A, Van Dijk AP (2008) Pregnancy in women with prosthetic heart valves. Neth Heart J 16(12):406–411PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chan WS, Anand S, Ginsberg JS (2000) Anticoagulation of pregnant women with mechanical heart valves: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Intern Med 160(2):191–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schaefer C, Hannemann D, Meister R, Elefant E, Paulus W, Vial T, Reuvers M, Robert-Gnansia E, Arnon J, De Santis M, Clementi M, Rodriguez-Pinilla E, Dolivo A, Merlob P (2006) Vitamin K antagonists and pregnancy outcome. A multi-centre prospective study. Thromb Haemost 95(6):949–957PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vitale N, De Feo M, De Santo LS, Pollice A, Tedesco N, Cotrufo M (1999) Dose-dependent fetal complications of warfarin in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 33(6):1637–1641PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    van Driel D, Wesseling J, Sauer PJ, Touwen BC, van der Veer E, Heymans HS (2002) Teratogen update: fetal effects after in utero exposure to coumarins overview of cases, follow-up findings, and pathogenesis. Teratology 66(3):127–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bian C, Wei Q, Liu X (2012) Influence of heart-valve replacement of warfarin anticoagulant therapy on perinatal outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285(2):347–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Santo LS, Romano G, Della Corte A, D’Oria V, Nappi G, Giordano S, Cotrufo M, De Feo M (2012) Mechanical aortic valve replacement in young women planning on pregnancy: maternal and fetal outcomes under low oral anticoagulation, a pilot observational study on a comprehensive pre-operative counseling protocol. J Am Coll Cardiol 59(12):1110–1115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cannegieter SC, Torn M, Rosendaal FR (1999) Oral anticoagulant treatment in patients with mechanical heart valves: how to reduce the risk of thromboembolic and bleeding complications. J Intern Med 245(4):369–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dong L, Shi YK (1996) Anticoagulation therapy of patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses: follow-up survey of 126 cases. Chin J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 12:149–151Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dong L, Shi YK, Tian ZP, Ma JY, Wang X, Yi J (2003) Low intensity anticoagulation therapy after mechanical heart valve replacement. Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chin J Surg] 41(4):250–252Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Montalescot G, Polle V, Collet JP, Leprince P, Bellanger A, Gandjbakhch I, Thomas D (2000) Low molecular weight heparin after mechanical heart valve replacement. Circulation 101(10):1083–1086PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Patriquin C, Crowther M (2011) Treatment of warfarin-associated coagulopathy with vitamin K. Expert Rev Hematol 4(6):657–665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Higa T, Okura H, Tanemoto K, Yoshida K (2014) Prosthetic valve thrombosis caused by heparin-induced thrombocytopenia thrombosis during pregnancy. Circ J 78(4):1004–1005PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cade JF, Hirsh J, Martin M (1969) Placental barrier to coagulation factors: its relevance to the coagulation defect at birth and to haemorrhage in the newborn. Br Med J 2(5652):281–283PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cotrufo M, de Luca TS, Calabro R, Mastrogiovanni G, Lama D (1991) Coumarin anticoagulation during pregnancy in patients with mechanical valve prostheses. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 5(6):300–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hassouna A, Allam H (2014) Limited dose warfarin throughout pregnancy in patients with mechanical heart valve prosthesis: a meta-analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 18(6):797–806PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ce Bian
    • 1
  • Xiaorong Qi
    • 1
  • Li Li
    • 1
  • Jitong Zhao
    • 1
  • Xinghui Liu
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sichuan Provincial Key Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Key Laboratory of Obstetric and Gynecologic and Pediatric Diseases and Birth Defects of Ministry of Education, West China Women’s and Children’s HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations