Abstract
Objectives
To evaluate the long-term outcomes and hysterectomy rates after hysteroscopic endometrial resection with or without myomectomy for menorrhagia.
Study design
Fifty-three women who had submucous myomas with intramural extension of less than 50% and smaller than 5 cm in diameter underwent endometrial resection and concomitant hysteroscopic myomectomy. Each of them was matched with a patient who had no submucous myomas and who had been treated by endometrial resection only. These two groups were compared for operative outcomes, additional procedures, outcome of menstrual bleeding and for subsequent hysterectomy, which was the endpoint of this study.
Results
During the mean follow-up period of 6.5 years, 18 (34.6%) women with endometrial resection and myomectomy and 21 (39.6%) without myomectomy underwent at least one gynecological procedure. Hysterectomy was performed in 26.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 16.8–40.3] of the patients with myomectomy and in 17.0% (95% CI 9.2–29.2) of the patients without myomectomy (P = 0.22). The main indications for hysterectomy were pain and spotting bleeding in seven out of 14 cases with myomectomy and in four out of nine with endometrial resection only. Leiomyomas were found in 12 out of the 14 women who had hysterectomy after hysteroscopic myomectomy and in four out of nine with hysterectomy after endometrial resection only (P = 0.06). Most (75.6%) of the 82 women who had not required hysterectomy had reached menopause. All the patients without hysterectomy in both groups reported amenorrhea or slight bleeding, and this response maintained for years after the treatment.
Conclusion
Endometrial resection may be combined with hysteroscopic myomectomy without a significant increase or decrease in hysterectomy rates during a long-term follow-up.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott JA, Garry R (2002) The surgical management of menorrhagia. Hum Reprod Update 8(1):68–78. doi:10.1093/humupd/8.1.68
Lethaby A, Shepperd S, Cooke I Farquhar C (2004) Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding (Cochrane review). In: The Cochrane library, issue 2. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp 1–25
Nagele F, O’Connor H, Davies A, Badawy A, Mohammed H, Magos A (1996) 2500 outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopies. Obstet Gynecol 88(1):87–92. doi:10.1016/0029-7844(96)00108-1
Wortman M, Daggett A (1995) Hysteroscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 3(1):39–46. doi:10.1016/S1074-3804(05)80135-5
O’Connor H, Magos A (1996) Endometrial resection for the treatment of menorrhagia. N Engl J Med 335(3):151–156. doi:10.1056/NEJM199607183350302
Loffer FD (2005) Improving results of hysteroscopic submucosal myomectomy for menorrhagia by concomitant ablation. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12(3):254–260. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2005.04.001
Tapper A-M, Heinonen PK (1995) Hysteroscopic endomyometrial resection for the treatment of menorrhagia–follow-up of 86 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 62(1):75–79. doi:10.1016/0301-2115(95)02177-9
Tapper A-M, Heinonen PK (1997) Experience with isotonic 2.2% glycine as distension medium for hysteroscopic endomyometrial resection. Gynecol Obstet Invest 47(4):263–267. doi:10.1159/000010119
Loffer FD (1990) Removal of large symptomatic intrauterine growths by the hysteroscopic resectoscope. Obstet Gynecol 76:836–840
Engelsen IB, Woie K, Hordnes K (2006) Transcervical endometrial resection: Long-term results of 390 procedures. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85(1):82–87
Aberdeen Endometrial Ablation Trials Group (1999) A randomised trial of endometrial ablation versus hysterectomy for the treatment of dysfunctional bleeding: outcome at four years. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106(9):360–366
Cooper KG, Jack SA, Parkin DE, Grant AM (2001) Five-year follow up of women randomised to medical management or transcervical resection of the endometrium for heavy menstrual loss: clinical and quality of life outcomes. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 108(12):1222–1228. doi:10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00275-3
Boujida VH, Philipsen T, Pelle J, Joergensen JC (2002) Five-year follow-up of endometrial ablation: endometrial coagulation versus endometrial resection. Obstet Gynecol 99(6):988–992. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(02)01954-3
Heinonen PK, Helin R, Nieminen K (2006) Long-term impact and risk factors for hysterectomy after hysteroscopic surgery for menorrhagia. Gynecol Surg 3(4):265–269. doi:10.1007/s10397-006-0219-8
Pooley AS, Ewen SP, Sutton CJG (1998) Does transcervical resection of the endometrium for menorrhagia really avoid hysterectomy? Life table analysis of a large series. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 5(3):229–235. doi:10.1016/S1074-3804(98)80024-8
Comino R, Torrejon R (2004) Hysterectomy after endometrial ablation-resection. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11(4):495–499. doi:10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60082-5
Gandhi SV, Fear KBC, Sturdee DW (1999) Endometrial resection: factors affecting long-term success. Gynaecol Endosc 8(1):41–50. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2508.1999.00213.x
Wamsteker K, Emanuel MH, de Kruif JH (1993) Transcervical hysteroscopic resection of submucous fibroids for abdominal uterine bleeding: results regarding the degree of intramural extension. Obstet Gynecol 82(5):736–740
Van Dongen H, Emanuel MH, Smeets MJ, Trimbos B, Jansen FW (2006) Follow-up after incomplete hysteroscopic removal of uterine fibroids. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85(12):1463–1467
Dueholm M, Forman A, Ingerslev J (1998) Regression of residual tissue after incomplete resection of submucous myomas. Gynaecol Endosc 7(6):309–314. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2508.1998.00203.x
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by grants from competitive research funding of the Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Tampere, Finland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rovio, P.H., Helin, R. & Heinonen, P.K. Long-term outcome of hysteroscopic endometrial resection with or without myomectomy in patients with menorrhagia. Arch Gynecol Obstet 279, 159–163 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-008-0694-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-008-0694-4