Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 287, Issue 2, pp 357–360 | Cite as

Hysteroscopic findings in women with recurrent IVF failures and the effect of correction of hysteroscopic findings on subsequent pregnancy rates

  • Pinar Cenksoy
  • Cem Ficicioglu
  • Gazi Yıldırım
  • Mert Yesiladali
Reproductive Medicine



Our aim is to evaluate the incidence of unrecognized uterine abnormalities in cases with recurrent IVF failure by screening office hysteroscopy (OH), and impacts of treatment of hysteroscopic findings on the success rate of IVF.

Materials and methods

The retrospective and descriptive study was conducted at assisted reproduction unit in a tertiary medical center. One hundred and fifty-seven patients with a history of recurrent IVF failures underwent hysteroscopy between May 2009 and March 2012. Hysteroscopy (diagnostic or operative, as appropriate) was performed to evaluate the endometrial cavity in patients with two or more IVF failures and Incidence of abnormal hysteroscopic findings and the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) in subsequent IVF cycles were assessed.


In all, 44.9 % of the patients included in this study had abnormal hysteroscopic findings and 75 women (48.1 %) became pregnant following hysteroscopy. Of these pregnancies, 36 occurred in women with corrected endometrial pathology, the majority of which was identified as endometrial polyps. Implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate were statistically significant increased after polipectomy.


Abnormal findings on hysteroscopy are significantly higher in patients with previous ART failure and hysteroscopy could be seen as a positive prognostic factor for achieving pregnancy in subsequent IVF procedure in women with a history of RIF.


Recurrent IVF failure Hysteroscopy Infertility 


Conflict of interest



  1. 1.
    Margalioth EJ, Ben-Chetrit A, Gal M, Eldar-Geva T (2006) Investigation and treatment of repeated implantation failure following IVF–ET. Hum Reprod 21:3036–3043PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alex S, Neri L (2012) Repeated implantation failure: clinical approach fertility and sterility, vol 97, No. 5Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fatemi HM, Kasius JC, Timmermans A, van Disseldorp J, Fauser BC, Devroey P et al (2010) Prevalence of unsuspected uterine cavity abnormalities diagnosed by office hysteroscopy prior to in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 25:1959–1965PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Levi Setti PE, Colombo GV, Savasi V, Bulletti C, Albani E, Ferrazzi E (2004) Implantation failure in assisted reproduction technology and a critical approach to treatment. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1034:184–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rai R, Regan L (2006) Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet 368(9535):601–611PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bohlmann MK, von Wolff M, Luedders DW, Beuter-Winkler P, Diedrich K, Hornemann A, Strowitzki T (2010) Hysteroscopic findings in women with two and with more than two first-trimester miscarriages are not significantly different original research article. Reprod Biomed Online 21(2):230–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bozdag G, Aksan G, Esinler I, Yarali H (2008) What is the role of office hysteroscopy in women with failed IVF cycles? Reprod Biomed Online 17:410–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Soares SR, Barbosa dos Reis MM, Camargos AF (2000) Diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography, transvaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography in patients with uterine cavity diseases. Fertil Steril 73:406–411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Crosignani PG, Rubin BL (2000) Optimal use of infertility diagnostic tests and treatments. The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Hum Reprod 15:723–732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Golan A, Eilat E, Ron-El R, Herman A, Soffer Y, Bukovsky I (1996) Hysteroscopy is superior to hysterosalpingography in infertility investigation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 75(7):654–656PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bosteels J, Weyers S, Puttemans P, Panayotidis C, Van Herendael B, Gomel V et al (2010) The effectiveness of hysteroscopy in improving pregnancy rates in subfertile women without other gynaecological symptoms: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 16:1–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bettocchi S, Ceci O, Nappi L, Di Venere R, Masciopinto V, Pansini V et al (2004) Operative office hysteroscopy without anesthesia: analysis of 4,863 cases performed with mechanical instruments. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11:59–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Siristatidis C, Chrelias C, Salamalekis G, Kassanos D (2010) Office hysteroscopy: current trends and potential applications: a critical review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 282:383–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rama Raju GA, Shashi Kumari G, Krishna KM, Prakash GJ, Madan K (2006) Assessment of uterine cavity by hysteroscopy in assisted reproduction programme and its influence on pregnancy outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 274:160–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gaglione R, Valentini AL, Pistilli E, Nuzzi NP (1996) A comparison of hysteroscopy and hysterosalpingography. Int J Gynecol Obstet 52:151–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    (2004) National institute for clinical excellence guidelines tools to optimize the IVF–ET procedure and its cost effectiveness, RCOG Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Oliveria FG, Abdelmasih VG, Diamond MP, Dozortezef D, Nagy ZP, Abdelmassih R (2003) Uterine cavity findings and hysteroscopy interventions in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer who repeatedly cannot conceive. Fertil Steril 80:1371–1375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Taylor E, Gomel V (2008) The uterus and fertility. Fertil Steril 89(1):1–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hossam ES, Mahmoud E, Mostafa K (2012) Eissa routine office hysteroscopy prior to ICSI and its impact on assisted reproduction program outcome: a randomized controlled trial. Middle East Fertil Soc J 17:14–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fatma A (2010) Hysteroscopy in women with implantation failures after in vitro fertilization: findings and effect on subsequent pregnancy rates. Middle East Fertil Soc J 15:288–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    El-Toukhy T, Sunkara SK, Coomarasamy A, Grace J, Khalaf Y (2008) Outpatient hysteroscopy and subsequent IVF cycle outcome: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Reprod Biomed Online 16:712–719PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pinar Cenksoy
    • 1
  • Cem Ficicioglu
    • 1
  • Gazi Yıldırım
    • 1
  • Mert Yesiladali
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of MedicineYeditepe UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations