Advertisement

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 279, Issue 5, pp 649–654 | Cite as

A criterion based audit of the management of obstructed labour in Malawi

  • Eugene Justine Kongnyuy
  • Grace Mlava
  • Nynke van den Broek
Original Article

Abstract

Objective

To assess and improve the management of obstructed labour in maternity units in Malawi.

Methods

A criterion based audit of the management of obstructed labour was conducted in 8 hospitals in three districts in Malawi. Management practices were: (a) assessed by a retrospective review of 44 cases notes, and (b) compared with local standards established, by a multidisciplinary team, based on the Malawi Ministry of Health guidelines and World Health Organisation manuals. Gaps in current practice were identified, reasons discussed, and recommendations made and implemented. A re-audit (41 case notes) was conducted 3 months later.

Results

There were significant improvements in the attainment of four standards: draining of urinary bladder (70.5 vs. 90.2%; P = 0.022), administration of broad spectrum antibiotics (72.7 vs. 90.2%; P = 0.039), commencement of Caesarean section within 1 hour or delivery of the foetus within 2 h of diagnosis (38.6 vs. 61.0%; P = 0.023), and maintaining an observation chart (45.5 vs. 61.0%; P < 0.001). However, there was no significant change in two standards: securing an intravenous line and hydrating the patient (95.5 vs. 97.6%; P = 0.804), and typing and cross-match of blood (77.3 vs. 63.4%; P = 0.197). There was a reduction in case fatality rate (9.1 vs. 2.4%; P = 0.361) and perinatal mortality (18.8 vs. 12.2%, P = 0.462).

Conclusion

Criterion based audit can improve the management of obstructed labour in countries with limited resources.

Keywords

Obstructed labour Caesarean section Criterion based audit Standards Malawi 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the Health Foundation for providing funding for this study.

Conflict of interest statement

There is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Dolea C, Abouzahr C (2003) Global burden of obstructed labour in the year 2000. Department of Evidence and Information for Policy, World Health Organisation, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    van Beekhuizen HJ, Unkels R, Mmuni NS, Kaiser M (2006) Complications of obstructed labour: pressure necrosis of neonatal scalp and vesicovaginal fistula. Lancet 368:1210. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69477-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chhabra S, Gandhi D, Jaiswal M (2000) Obstructed labour––a preventable entity. J Obstet Gynaecol 20:151–153. doi: 10.1080/01443610062913 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weiner R, Ronsmans C, Dorman E, Jilo H, Muhoro A, Shulman C (2003) Labour complications remain the most important risk factors for perinatal mortality in rural Kenya. Bull World Health Organ 81:561–566PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Melah GS, El-Nafaty AU, Massa AA, Audu BM (2003) Obstructed labour: a public health problem in Gombe, Gombe State, Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol 23:369–373. doi: 10.1080/01443610310001119510 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Melah GS, Massa AA, Yahaya UR, Bukar M, Kizaya DD, El-Nafaty AU (2007) Risk factors for obstetric fistulae in north-eastern Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol 27:819–823. doi: 10.1080/01443610701709825 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ould El Joud D, Bouvier-Colle MH, Groupe MOMA (2002) Dystocia: frequency and risk factors in seven areas in West Africa. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 31:51–62Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fenton PM, Whitty CJ, Reynolds F (2003) Caesarean section in Malawi: prospective study of early maternal and perinatal mortality. BMJ 327:587. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7415.587 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Malawi National Statistical Office, Macro ORC (2005) 2004 Malawi Demographic and Health Survey. Calverton, USA, ORC Macro, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johnson K (2007) Incontinence in Malawi: analysis of a proxy measure of vaginal fistula in a national survey. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 99(Suppl 1):S122–S129. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.06.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lema VM, Changole J, Kanyighe C, Malunga EV (2005) Maternal mortality at the Queen Elizabeth Central Teaching Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi. East Afr Med J 82:3–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ratsma YE (2001) Why more mothers die: confidential enquiry into institutional maternal deaths in the Southern region of Malawi. National Safe Motherhood Project, Blantyre, MalawiGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kongnyuy EJ, Hofman J, Mlava G, Mhango C, van den Broek N (2008) Availability, utilisation and quality of basic and comprehensive emergency obstetric care Services in Malawi. Matern Child Health J (Epub ahead of print)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    World Health Organisation (2004) Beyond the numbers: reviewing maternal deaths and complications to make pregnancy safer. Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organisation, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Malawi Ministry of Health and Population JHPIEGO (2001) Malawi national reproductive health services delivery guidelines. Malawi Ministry of Health and Population, LilongweGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    World Health Organisation (2005) Integrated management of pregnancy and childbirth series (IMPAC). Geneva. http://www.euro.who.int/pregnancy/esscare/20051103_3?language=german (retrieved April 20, 2007)
  17. 17.
    Kongnyuy EJ, Mlava G, van den Broek N (2008) Establishing standards for obstructed labour in a low-income country. Rural Remote Health 8(3):1022PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kongnyuy EJ, van den Broek N (2008) Criteria for clinical audit of women friendly care and providers’ perception in Malawi. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 8:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-8-28 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weeks AD, Alia G, Ononge S, Mutungi A, Otolorin EO, Mirembe FM (2003) Introducing criteria based audit into Ugandan maternity units. BMJ 327:1329–1331. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7427.1329 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Graham W, Wagaarachchi P, Penney G, McCaw-Binns A, Antwi KY, Hall MH (2000) Criteria for clinical audit of the quality of hospital-based obstetric care in developing countries. Bull World Health Organ 78:614–620PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wagaarachchi PT, Graham WJ, Penney GC, McCaw-Binns A, Yeboah Antwi K, Hall MH (2001) Holding up a mirror: changing obstetric practice through criterion-based clinical audit in developing countries. Int Gynecol Obstet 74:119–130. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00427-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mackey MC (1991) Strategies for change: nursing implementation of the birthing room. J Perinatol 11:262–267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Grady K (2007) RCOG international office educational initiatives. RCOG Int Newsl 1:22–26Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mbaruku G, Bergström S (1995) Reducing maternal mortality in Kigoma, Tanzania. Health Policy Plan 10(1):71–78. doi: 10.1093/heapol/10.1.71 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eugene Justine Kongnyuy
    • 1
  • Grace Mlava
    • 2
  • Nynke van den Broek
    • 1
  1. 1.Child and Reproductive Health GroupLiverpool School of Tropical MedicineLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.The Health Foundation ConsortiumLilongweMalawi

Personalised recommendations