Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 285, Issue 2, pp 515–520 | Cite as

Effects of a clinical pathway 3 years after implementation in breast surgery

  • C. Richter-EhrensteinEmail author
  • S. Heymann
  • A. Schneider
  • O. Vargas Hein
Gynecologic Oncology



The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effects of the implementation of clinical pathways into routine practice of breast surgery.

Materials and methods

We implemented a clinical pathway for breast surgery in 2006 and analysed for the following 3 years its path in respect to hospital stay, total costs per case, readmission rate, and patients’ satisfaction.


The mean hospital stay decreased significantly from 4.5 days in 2006 to 3.7 days in 2007 and revealed 3.4 days in 2008. This is a decrease by 24.4% for the duration of hospital stay. The total cost per case between 2006 and 2007 showed a significant decrease of 23.4%. The total costs increased by 13.4% in 2008. Readmission rate was under 5% and remained constant. Patients’ satisfaction remained constant, whereby more than 90% of the expected good results were attained.


There is substantial evidence that clinical pathways lead to various improvements in clinical care in surgery. We show a constantly significant effect on duration of hospital stay without any increase in the number of readmissions. In our view, it is not only an economic benefit which prevails here, but also especially a transparency of treatment which leads to higher compliance, better outcome and a shorter length of stay.


Clinical pathway Breast surgery Quality of care Economic effects Treatment standards 


Conflict of interest



  1. 1.
    Ronellenfitsch U, Rössner E, Jakob J et al (2008) Clinical pathways in surgery—should we introduce them into clinical routine? A review article. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393:449–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Richter-Ehrenstein C, Schneider A, Krämer M et al (2009) Klinischer Behandlungspfad für die Mammachirurgie: Pfadcontrolling und Effekte. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 69:617–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Melbert RB, Kimmins MH, Isler JT et al (2002) Use of a critical pathway for colon resections. J Gastrointest Surg 6(5):745–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pitt HA, Murray KP, Bowman HM et al (1999) Clinical pathways implementation improves outcomes for complex biliary surgery. Surgery 126(4):751–756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Uchijama K, Takifuji K, Tani M et al (2002) Effectiveness of the clinical pathway to decrease length of stay and cost for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16(11):1594–1597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jacavone JB, Daniels RD, Tyner I (1999) CNS facilitation of a cardiac surgery clinical pathway program. Clin Nurs Spec 13(3):126–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blegen MA, Reiter RC, Goode CJ et al (1995) Outcomes of hospital-based managed care: a multivariate analysis of cost and quality. Obstet Gynecol 86(5):809–814PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ferri LE, Feldman LS, Stanbridge DD et al (2006) Patient perception of a clinical pathway for laparoscopic foregut surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 10(6):878–882PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Soria V, Pellicer E, Flores B et al (2005) Evaluation of the clinical pathway for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 71(1):40–45PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Delaney CP, Zutshi M, Senagore AJ et al (2003) Prospective, randomized controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 46(7):851–859PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jones JW, McCullough LB, Richman BW (2003) The ethics of clinical pathways and cost control. J Vasc Surg 37(6):1341–1342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roeder N, Kuttner T (2006) Clinical pathways in view of cost effects in the DRG system. Internist (Berl) 47(7):684–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dy SM, Garg PP, Nyberg D et al (2003) Are critical pathways effective for reducing postoperative length of stay? Med Care 41(5):637–648PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hunter B, Segrott J (2008) Re-mapping client journeys and professional identities: a review of the literature on clinical pathways. Int J Nurs Stud 45(4):608–625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spatzker S (2006) Klinische Behandlungspfade: Ein Instrument zur Qualitätssteigerung im Krankenhaus. Klinikarzt 35(12):503–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stephen AE, Berger DL (2003) Shortened length of stay and hospital cost reduction with implementation of an accelerated clinical care pathway after elective colon resection. Surgery 133(3):277–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Richter-Ehrenstein
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. Heymann
    • 2
  • A. Schneider
    • 1
  • O. Vargas Hein
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Gynecology, Interdisciplinary Breast CenterCharité-University Medicine BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Medicine ControllingCharité-University Medicine BerlinBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Quality ManagementCharité-University Medicine BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations