Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 287, Issue 5, pp 893–899

The association of a cervical length of <25 mm in high-risk pregnancies on neonatal morbidity and mortality in preterm infants

  • Mehmet Yekta Oncel
  • Sema Arayici
  • Sevki Celen
  • Gulsum Kadioglu Simsek
  • Asli Oskovi
  • Nurdan Uras
  • Serife Suna Oguz
  • Omer Erdeve
  • Nuri Danisman
  • Ugur Dilmen
Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate and compare the effects of a short cervix (<25 mm) on neonatal morbidity and mortality as opposed to a normal cervical length (≥25 mm). The predictive value of a short cervix on neonatal outcome is also investigated.

Methods

Preterm infants who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit and whose mothers had undergone a pre-delivery evaluation for cervical length (CL) and cervical cultures were included in the study. Infants were stratified into two groups based on CL measurements (Group 1, CL < 25 mm; Group 2, CL ≥ 25 mm).

Results

A total of 203 infants were included in the final analysis. Group 1 consisted of 105 neonates while Group 2 had 98 newborns. Cervical culture positivity rate was 46.7 % (n = 49) in Group 1 compared to 19.4 % (n = 19) in Group 2 (p = 0.0001). Frequencies of early onset neonatal sepsis (EOS) in Group 1 and Group 2 were 31.5 and 18.4 %, respectively (p = 0.032), whereas respective frequencies of proven sepsis in the two groups were 18.1 and 8.2 % (p = 0.037). A CL < 25 mm was found to increase the risk of cervical culture positivity, EOS and proven EOS by odds ratios of 3.63, 2.03 and 2.48, respectively.

Conclusions

This is the first clinical study to demonstrate a significant link between CL and each of cervical culture positivity, EOS and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Preterm infants born to high-risk mothers with short CL should be monitored closely for the risk of EOS.

Keywords

Cervical length Cervical culture Neonatal sepsis Neonatal morbidity Neonatal mortality 

References

  1. 1.
    Spong C (2007) Prediction and prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 110:415Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Owen J, Yost N, Berghella V, Thom E, Swain M, Dildy GA 3rd, Miodovnik M, Langer O, Sibai B, McNellis D, for the National Institute for Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network (2001) Mid-trimester endovaginal sonography in women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth. JAMA 286:1340–1348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crane JM, Hutchens D (2008) Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length to predict preterm birth in asymptomatic women at increased risk: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:579–587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Honest H, Bachman LM, Coomarasamy A, Gupta JK, Kleijnen J, Khan KS (2003) Accuracy of cervical transvaginal sonography in predicting preterm birth: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22:305–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, Thom E, McNellis D, Copper RL, Johnson F, Roberts JM (1996) The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. N Engl J Med 334:567–572PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cook CM, Ellwood DA (2000) The cervix as a predictor of preterm delivery in ‘at-risk’ women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 15:109–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hassan SS, Romero R, Berry SM, Dang K, Blackwell SC, Treadwell MC, Wolfe HM (2000) Patients with an ultrasonographic cervical length ≤15 mm have nearly a 50 % risk of early spontaneous preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1458–1467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rizzo G, Capponi A, Angelini E, Vlachopoulou A, Grassi C, Romanini C (1998) The value of transvaginal ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix in predicting preterm delivery in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 11:23–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gire C, Faggianelli P, Nicaise C, Shojai R, Fiori A, Chau C, Boubli L, D’Ercole C (2002) Ultrasonographic evaluation of cervical length in pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19:565–569PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Owen J, Szychowski JM, Hankins G, Iams JD, Sheffield JS, Perez-Delboy A, Berghella V, Wing DA, Guzman ER, Vaginal Ultrasound Trial Consortium (2010) Does midtrimester cervical length ≥25 mm predict preterm birth in high-risk women? Am J Obstet Gynecol 203:393.e1–e5Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Czajka R, Rzepka R, Kwiatkowski S, Torbe A (2010) Vaginal and cervical bacterial colonization in patients with threatening preterm labor. Ginekol Pol 81:840–843PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hutzal CE, Boyle EM, Kenyon S (2008) Use of antibiotics for the treatment of preterm parturition and prevention of neonatal morbidity: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martius J, Eschenbach DA (1990) The role of bacterial vaginosis as a cause of amniotic fluid infection, chorioamnionitis and prematurity–a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 247:1–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haque KN (2005) Definitions of bloodstream infection in the newborn. Pediatr Crit Care Med 6:45–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kiefer DG, Keeler SM, Rust OA, Wayock CP, Vintzileos AM, Hanna N (2009) Is midtrimester short cervix a sign of intraamniotic inflammation? Am J Obstet Gynecol 200:374.e1–e5Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rizzo G, Capponi A, Vlachopoulou A, Angelini E, Grassi C, Romanini C (1998) Ultrasonographic assessment of the uterine cervix and interleukin-8 concentrations in cervical secretions predict intrauterine infection in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 12:86–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tsoi E, Akmal S, Rane S, Otigbah C, Nicolaides KH (2003) Ultrasound assessment of cervical length in threatened preterm labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21:552–555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fuchs IB, Heinrich W, Osthues K, Dudenhausen JW (2004) Sonographic cervical length in singleton pregnancies with intact membranes presenting with preterm labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24:554–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gomez R, Galasso M, Romero R, Mazor M, Sorokin Y, Goncalves L, Treadwell M (1994) Ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix is better than cervical digital examination as a predictor of the likelihood of premature delivery in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 24:554–557Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guzman ER, Walters C, Ananth CV, O’Reilly-Green C, Benito CW, Palermo A, Vintzileos AM (2001) A comparison of sonographic cervical parameters in predicting spontaneous preterm birth in high-risk singelton gestations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:204–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gomez R, Romero R, Nien JK, Chaiworapongsa T, Medina L, Kim YM, Yoon BH, Carstens M, Espinoza J, Iams JD, Gonzalez R (2005) A short cervix in women with preterm labor and intact membranes: a risk factor for microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:678–689PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hong JS, Park KH, Noh JH, Suh YH (2007) Cervical length and the risk of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes. J Korean Med Sci 22:713–717PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Iams JD, for the NICHD MFMU Network. Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network (1997) The Preterm prediction study: cervical length and perinatal infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 176:S6Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    DiGiulio DB (2012) Diversity of microbes in amniotic fluid. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 17:2–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Onal EE, Kitapçi F, Dilmen U, Adam B (1999) Interleukin-6 concentrations in neonatal sepsis. Lancet 353:239–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Celik IH, Demirel FG, Uras N, Oguz SS, Erdeve O, Biyikli Z, Dilmen U (2010) What are the cut-off levels for IL-6 and CRP in neonatal sepsis? J Clin Lab Anal 24:407–412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Oncel MY, Dilmen U, Erdeve O, Ozdemir R, Calisici E, Yurttutan S, Canpolat FE, Oguz SS, Uras N (2012) Proadrenomedullin as a prognostic marker in neonatal sepsis. Pediatr Res doi:10.1038/pr.2012.106. [Epub ahead of print]
  28. 28.
    Cahill AG, Odibo AO, Caughey AB, Stamilio DM, Hassan SS, Macones GA, Romero R (2010) Universal cervical length screening and treatment with vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth: a decision and economic analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202:548.e1–e8Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mehmet Yekta Oncel
    • 1
  • Sema Arayici
    • 1
  • Sevki Celen
    • 2
  • Gulsum Kadioglu Simsek
    • 1
  • Asli Oskovi
    • 2
  • Nurdan Uras
    • 1
  • Serife Suna Oguz
    • 1
  • Omer Erdeve
    • 3
  • Nuri Danisman
    • 2
  • Ugur Dilmen
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Division of NeonatologyZekai Tahir Burak Maternity Teaching HospitalAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Division of PerinatologyZekai Tahir Burak Maternity Teaching HospitalAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, School of MedicineAnkara UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  4. 4.Department of Pediatrics, School of MedicineYıldırım Beyazıt UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations