Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 285, Issue 6, pp 1517–1521 | Cite as

Outcomes of pregnancies complicated by hyperemesis gravidarum

  • Oguzhan Kuru
  • Serhat Sen
  • Ozgur Akbayır
  • B. Pinar Cilesiz Goksedef
  • Mehmet Özsürmeli
  • Erkut Attar
  • Halil Saygılı
Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate maternal and fetal outcomes among women with hyperemesis gravidarum (HG).

Methods

In a university hospital and a research and training hospital, a retrospective cohort study was conducted among women with singleton deliveries between 2003 and 2011. Maternal outcomes evaluated included gestational diabetes, pregnancy-induced hypertension, cesarean delivery. Neonatal outcomes also determined were 5-min Apgar score of less than 7, low birth weight, small for gestational age (SGA), preterm delivery, fetal sex, and stillbirth.

Results

There were no statistical differences in the mean of age, parity, the number of artificial pregnancy, and smoking between two groups. Infants from HG pregnancies manifested similar birth weight (3,121.5 ± 595.4 vs. 3,164 ± 664.5 g) and gestational age (38.1 ± 2.3 vs. 38.1 ± 2.6 weeks), relative to infants from the control group (p = 0.67 and 0.91, respectively). In addition, no statistical significant differences were found in the rates of SGA birth, preterm birth, gestational diabetes, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and adverse fetal outcome between two groups (p > 0.05). Cesarean delivery rates were similar in two groups (31.9% in hyperemesis group vs. 27% in control group, p = 0.49). Comparing the gender of the newborn baby and Apgar scores less than 7 at 5 min, there were no statistically significant differences between two groups (p = 0.16 and 0.42, respectively).

Conclusion

Hyperemesis gravidarum is not associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Keywords

Hyperemesis gravidarum Pregnancy Fetal outcome Maternal outcome 

References

  1. 1.
    Arsenault MY, Lane CA et al (2002) The management of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Can 24:817–831Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bailit JL (2005) Hyperemesis gravidarum: epidemiologic findings from a large cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:811–814PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ismail SK, Kenny L (2007) Review on hyperemesis gravidarum. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 21:755–769PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fell DB, Dodds L et al (2006) Risk factors for hyperemesis gravidarum requiring hospital admission during pregnancy. Obstet Gynaecol 107:277–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Verberg MF, Gillott DJ et al (2005) Hyperemesis gravidarum: a literature review. Hum Reprod Update 11(September–October (5)):527–539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eliakim R, Abulafia O, Sherer DM (2000) Hyperemesis gravidarum: a current review. Am J Perinatol 17:207–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hod M, Orvieto R et al (1994) Hyperemesis gravidarum: a review. J Reprod Med 39:605–612PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brandes JM (1967) First-trimester nausea and vomiting as related to outcome of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 30:427–431PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fierson FD, Olsen CL, Hook EB (1986) Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy and association with pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 155:1017–1022Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hallak M, Tsalamandris K et al (1996) Hyperemesis gravidarum: effects on fetal outcome. J Repr Med 41:871–874Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Godsey RK, Newman RB (1991) Hyperemesis gravidarum: a comparison of single and multiple admissions. J Reprod Med 36:287–290PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vilming B, Nesheim BI (2000) Hyperemesis gravidarum in a contemporary population in Oslo. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79:640–643PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    ADA (2006) Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care 29(Suppl 1):S7Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kallen B (1987) Hyperemesis during pregnancy and delivery outcome: a registry study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 26:291–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bailit JL (2005) Hyperemesis gravidarum: epidemiologic findings from a large cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(3):811–814PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Veenendaal MV, van Abeelen AF et al (2011) Consequences of hyperemesis gravidarum for offspring: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 118(11):1302–1313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bashiri A, Neumann I et al (1995) Hyperemesis gravidarum: epidemiologic features, complications and outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 63:135–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gross S, Librach C, Cecutti A (1989) Maternal weight loss associated with hyperemesis gravidarum: a predictor of fetal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 160:906–909PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roseboom TJ, Ravelli AC et al (2011) Maternal characteristics largely explain poor pregnancy outcome after hyperemesis gravidarum. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 156(1):56–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dodds L, Fell DB et al (2006) Outcomes of pregnancies complicated by hyperemesis gravidarum. Obstet Gynecol 107(2 Part 1):285–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tan PC, Jacob R et al (2007) Pregnancy outcome in hyperemesis gravidarum and the effect of laboratory clinical indicators of hyperemesis severity. J Obstet Gynecol Res 33(4):457–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sorensen HT, Thulstrup AM, Mortensen JT (2000) Hyperemesis gravidarum and sex of child. Lancet 355:407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Basso O, Olsen J (2001) Sex ratio and twinning in women with hyperemesis or pre-eclampsia. Epidemiology 12:747–749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vikanes A, Grjibovski AM, Vangen S, Magnus P (2008) Variations in prevalence of hyperemesis gravidarum by country of birth: a study of 900074 pregnancies in Norway, 1967–2005. Scand J Public Health 36:135–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Depue RH, Bernstein L et al (1987) Hyperemesis gravidarum in relation to estradiol levels, pregnancy outcome, and other maternal factors: a seroepidemiologic study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156:1137–1141Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oguzhan Kuru
    • 1
  • Serhat Sen
    • 2
  • Ozgur Akbayır
    • 3
  • B. Pinar Cilesiz Goksedef
    • 4
  • Mehmet Özsürmeli
    • 5
  • Erkut Attar
    • 5
  • Halil Saygılı
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyKanuni Sultan Süleyman Research and Training HospitalIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySüleymaniye Research and Training HospitalIstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Research and Training HospitalIstanbulTurkey
  4. 4.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyHaseki Research and Training HospitalIstanbulTurkey
  5. 5.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul Medical FacultyIstanbul UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations