Advertisement

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 287, Issue 1, pp 25–29 | Cite as

Single square hemostatic suture for postpartum hemorrhage secondary to uterine atony

  • Ozgur Akbayir
  • Aytul Corbacioglu Esmer
  • Pınar Cilesiz Goksedef
  • Ali Ekiz
  • Aysu Akca
  • Birgul Guraslan
  • Gokce Akagunduz
Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study is to describe a novel technique for the treatment of postpartum hemorrhage and evaluate its effectiveness and safety.

Methods

Single square hemostatic suture was performed for uterine atony when postpartum hemorrhage did not respond to medical therapy and bilateral uterine artery ligation. We retrospectively reviewed the data of 11 women and evaluated their endometrial cavity with hydrosonography after a follow-up period of 8–34 months.

Results

The single square hemostatic suture successfully stopped bleeding in all of the cases. Of the 11 women, 2 could not be traced. Menstruation started without delay in nine women. One of the women achieved pregnancy 25 months after surgery. The six women who underwent hydrosonography had an intact endometrial cavity.

Conclusions

For women who desire future fertility, and when bilateral uterine artery ligation is not sufficient to control PPH, single square suturing may be used as an effective and safe procedure.

Keywords

Postpartum hemorrhage Atony Single square suture Hemostatic suture Uterine compression suture 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Yavuz Ceylan for his valuable contribution to diagrams.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Pahlavan P, Nezhat C (2001) Hemorrhage in obstetrics and gynecology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 13:419–424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Doumouchtsis SK, Papegeorghiou AT, Arulkumaran S (2007) Systematic review of conservative management of postpartum hemorrhage: what to do when medical treatment fails. Obstet Gynecol Surv 62(8):540–547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    B-Lynch C, Coker A, Lawal AH, Abu J, Cowen MJ (1997) The B-Lynch surgical technique for the control of massive postpartum haemorrhage:an alternative to hysterectomy? Five cases reported. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:372–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saman Kumara YVAL, Marasinghe JP, Condous G, Marasinghe U (2009) Pregnancy complicated by a uterine fundal defect resulting from a previous B-Lynch suture. BJOG 116:1815–1817PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu HH, Yeh GP (2005) Uterine cavity synechiae after hemostatic square suturing technique. Obstet Gynecol 105(5 Pt 2):1176–1178Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ochoa M, Allaire A, Stitely M (2002) Pyometria after hemostatic square suture technique. Obstet Gynecol 99:506–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sentilhes L, Gromez A, Trichot C, Richbourg-Schneider A, Descamps P, Marpeau L (2009) Fertility after B-Lynch suture and stepwise uterine devascularization. Fertil Steril 91(3):934e5–934e9Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen CP (2001) Use of the hemostatic multiple square suturing of the uterus for control of massive postcesarean section hemorrhage and preservation of fertility. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:976PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Senthilles L, Marpeau L (2010) Has B-Lynch suture hidden long-term effects? Fertil Steril 94(4):e62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Senthiles L, Trichot C, Resch B, Sergent F, Marpeau L, Verspyck E (2008) Fertility and pregnancy outcomes following uterine devascularization for postpartum hemnorrhage. Hum Reprod 23:92–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    O’Leary JA (1995) Uterine artery ligation in the control of postcesarean hemorrhage. J Reprod Med 40:189–193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Allam MS, B-Lynch C (2005) The B-Lynch and other uterine compression suture techniques. Int J Gynecol Obstet 89:236–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reyftmann L, Nguyen A, Ristic V, Rouleau Ci Mazet N, Dechaud H (2009) Partial uterine wall necrosis following Cho hemostatic sutures for the treatment of postpartum hemorrhage. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 37(6):82–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Akoury H, Sherman C (2008) Uterine wall partial thickness necrosis following combined B-Lynch and Cho square sutures for the treatment of primary postpartum hemorrhage. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 30(5):421–424PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pereira A, Nunes F, Pedroso S, Saraiva J, Retto H, Meirinho M (2005) Compressive uterine compression sutures to treat postpartum bleeding secondary to uterine atony. Obstet Gynecol 106(3):569–572PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zheng J, Xiong X, Ma Q, Zhang X, Li M (2011) A new uterine compression suture for postpartum hemorrhage with atony. BJOG 118:370–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hayman RG, Arulkumaran S, Steer PJ (2002) Uterine compression sutures: surgical management of postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 99:502–506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bhal K, Bhal N, Mulik V, Shankar L (2005) The uterine compression suture-a valuable approach to control major haemorrhage at lower segment cesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol 25(1):10–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marasinghe JP, Condous G (2009) Uterine compression sutures for postparum bleeding with atony; modification of the B-Lynch suture. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 49:67–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cho JH, Jun HS, Lee CN (2000) Hemostatic suturing technique for uterine bleeding during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 96(1):129–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hacketbal A, Breuggmann D, Oehmke F, Tinneberg HR, Zygmunt MT, Muenstedt K (2008) Uterine compression U-sutures in primary postpartum hemorrhage after Cesarean section: fertility preservation with a simple and effective technique. Hum Reprod 23(1):74–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ouahba J, Piketty M, Huel C, Azarian M, Feraud O, Luton D, Sibony O, Oury JF (2007) Uterine compression sutures for postpartum bleeding with atony. BJOG 114(5):619–622PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Matsubara S, Yano H, Taneichi A, Suzuki M (2009) Uterine compression suture against impending recurrence of uterine inversion immediately after laparotomy repositioning. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 35(4):819–823PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nelson WL, O’Brien JM (2007) The uterine sandwich for persistent uterine atony: combining the B-Lynch compression suture and an intrauterine Bakri balloon. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196(5):e9–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ozgur Akbayir
    • 1
  • Aytul Corbacioglu Esmer
    • 2
  • Pınar Cilesiz Goksedef
    • 3
  • Ali Ekiz
    • 1
  • Aysu Akca
    • 1
  • Birgul Guraslan
    • 1
  • Gokce Akagunduz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyKanuni Sultan Suleyman Research and Teaching HospitalIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul Faculty of MedicineIstanbul UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyHaseki Research and Teaching HospitalIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations