The risk of ectopic pregnancy following GnRH agonist triggering compared with hCG triggering in GnRH antagonist ivf cycles
- 458 Downloads
The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of ectopic pregnancy in GnRH agonist triggered IVF cycles with intensive luteal support versus hCG triggered IVF cycles.
This study was conducted as a retrospective cohort analysis of women who underwent IVF treatment employing GnRH agonist or recombinant hCG (rhCG) triggers during 2-year period. The medical charts of women who achieved pregnancies were reviewed and their demographic characteristics, infertility reasons and IVF data were recorded. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the association between the triggering medication used to stimulate final oocyte maturation (GnRHa or rhCG) and EP, with adjustment for important confounders: the day of embryo transfer (ETD), the etiology of infertility and estrogen level at the time of triggering.
The number of metaphase II oocytes, fertilized oocytes and good quality embryos were significantly higher in the GnRH agonist triggered group compared with the hCG triggered group (p < 0.001 for all). The clinical pregnancy and implantation rates in the hCG triggered cycles were 38.6 and 31.1 %, respectively and 24.7 and 22 %, respectively in the triptorelin triggered cycles. The ectopic pregnancy rates were 5.3 % in the triptorelin triggered group and 1.4 % in the hCG triggered group. The trigger medication and the day of embryo transfer were found to have a significant effect on the probability of developing ectopic pregnancy (p = 0.028, p = 0.046 respectively). However, the estrogen level was not found to have a significant effect on the probability of developing ectopic pregnancy (p = 0.447).
The reasons for higher ectopic pregnancy rates in GnRH agonist triggered cycles relative to hCG triggered cycles may be the decreased receptivity of the endometrium due to insufficient luteal support and higher implantation potential of embryos in correlation with a higher number of good quality embryos obtained in these cycles.
KeywordsGnRH agonist trigger Luteal support Ectopic pregnancy Clinical pregnancy hCG IVF
Conflict of interest
All the authors state that there is no conflict of interest to disclose.
- 3.Itskovitz-Eldor J, Kol S, Mannaerts B (2000) Use of a single bolus of GnRH agonist triptorelin to trigger ovulation after GnRH antagonist ganirelix treatment in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction, with special reference to the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: preliminary report: short communication. Hum Reprod 15(9):1965–1968PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Engmann L, DiLuigi A, Schmidt D, Nulsen J, Maier D, Benadiva C (2008) The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to induce oocyte maturation after cotreatment with GnRH antagonist in high-risk patients undergoing in vitro fertilization prevents the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a prospective randomized controlled study. Fertil Steril 89(1):84–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Kolibianakis EM, Schultze-Mosgau A, Schroer A, van Steirteghem A, Devroey P, Diedrich K, Griesinger G (2005) A lower ongoing pregnancy rate can be expected when GnRH agonist is used for triggering final oocyte maturation instead of HCG in patients undergoing IVF with GnRH antagonists. Hum Reprod 20(10):2887–2892PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Babayof R, Margalioth EJ, Huleihel M, Amash A, Zylber-Haran E, Gal M, Brooks B, Mimoni T, Eldar-Geva T (2006) Serum inhibin A, VEGF and TNFalpha levels after triggering oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist compared with HCG in women with polycystic ovaries undergoing IVF treatment: a prospective randomized trial. Hum Reprod 21(5):1260–1265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Imbar T, Kol S, Lossos F, Bdolah Y, Hurwitz A, Haimov- Kochman R (2012) Reproductive outcome of fresh or frozen-thawed embryo transfer is similar in high-risk patients for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome using GnRH agonist for final oocyte maturation and intensive luteal support. Hum Reprod 27(3):753–759PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Iliodromiti S, Blockeel C, Tremellen KP, Fleming R, Tournaye H, Humaidan P, Nelson SM (2013) Consistent high clinical pregnancy rates and low ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome rates in high-risk patients after GnRH agonist triggering and modified luteal support: a retrospective multicentre study. Hum Reprod 28(9):2529–2536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Iliodromiti S, Lan VT, Tuong HM, Tuan PH, Humaidan P, Nelson SM (2013) Impact of GnRH agonist triggering and intensive luteal steroid support on live-birth rates and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a retrospective cohort study. J Ovarian Res 26: 93. http://www.ovarianresearch.com/content/6/1/93
- 20.Humaidan P, Bredkjaer HE, Westergaard LG, Andersen CY (2010) 1,500 IU human chorionic gonadotropin administered at oocyte retrieval rescues the luteal phase when gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist is used for ovulation induction: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril 93(3):847–854PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Bermejo A, Cerrillo M, Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, Simón C, Pellicer A, Garcia-Velasco JA (2014) Impact of final oocyte maturation using gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist triggering and different luteal support protocols on endometrial gene expression. Fertil Steril 101(1):138–146.e3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Humaidan P, Van Vaerenbergh I, Bourgain C, Alsbjerg B, Blockeel C, Schuit F (2012) Endometrial gene expression in the early luteal phase is impacted by mode of triggering final oocyte maturation in recFSH stimulated and GnRH antagonist cotreated IVF cycles. Hum Reprod 27(11):3259–3272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar