Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 283, Issue 1, pp 53–58 | Cite as

Effect of umbilical vein blood flow on perinatal outcome of fetuses with lean and/or hypo-coiled umbilical cord

  • Manal M. El behery
  • Amal A. Nouh
  • Amal M. Alanwar
  • Abdalla E. Diab
Materno-fetal Medicine

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the effect of umbilical vein (UV) blood flow measured by color-directed pulsed-wave Doppler on perinatal outcome of fetuses with lean and/or hypocoiled umbilical cord after 24 weeks of gestation.

Methods

Two hundred and forty-four women with singleton fetus after 24 weeks of gestation were studied. Umbilical cord area, umbilical vessel cross-sectional area and antenatal umbilical coiling index (UCI) were calculated and compared with Doppler parameters including UV blood flow volume in ml/min/kg, UV peak systolic velocity in cm/s, and umbilical artery pulsatility index.

Results

Thirty-eight (15.5%) fetuses had lean umbilical cord (area < 10th percentile). A significant difference between fetuses with and those without lean cord was found in terms of: UCI (0.17 ± 0.06 vs. 0.35 ± 0.08, P < 0.001), cord cross-sectional area (89.6 ± 11.7 vs. 198.7 ± 33.7 mm2, P < 0.001), Wharton’s jelly amount (36.5 ± 11.2 vs. 125.2 ± 34.1 mm2, P < 0.001), UV blood flow (83.4 ± 15.8 vs. 131.0 ± 19.8 ml/min/kg, P < 0.001), and UV blood flow mean velocity (8.6 ± 3.7 vs. 12.1 ± 2.8 cm/s, P < 0.05). A significant positive correlation was found between antenatal UCI and UV blood flow (r = 0.73, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Fetuses with lean and/or hypo-coiled umbilical cord showed a noticeable decrease in UV blood flow of sufficient magnitude that could affect fetal growth, and this could explain the higher prevalence of fetal intrapartum complications in growth-restricted fetuses.

Keywords

Lean umbilical cord Umbilical vein Blood flow Perinatal outcome 

References

  1. 1.
    Di Nero E, Chezzi F, Raio L, Franchi M, D’addrio V (2001) Umbilical cord morphology and pregnancy outcome. Eur J Obstet Gnecol Reprod Biol 69:150–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bruch JF, Sibony O, Benali K, Challer C, Blot P, Nessmann C (1997) Computerized microscope morphometry of umbilical vessels from pregnancies with intrauterine growth retardation and abnormal umbilical artery Doppler. Hum Pathol 28:1139–1145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Delaat M, Franx A, Nickkels PGD, Visser GHA (2006) Prenatal ultrasonographic prediction of the umbilical coiling index at birth and adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obestet Gynecol 28:704–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Galan HL, Jozwik M, Rigano S, Regnault TR, Hobbins JC, Battaglia FC, Ferrazzi E (1999) Umbilical vein blood flow determination in the ovine fetus: comparison of Doppler ultrasonographic and steady-state diffusion techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:1149–1153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rigano S, Bozzo M, Ferrazzi E, Bellotti M, Battaglia FC, Galan HL (2001) Early and persistent reduction in umbilical vein blood flow in the growth-restricted fetus: a longitudinal study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:834–838CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Strong TH, Finberg HJ, Mattox JH (1994) Antepartum diagnosis of noncoiled umbilical cords. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:1729–1733PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E et al (1999) Prenatal diagnosis of a “lean” umbilical cord: a simple marker for fetuses at risk of being small for gestational age at birth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 13:176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barbieri C, Cecatti JG, Souza CE, Marussi EF, Costa JV (2008) Inter- and intra-observer variability in sonographic measurements of the cross-sectional diameters and area of the umbilical cord and its vessels during pregnancy. Reprod Health 5:5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sebire NJ (2007) Patho-physiological significance of abnormal umbilical cord coiling index. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30(6):804–806CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kiserud T, Eik-Nes H, Blaas HG, Hellevik LR, Simensen B (1994) Ductus venosus blood velocity and the umbilical circulation in seriously growth retarded fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 4:109–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barbera A, Galan HL, Ferrazzi E, Rigano S, Jozwik M, Battaglia FC, Pardi G (1999) Relationship of umbilical vein blood flow to growth parameters in the human fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:174–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Di Naro E, Ghezzi F, Raio L et al (2001) Umbilical vein blood flow in fetuses with normal and lean umbilical cord. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 17:224CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Di Naro E, Raio L, Ghezzi F et al (2002) Longitudinal changes of the umbilical vein blood flow in normal and growth retarded fetuses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81:527PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Silver RK, Dooley SL, Tamura RK (2001) Umbilical cord size and amniotic fluid volume in prolonged pregnancy. Am J Obestet Gynecol 18:348Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Labarrere C, Sebastiani M, Siminovich E (1985) Absence of Wharton’s jelly around the umbilical arteries: an unusual cause of perinatal mortality. Placenta 6:555CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Malpas P, Symonds EM (1966) Observations on the structure of the human umbilical cord. Surg Gynecol Obstet 123:746–750PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ghezzi F, Raio L, Dinero E, Franchi M, Balestreri D, D’addario V (2001) Nomogram of Wharton’s jelly as depicted in the sonographic cross section of the umbilical cord. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:121–125CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Otsubo Y, Yoneyama Y, Suzuki S, Sawa R, Araki T (1999) Sonographic evaluation of umbilical cord insertion with umbilical coiling index. J Clin Ultrasound 27(6):340–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Georgiou HM, Rice GE, Walker SP, Wein P, Gude NM, Permezel M (2001) The effect of vascular coiling on venous perfusion during experimental umbilical cord encirclement. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:673–678CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Degani S, Lewingsky RM, Berger H, Spiegel D (1995) Sonographic estimation of umbilical coiling index and correlation with Doppler flow characteristics. Obstet Gynecol 86:990–993CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Predanic M, Perni SC, Chervenak FA (2006) Antenatal umbilical coiling index and Doppler flow characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28(5):699–703CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reynolds SRM (1978) Mechanisms of placento fetal blood flow. Obstet Gynecol 51:245–249PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manal M. El behery
    • 1
  • Amal A. Nouh
    • 1
  • Amal M. Alanwar
    • 1
  • Abdalla E. Diab
    • 1
  1. 1.Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of MedicineZagazig UniversityZagazigEgypt

Personalised recommendations