References
Katz V, Balderston K, DeFreest M (2005) Perimortem cesarean delivery: were our assumptions correct? Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1916–1920
Vanden Hoek TL, Morrison LJ, Shuster M et al (2010) Part 12: cardiac arrest in special situations: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 122(18 Suppl 3):S829–S861
Hui D, Morrison LJ, Windrim R et al (2011) The American Heart Association 2010 guidelines for the management of cardiac arrest in pregnancy: consensus recommendations on implementation strategies. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 33:858–863
Oi H, Naruse K, Noguchi T et al (2010) Fatal factors of clinical manifestations and laboratory testing in patients with amniotic fluid embolism. Gynecol Obstet Invest 70:138–144
Matsubara S, Yano H, Taneichi A, Suzuki M (2009) Uterine compression suture against impending recurrence of uterine inversion immediately after laparotomy repositioning. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 35:819–823
Matsubara S, Sato T, Nakata M (2011) Vaginal artery embolization with a permanent embolic agent for intractable postpartum hemorrhage. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 37:377–378
Matsubara S, Kuwata T, Usui R (2011) Forceps holding the cervix for postpartum haemorrhage. J Obstet Gynaecol 31:509
Vencken PM, van Hooff MH, van der Weiden RM (2010) Cardiac arrest in pregnancy: increasing use of perimortem caesarean section due to emergency skills training? BJOG 117:1664–1665
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matsubara, S., Usui, R., Watanabe, T. et al. Perimortem cesarean section or perimortem cesarean supracervical hysterectomy?. Arch Gynecol Obstet 287, 389–390 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2513-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2513-1