Stillbirth following previous cesarean section in Bavaria/Germany 1987–2005
- 101 Downloads
An elevated risk for unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancies after cesarean section was reported in 2003. This finding would imply renewed discussions about stronger indications for cesarean sections.
To find out whether there is an elevated risk for stillbirth in subsequent pregnancies after cesarean section in our cohort in Bavaria.
As data linkage of records is not possible in Germany, we devised a suitable adjustment for bias correction. Second pregnancies in Bavaria/Germany after previous vaginal birth and previous cesarean section from 1987 to 2005 were analyzed. Risk of unexplained stillbirth was estimated by time-to-event analysis.
In our cohort of 629,815 second pregnancies, no elevated stillbirth risk in pregnancies after previous cesarean section compared to previous vaginal birth was noted (crude risk 0.22% in both groups; hazard ratio (HR) 1.00; P = 1.0). A slightly decreased risk for stillbirth after previous cesarean section for the period of 1994–2005 (HR 0.674; P = 0.04) could be shown.
We found no elevated stillbirth risk in pregnancies after previous cesarean section. The significantly lower risk for stillbirths after previous cesarean section in the period 1994–2005 is interpreted as consequence of improved obstetric surveillance. With our adjustment for bias correction, we hope to have found a way to make our data largely comparable with other sources reported in the literature. However, because of the strict German data protection act, the Bavarian birth register is only of limited use for the presented study.
KeywordsStillbirth Cesarean section Retrospective analysis Bavaria-Germany
- 1.Infant Mortality. Statistics from the 1999 period linked birth/death data set. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nsvr/nsvr50/nsvr50_04.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2002
- 3.Winn HN (1996) Postterm pregnancy: fetal considerations. In: Chervenak FA, Kurjak A (eds) Current perspectives on the fetus as a patient. Parthenon Publishing Group, New York, pp 571–580Google Scholar
- 9.Roberts AB, Patterson NS (1990) Pregnancy in women with diabetes mellitus, twenty years of experience: 1968–87. N Z Med J 102:211Google Scholar
- 18.Liebermann E (1997) Predictors of cesarean delivery. Curr Probl Obstet Gynecol Fertil 20:98–131Google Scholar
- 19.Norwitz ER (2004) Patient choice caesarean delivery. Official reprint from Up To Date. http://www.uptodate.com. Topic last changed 6 Aug 2004
- 22.Parsons LS (2004) Performing a 1:n case–control match on propensity score. Poster presented at the SUGI conference, Montreal, Canada, 9–12 May 2004Google Scholar
- 23.Parsons LS (2001) Reducing bias in a propensity score matched pair sample using greedy matching techniques. In: Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual SAS Users Group international conference, Long Beach, California, 22–25 April 2001. SAS institute Inc., CaryGoogle Scholar