Advertisement

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 281, Issue 5, pp 927–932 | Cite as

Worldwide first experiences with vacuum-assisted closure as alternative treatment method to repair defects of an extended thoracic wall recurrence of breast cancer

  • Darius Dian
  • Vera Bodungen
  • Isabelle Himsl
  • Visnja Drinovac
  • Ioannes Mylonas
  • Harald Sommer
  • Klaus Friese
Gynecologic Oncology

Abstract

Introduction

Loco-regional recurrences of the breast cancer are associated with a bad prognosis. Often costly autologous-tissue treatment as a surgery aiming at repairing the defects is necessary.

Patients and methods

Four female patients were treated with the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC)-system in context with the recurrence resection. In all cases a primary local masking was not possible.

Results

In the described cases the wounds healed well during the post-operative phase. There occurred no problems either during the radiation treatment or during chemotherapy in the case of lying VAC-Systems.

Conclusion

Using vacuum-assisted wound closure one can avoid autologous-tissue treatment in the case of extensive loco-regional recurrences.

Keywords

Breast Cancer Recurrence Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) 

Notes

Conflict of interest statement

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Hayes D (2008) An overview of treatment for locally advanced, recurrent, and metastatic breast cancer. http:\\www.uptodate.com. Accessed 1 Jan 2008. Ref type: electronic citation
  2. 2.
    Dian D, Straub J, Scholz C et al (2008) Influencing factors for regional lymph node recurrence of breast cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 277(2):127–134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dian D, Herold H, Mylonas I et al (2008) Survival analysis between patients with invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 279:23–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dian D, Schwenn K, Mylonas I, Janni W, Jaenicke F, Friese K (2007) Aesthetic result among breast cancer patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction versus breast conserving therapy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 275(6):445–450CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dian D, Schwenn K, Friese K, Janicke F (2006) Morbidity after mastectomy and immediate autologous reconstruction. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 66(5):469–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dian D, Drinovac V, Mylonas I, Friese K (2009) Worldwide first successful splitting of the breast for a single-procedure reconstruction after mastectomy with maintaining the sensitivity. Arch Gynecol Obstet 280:539–542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dian D (2009) Behandlung des lokalen und regionären Tumorrezidivs. In: Manual Mammakarzinome (ed) Tumorzentrum München. W.Zuckschwerdt Verlag, pp 217–224Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moues CM, Vos MC, van den Bemd GJ, Stijnen T, Hovius SE (2004) Bacterial load in relation to vacuum-assisted closure wound therapy: a prospective randomized trial 3. Wound Repair Regen 12(1):11–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moues CM, van den Bemd GJ, Heule F, Hovius SE (2007) Comparing conventional gauze therapy to vacuum-assisted closure wound therapy: a prospective randomised trial. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 60(6):672–681CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Argenta LC, Morykwas MJ (1997) Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience. Ann Plast Surg 38(6):563–576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC, Shelton-Brown EI, McGuirt W (1997) Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic foundation. Ann Plast Surg 38(6):553–562CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alvarez AA, Maxwell GL, Rodriguez GC (2001) Vacuum-assisted closure for cutaneous gastrointestinal fistula management. Gynecol Oncol 80(3):413–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Flack S, Apelqvist J, Keith M, Trueman P, Williams D (2008) An economic evaluation of VAC therapy compared with wound dressings in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. J Wound Care 17(2):71–78PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Immer FF, Durrer M, Muhlemann KS, Erni D, Gahl B, Carrel TP (2005) Deep sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery: modality of treatment and outcome. Ann Thorac Surg 80(3):957–961CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Polykandriotis E, Kneser U, Kopp J, Horch RE (2006) Modified gloving technique for vacuum therapy in the hand. Zentralbl Chir 131(Suppl 1):S36–S39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vuerstaek JD, Vainas T, Wuite J, Nelemans P, Neumann MH, Veraart JC (2006) State-of-the-art treatment of chronic leg ulcers: a randomized controlled trial comparing vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) with modern wound dressings. J Vasc Surg 44(5):1029–1037CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wondberg D, Larusson HJ, Metzger U, Platz A, Zingg U (2008) Treatment of the open abdomen with the commercially available vacuum-assisted closure system in patients with abdominal sepsis: low primary closure rate. World J Surg 32:2724–2729CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darius Dian
    • 1
    • 2
  • Vera Bodungen
    • 1
  • Isabelle Himsl
    • 1
  • Visnja Drinovac
    • 1
  • Ioannes Mylonas
    • 1
  • Harald Sommer
    • 1
  • Klaus Friese
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyLudwig-Maximillians-University HospitalMunichGermany
  2. 2.Universitätsfrauenklinik MünchenMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations