Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 290, Issue 6, pp 1273–1274 | Cite as

An unusual long-term complication of transobturator polypropylene mesh

Case Report

Abstract

Serious complications associated with surgical mesh for transvaginal repair of POP, as infections, vaginal mesh exposure, painful mesh shrinkage and dyspareunia, are not rare. A 48-year-old woman underwent the Perigee procedure because of a stage 3 anterior wall prolapse. Eleven months after surgery, the patient became suddenly unable to walk because of a strong pain to the left thigh root after running. The MRI revealed an external obturator left muscle hyperintensity consistent with muscular oedema; the patient was treated with oral corticosteroids with a complete resolution of the pain. We could hypothesize that the posterior arm of the mesh caused a laceration of the muscles of the obturator space with consequent oedema and pain. The use of the meshes in prolapse surgery can cause unexpected long-term complications.

Keywords

Cystocele Vaginal surgery Obturator space Vaginal mesh Complications 

References

  1. 1.
    Chu LC, Chuang FC, Kung FT, Huang KH (2012) Comparison of short-term outcomes following pelvic reconstruction with Perigee and Apogee Systems: hysterectomy or not? Int Urogynecol J 23(1):79–84PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moore RD, Beyer RD, Jacoby K, Freedman SJ, McCammon KA, Gambla MT (2011) Prospective multicenter trial assessing type I, polypropylene mesh placed via transobturator route for the treatment of anterior vaginal prolapse with 2-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J 21(5):545–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Altman D, Väyrynen T, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Falconer C, Nordic Transvaginal Mesh Group (2011) Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse. N Engl J Med 364(19):1826–1836PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Withagen MI, Milani AL, den Boon J, Vervest HA, Vierhout ME (2011) Trocar-guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 117:242–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jonsson Funk M, Visco AG, Weidner AC, Pate V, Wu JM (2013) Long-term outcomes of vaginal mesh versus native tissue repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 24(8):1279–1285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feiner B, O’Rourke P, Maher C (2012) A prospective comparison of two commercial mesh kits in the management of anterior vaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 23(3):279–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Sartore
    • 1
  • Floriana Zennaro
    • 2
  • Rubina Banco
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo GarofoloTriesteItaly
  2. 2.Pediatric RadiologyInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo GarofoloTriesteItaly

Personalised recommendations