Biochemical pregnancy and spontaneous abortion in first IVF cycles are negative predictors for subsequent cycles: an over 10,000 cases cohort study
To identify whether biochemical pregnancy (BP) and spontaneous abortion (SA) cases have the same clinical characteristics in assisted reproductive therapy (ART), and to assess its predictive value for the subsequent cycles.
Retrospectively reviewed 12,174 cycles in the first in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cycle from January 2009 to December 2012 of Peking University Third Hospital Reproductive Medical Center. Besides those patients who reached ongoing pregnancy stage, 7,598 cases were divided into three groups: group 1, lack of pregnancy (n = 6,651); group 2, BP (n = 520); and group 3, SA (n = 427). We compared the basic status of patients of the three groups, including ages, body mass index, basic hormone levels, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols, amount of gonadotropin use, and endometrium thickness. The reproductive outcome of the next embryo transfer cycles of the three groups was analyzed.
520 patients ended as BP, and 427 patients ended as SA. The age, primary infertility proportion, body mass index, basic FSH level and basic E2 level were similar among groups. Endometrial thickness, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocol, Gn dosage, average oocyte retrieval and ET numbers were also similar. Multivariate analysis showed that only the age (P = 0.037, OR 1.060, 95 % CI 1.001–1.120) and endometrium thickness on hCG administration day (P = 0.029, OR 1.136, 95 % CI 1.013–1.275) may result in the differences between BP and SA groups. In the subsequent ET cycles, the total BP rate was 4.37 %, clinical pregnancy rate was 37.28 %, and miscarriage rate was 8.18 %. The clinical pregnancy rates were similar among groups. However, BP group still had the highest BP rate (P < 0.05, 7.97 vs. 4.01 % and 5.28 %), BP and SA group had higher miscarriage rate (P < 0.05, 11.76 % and 14.75 vs. 7.41 %).
BP and SA in first IVF cycles had negative predictive value for subsequent ART outcomes.
KeywordsBiochemical pregnancy Spontaneous abortion Predictive value Clinical significance In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer
We appreciate Dr. Lixue Chen for statistic support and Dr. Hai Na for his assistance in revision of the article.
Conflict of interest
The manuscript has been seen and approved by all authors and has no conflicts of interest for any of the authors.
- 2.Taylor T, Eliott G, Wright J et al. (2004) Biochemical pregnancy occur more frequently when transferred embryo quality is diminished on day 3 irrespective to overall embryo quality: the role of positive selection. In: Abstracts of the 20th Annual Meeting of the ESHRE, Berlin, Germany, 27–30 June 2004, O-203Google Scholar
- 6.Abdallah RT, Singer T, Huang J et al. (2010) Endometrial polyps smaller than 2 cm increase the risk of biochemical pregnancy in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. Fertil Steril S243:P-522Google Scholar
- 10.Serra VS, Vidal C, Bellver J et al. (2006) Biochemical pregnancy: Clinical significance in assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril S145:P-87Google Scholar
- 11.Christiansen OB (2011) Biochemical pregnancies—shall they count in the recurrent miscarriage diagnosis? Symp Abstr/J Reprod Immunol 90(131–163):S45Google Scholar
- 12.Sunkara SK, Coomarasamy A, Khalaf Y et al (2007) A three-arm randomised controlled trial comparing Gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist long regimen versus GnRH agonist short regimen versus GnRH antagonist regimen in women with a history of poor ovarian response undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment: poor responders intervention trial (PRINT). Reprod Health 4:12PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Long W, Yin TL, Zhao QH et al (2011) An analysis of biochemical pregnancy rate and its causes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles (Electronic Edition). Chin J Clin 5(17):5154–5157Google Scholar
- 16.Zou L, Peng CL, Ma TZ et al (2014) The analysis on related factors of 53 intrauterine insemination cycles terminated in biochemical pregnancy or clinical pregnancy. Chin J Fam Plan Gynecotokol 6(1):58–60Google Scholar
- 19.Lin L, Quan S, Chen LN et al (2010) The Effects of oocyte and embryo quality on the occurrence of biochemical pregnancy. Guangdong Med J 31(19):2496–2498Google Scholar
- 21.Han LF, Zhang L, Jing WN et al (2006) An analysis of lymphocyte immune therapy on 38 cases of repeated biochemical pregnancy. J Pract Obstet Gynecol 22(5):316–317Google Scholar