Robot-assisted hysterectomy compared to open and laparoscopic approaches: systematic review and meta-analysis
- First Online:
- 1k Downloads
To review the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted hysterectomy compared to traditional open and conventional laparoscopic surgery, differentiating radical, simple total with node staging, and simple total hysterectomy.
Medline, Embase, the Cochrane library, and the Journal of Robotic Surgery were searched for controlled trials and observational studies with historic or concurrent controls. Data were pooled using random effects meta-analysis.
Compared to open surgery, robot-assisted radical hysterectomy is associated with reduced hospital stay and blood transfusions. For simple total hysterectomy with node staging, robot-assisted surgery is associated with reduced hospital stay, complications, and blood transfusions compared to open surgery. Compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery, robot-assisted simple total hysterectomy with node staging is associated with complications and conversions.
Compared to open surgery, robot-assisted hysterectomy offers benefits for reduced length of hospital stay and blood transfusions. The best evidence of improved outcomes is for simple total hysterectomy with node staging. Study quality was poor.
KeywordsHysterectomy Meta-analysis Robot-assisted Systematic review
- 2.Ho C, Tsakonas E, Tran K, Cimon K, Severn M, Mierzwinski-Urban M et al (2011) Robot-assisted surgery compared with open surgery and laparoscopic surgery: clinical effectiveness and economic analyses. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, OttawaGoogle Scholar
- 4.Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, Norris S, Falck-Ytter Y, Glasziou P, DeBeer H, Jaeschke R, Rind D, Meerpohl J, Dahm P, Schünemann HJ (2011) GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J clin epidemiol 64(4):383–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ (2001) Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis. Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG (eds.) Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context edition. London: BMJ Publishing Group, pp 285–312Google Scholar
- 9.R: A language and environment for statistical computing [computer program] (2011) R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- 10.Viechtbauer W (2010) Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw 36(3):1–48Google Scholar
- 19.Nezhat FR, Datta MS, LIu C, Chuang L, Zakashansky K (2008) Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 12(3):227–237Google Scholar
- 25.Nezhat C, Lavie O, Lemyre M, Gemer O, Bhagan L (2009) Laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without a robot: Stanford experience. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 13(2):125–128Google Scholar
- 28.Shashoua AR, Gill D, Locher SR (2009) Robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 13(3):364–369Google Scholar
- 32.Giep B, Giep H, Hubert H (2010) Comparison of minimally invasive surgical approaches for hysterectomy at a community hospital: robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. J Robot Surg 4(3):167–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Lim PC, Kang E, Park dH (2011) A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients. Gynecol Oncol 120(3):413–418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Health Information and Quality Authority (2011) Health technology assessment of robot-assisted surgery in selected surgical procedures. DublinGoogle Scholar
- 48.Hohwü L, Borre M, Ehlers L, Venborg Pedersen K (2011) A short-term cost-effectiveness study comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Med Econ 14:403–409Google Scholar