Cesarean section rate differences by migration indicators
- 496 Downloads
To answer the question: are there differences in cesarean section rates among childbearing women in Canada according to selected migration indicators?
Secondary analyses of 3,500 low-risk women who had given birth between January 2003 and April 2004 in one of ten hospitals in the major Canadian migrant-receiving cities (Montreal, Toronto, Vancouver) were conducted. Women were categorized as non-refugee immigrant, asylum seeker, refugee, or Canadian-born and by source country world region. Stratified analyses were performed.
Cesarean section rates differed by migration status for women from two source regions: South East and Central Asia (non-refugee immigrants 26.0 %, asylum seekers 28.6 %, refugees 56.7 %, p = 0.001) and Latin America (non-refugee immigrants 37.7 %, asylum seekers 25.6 %, refugees 10.5 %, p = 0.05). Of these, low-risk refugee women who had migrated to Canada from South East and Central Asia experienced excess cesarean sections, while refugees from Latin America experienced fewer, compared to Canadian-born (25.4 %, 95 % CI 23.8–27.3). Cesarean section rates of African women were consistently high (31–33 %) irrespective of their migration status but were not statistically different from Canadian-born women. Although it did not reach statistical significance, risk for cesarean sections also differed by time since migration (≤2 years 29.8 %, >2 years 47.2 %).
Migration status, source region, and time since migration are informative migration indicators for cesarean section risk.
KeywordsCesarean section Emigration and immigration Women Postpartum health care needs
The NORMAPERS study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Services and Policy Research and of Gender and Health Research (CIHR # 95355), le Réseau de recherche en santé des populations, and Immigration et métropoles. We would also like to acknowledge Drs. Geoffrey Dougherty, Robert W. Platt, and Jacqueline Oxman-Martinez with their assistance in the conception, design, and implementation of the NORMAPERS study.
Conflict of interest
We declare that we have no conflict of interest. We do not have a financial relationship with the organization that sponsored the research and we have had full control of all primary data and agree to allow the Journal to review this data if requested.
- 2.World Health Organization (2010) Health of migrants—the way forward: report of a global consultation, Madrid, Spain, 3–5 March 2010. World Health Organization Press, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 3.Beiser M, Stewart M (2005) Reducing health disparities: a priority for Canada. Can J Public Health 96(Suppl 2):S4–S5Google Scholar
- 9.Essen B, Bodker B, Sjoberg NO, Langhoff-Roos J, Greisen G, Gudmundsson S, Ostergren PO (2002) Are some perinatal deaths in immigrant groups linked to suboptimal perinatal care services? BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 109(6):677–682Google Scholar
- 18.Ismail KI, Marchocki Z, Brennan DJ, O’Donoghue K (2011) Intrapartum caesarean rates differ significantly between ethnic groups–relationship to induction. European J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 158(2):214–219Google Scholar
- 19.St-Cyr I, Gagnon AJ, Blondel B, Glazier R, Ng E, Small R, Stewart D, Stray-Pedersen B, Zimbeck M (2008) Migration and cesarean birth [poster] CPHA 2008 annual conference, Halifax, NS. http://resources.cpha.ca/CPHA/Conf/Code/PresentationsAbstract.php?r=0&Year=2008&ID=A08-278&l=E. Accessed 1 Nov 2012
- 23.Gagnon AJ, Dougherty G, Platt RW, Wahoush O, George A, Stanger E, Oxman-Martinez J, Saucier JF, Merry L, Stewart DE (2007) Refugee and refugee-claimant women and infants post-birth: migration histories as a predictor of Canadian health system response to needs. Can J Public Health 98(4):287–291PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) (2007) Convention and protocol relating to the status of refugees. UNHCR, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 25.United Nations Statistics Division (2010) Composition of macro geographical (continental) regions, geographical sub-regions, and selected economic and other groupings. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49regin.htm. Accessed September 2012
- 32.Gayral-Taminh M, Arnaud C, Parant O, Fournie A, Reme JM, Grandjean H (1999) Pregnancy and labor of women born in Maghreb and Black Africa followed to delivery at the maternity hospital of Toulouse. (French). J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 28(5):462–471Google Scholar
- 35.Citizenship and Immigration Canada (2008) Application for permanent residence: Federal skilled worker class (IMM 7000). http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/information/applications/guides/EG7TOC.asp. Accessed September 2012
- 36.Canadian Institute for Health Information (2006) Health indicators 2006. Canadian Institute for Health Information, Statistics CanadaGoogle Scholar
- 37.Migrant Friendly Hospitals (2004) The Amsterdam declaration: towards migrant friendly hospitals in an ethno-culturally diverse Europe. Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for the Sociology of Health and Medicine, WHO Collaborating Centre for Health Promotion in Hospitals and Health Care, Vienna Google Scholar
- 38.US Department of Health and Human Services- Office of Minority Health (2001) National standards for culturally and linguistically appropriate services (CLAS) in health care. IQ Solutions, Inc., Washington DCGoogle Scholar