Advertisement

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 287, Issue 3, pp 441–446 | Cite as

Long-term quality of life and patient satisfaction following anterior vaginal mesh repair for cystocele

  • Mohamed Hefni
  • John A. Barry
  • Ourania Koukoura
  • Julie Meredith
  • Mohamed Mossa
  • Simon Edmonds
General Gynecology

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between long term quality of life (QoL), patient satisfaction, and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ) scores following anterior vaginal repair with mesh.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 127 patients who underwent anterior pelvic floor repair with mesh and were assessed 1.03–2.69 years post surgery. One hundred and four women completed the King’s Health Questionnaire (KHQ), the Sheffield Prolapse Symptoms Questionnaire, the EurolQoL EQ-5D, and the Patient Satisfaction Index. POPQ scores were recorded for up to 1 year.

Results

Patients reported good current QoL and high patient satisfaction. POPQ Aa and Ba scores showed significant improvements from a pre-surgery median of +1 to a median of −3 at 12-month follow-up (P < .001). Patient satisfaction was inversely correlated with Aa scores at 12 months (r s = −.360, n = 49, P < .011). There were high QoL scores at an average 2 years after anterior compartment mesh repair.

Conclusions

QoL outcomes were good. There was a significant relationship between Aa scores and patient satisfaction, suggesting that this outcome is a key to patient satisfaction.

Keywords

Anterior compartment Cystocele Patient satisfaction Quality of life Surgical mesh 

Notes

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN (2010) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 21:5–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hiltunen R, Nieminen K, Takala T, Heiskanen E, Merikari M, Niemi K et al (2007) Low-weight polypropylene mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 110:455–462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nguyen JN, Burchette RJ (2008) Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 111:891–898PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sand PK, Koduri S, Lobel RW, Winkler HA, Tomezsko J, Culligan PJ, Goldberg R (2001) Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:1357–1362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR, Ballard LA (2001) Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1299–1304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Adams EJ, Hagen S, Glazener CM (2010) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004014PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Altman D, Väyrynen T, Ellström Engh M, Axelsen S, Falconer C (2011) Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse. New Engl J Med 364:1826–1836PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vollebregt A, Fischer K, Gietelink D, van der Vaart CH (2011) Primary surgical repair of anterior vaginal prolapse: a randomised trial comparing anatomical and functional outcome between anterior colporrhaphy and trocar-guided transobturator anterior mesh. BJOG 118:1518–1527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fatton B, Amblard J, Debodinance P, Cosson M, Jacquetin B (2007) Transvaginal repair of genital prolapse: preliminary results of a new tension-free vaginal mesh (Prolift technique)—a case series multicentric study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:743–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Elmér C, Altman D, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Vayrynen T, Falconer C (2009) Trocar-guided transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 113:117–126PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abdel-Fattah M, Ramsay I (2008) Retrospective multicentre study of the new minimally invasive mesh repair devices for pelvic organ prolapse. BJOG 115:22–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Feiner B, Jelovsek JE, Maher C (2009) Efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh kits in the treatment of prolapse of the vaginal apex: a systematic review. BJOG 116:15–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rogers R (2011) To Mesh or Not to Mesh: current Debates in Prolapse Repair Fueled by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Safety Notification. Obstet Gynecol 118:771–773PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    The EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16:199–208Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bradshaw HD, Hiller L, Farkas AG, Radley S, Radley SC (2006) Development and psychometric testing of a symptom index for pelvic organ prolapse. J Obstet Gynaecol 26:241–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kelleher CJ, Cardozo LD, Khullar V, Salvatore S (1997) A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:1374–1379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Digesu GA, Salvatore S, Chaliha C, Athanasiou S, Milani R, Khullar V (2007) Do overactive bladder symptoms improve after repair of anterior vaginal wall prolapse? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:1439–1443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moore RD, Beyer RD, Jacoby K, Freedman SJ, McCammon KA, Gambla MT (2010) Prospective multicenter trial assessing type I, polypropylene mesh placed via transobturator route for the treatment of anterior vaginal prolapse with 2-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21:545–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    de Tayrac R, Devoldere G, Renaudie J, Villard P, Guilbaud O, Eglin G, French Ugytex Study Group (2007) Prolapse repair by vaginal route using a new protected low-weight polypropylene mesh: 1-year functional and anatomical outcome in a prospective multicentre study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:251–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Carey M, Higgs P, Goh J, Lim J, Leong A, Krause H et al (2009) Vaginal repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy for prolapse: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 116:1380–1386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Culligan PJ, Littman PM, Salamon CG, Priestley JL, Shariati A (2010) Evaluation of a transvaginal mesh delivery system for the correction of pelvic organ prolapse: subjective and objective findings at least 1 year after surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203:506.e1–506.e6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ternent L, Vale L, Buckley B, Glazener C (2009) Measuring outcomes of importance to women with stress urinary incontinence. BJOG 116:719–725PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohamed Hefni
    • 1
  • John A. Barry
    • 2
  • Ourania Koukoura
    • 3
  • Julie Meredith
    • 1
  • Mohamed Mossa
    • 1
  • Simon Edmonds
    • 1
  1. 1.Gynaecology DepartmentBenenden HospitalBenendenUK
  2. 2.Institute for Women’s HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Obstetrics and Gynaecology DepartmentUniversity Hospital of LarissaLarissaGreece

Personalised recommendations